Criminal Constitution Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

O’Grady v. Sparling

A
  • Allowed provincial HTA and the federal CCC to drive/exist side by side
  • Both define offences
  • Ruled it did not violate federal criminal law and constitution paramountcy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Firearms Reference Case (2000)

A
  • Found the federal registry of long guns was not a constitutional invasion of provincial jurisdiction (on property and civil rights)
  • Could be justified under the federal criminal law power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Margarine Reference Case (1949)

A
  • Found the federal government could not encroach on provincial constitutional powers over property and civil rights
  • Not by requiring a criminal sanction of a fine/jail sentence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R. v. Ruzic

A
  • Statutory requirements under s.17 of CC (duress defence) was struck down as unconstitutional
  • Was an infringement of s.7 of the Charter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R. v. Malmo-Levinne

A

-The Narcotics Control Act would NOT be struck down because the government couldn’t prove risk of harm of marijuana

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R. v. Oakes

A
  • Posession of drugs automatically led to charge of possession with intent to traffic
  • Was up to the accused to prove there was no intent to traffic
  • Infringed s.11(d) of Charter (presumption of innocence)
  • that part of the Narcotics Control Act was removed (automatic charge added no longer in effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R. v. Keegstra

A
  • “Holocaust never happened” to students
  • Promoting race hatred (argued it infringed s.2(b) of Charter
  • Justified under s.1 of Charter (protect free/democratic society)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R. v. Mack

A
  • Drug entrapment/harassment

- Tried to argue entrapment violated s.11(d) of Charter (presumed innocent) - failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R. v. Sue Rodriguez

A
  • Physician assisted suicide

- Violation of s.15 of Charter (equality)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R. v. Bedford

A
  • Prostitution

- Many Charter violations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R. v. Morgentaller

A
  • Abortion

- Violates s.7 of Charter (life, liberty and security of the person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R. v. Big M Drug Mart

A
  • Religion (ability to work on Sundays)

- Violates s.2(a) of Charter (right to religion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly