Criminal Courts - Appeals by the Prosecution Flashcards
Definiton
- Prosecution cannot appeal against D’s conviction or sentence.
- They can appeal one of the following ways made available by Parliament.
Appeal against a Judge’s ruling
The Criminal Justice Act 2003:
-If a judge makes a ruling on a point of law which stops the case (e.g. a directed acquittal) the prosecution can appeal.
Appeal against acquittal
This can be done for 2 reasons:
1. ‘Jury Nobbling’: If D is acquitted due to a juror being bribed or threatened, the prosecution can appeal.
- Due to new compelling evidence: The Criminal Justice Act 2003 says if D has been acquitted of a crime but new and compelling evidence comes to light which points to D’s guilt, the Prosecution can appeals and ask C of A to quash D’s acquittal so that D can be retried.
E.g. R v Dobson and Norris: D was retried for Stephen Lawrence’s murder and convicted after the C of A quashed his original acquittal. He is now spending a minimum of 15 years in prison.
Appealing by referring a point of law
The Criminal Justice Act 1972:
- Judge may have made an error when explaining the law to the jury resulting D’s acquittal, the Attorney General can ask the C of A to make a ruling on the point of law to clarify what the law says. It will NOT affect D’s acquittal but will set precedent for the future.
Against an ‘unduly lenient’ sentence
The Criminal Justice Act 1988 says the Prosecution can ask the Attorney General to send a case to the C of A for D’s sentence to be increased if it is thought to be unduly lenient (too soft).
E.g. R v Yates where D’s 7 year sentence is increased by the C of A for supplying a gun for murder to 12 years as 7 years was considered ‘unduly lenient’