Criminal Flashcards
Actus Reus
Physical Part - Overt Act
Elements of the crime describe the actions that the defendant performs or the result by the action.
Malum in Se
Wrong in itself / naturally evil
Malum Prohibitum
Something made wrong by legislation (like speeding)
Felony
In most jurisdictions, is a crime that is crime punishable by death or by a sentence of more then one (1) year even though the sentence actually imposed is one year or less. In some states, a crime is a felony if the sentence is to be served in a state prison as opposed to a county or city jail.
Misdemeanor
A lesser crime than a felony. In most jurisdictions, a crime is a misdemeanor if the highest penalty that can be imposed is one year or less.
Mens Res
Mental Part
Element of a crime which require a particular mental state at the time of the proscribed crime.
Criminal Law Checklist (High Level)
Mnemonic: Felons in Prison Habitually Purpose Planning Murderous Deeds
I. Formation II. Inchoate Crimes III. Crimes against the Person IV. Crimes against Habitation V. Crimes against Property VI. Property Interest VII. Miscellaneous Crimes VIII. Defenses, Justifications and Excuses
Formation (Checklist)
Actus Reus A. Mens Res/Transferred Intent/Concurrence/Merger B. Accomplice Liability Intent Knowledge Active Assistance Withdrawal C. Vicarious Liability Strict Liability Crimes Vicarious Liability
Inchoate Crimes (Checklist)
Inchoate Crimes (SAC) Solicitation Attempt Conspiracy Pinkertons Rule Whartons Rule
Crimes Against the Person (Checklist)
Crimes Against the Person
Homicide IRAC Homicide Causation Actual Cause Proximate Cause Murder/Malice Degree of Murder First Second Justifications Excuses Mitigation to Voluntary Manslaughter Involuntary Manslaughter
Non-Homicide Assault Battery False Imprisonment Kidnapping Mayhem Rape
Crimes against Habitation (Checklist)
Burglary
Arson
Merger Rule
Under the Merger Doctrine, when all the elements of one crime are included within the elements of another crime, the lesser crime merges with the greater and a defendant cannot be convicted of both crimes.
-Larceny merges with Robbery, battery merges with murder
Additionally, the Merger Rule applies to solicitation and attempt to prevent a person from being convicted of either of these and of the completed target crime.
Solicitation
Solicitation occurs when one counsels, incites, solicits, or requests another tom commit an unlawful act.
Merger Rule for Solicitation
1. Solicitation merges with an attempt, conspiracy, or target offense.
2. Solicitor cannot be punished for both the solicitation and the other crimes.
3. If the solicitee actually commits the target crime, then the solicitor can be help criminally liable for it.
4. If the solicitee takes no steps in furtherance of the target crime, then the solicitor is guilty of the solicitation but there is no merger.
Withdrawal from Solicitation
Rule Split:
Common Law:
Withdrawal has no effect as to the solicitation but will avoid accomplice liability.
MPC
Withdrawal is recognized as a defense if the defendant manifests “complete and voluntary “abandonment of criminal purpose.
Impossibility and Solicitation
Rule Split
Common Law:
Impossibility of committing the target crime is a valid defense.
MPC:
Impossibility of committing the target crime is not a valid defense.
Attempt
An attempted crime occurs when one attempts but fails to complete a crime.
The prosecution must prove there was criminal intent, accompanied by an act which came within proximity of committing the crime.
Act required for attempt.
Attempt requires an act which comes within close proximity of committing the crime that is a “substantial step” toward completion.
ASS: Attempt Substantial Step
Merger Rule for Attempt
Every completed crime inherently includes an attempt, but the attempt merges with the target crime if the target crime is completed. In this case, you do not need to discuss the attempt or merger.
If the crime was attempted but not completed, then attempt is charged.
Withdrawal from Attempt
Rule Split:
Majority: If the zone of perpetration has been entered then withdrawal is ineffective as a defense.
Minority: If the attempted crime is voluntarily and successfully abandoned the withdrawal will be an effective defense (MPC)
Impossibility and Attempt
Factual impossibility is no defense.
D attempts to commit a crime but facts which are unknown to B make is impossible for him to do so.
IE. Attempts to kill someone by shooting him but there are no bullets in the gun or tries to steal a wallet but there is no wallet.
Legal impossibility is a valid defense.
D intends and acts to commit a crime but his acts even if completed fo not constitute a crime.
Discerning between factual and legal impossibility
Generally, it is a factual impossibility if the defendant is unaware of facts that make it impossible to commit the crime. Generally, it’s a legal impossibility if the acts had they been completed would not have constituted a crime.
CASE: State v. Guffey 262 S.W.2d 152 (1953)
Guilty of attempting to hunt deer during off season when he shot the stuffed deer.
SLAP
S: Specific Intent to commit the target crime
L: Legal vs Factual Impossibility (Legal =no attempt, Factual = Attempt)
A: Apparent ability (Actus Reus)
P: Preparation vs. Perpetration
1. Look for the substantial step towards completion of the crime.
2. look for “dangerous proximity to success.”