criminal Flashcards
custody officer
rank of at least seargant.
- indictable offence
- (including either way offences)
- reasonable grounds to believe 1) lead to interference with or harm to evidence connected with the offence or interference or physical injury to other persons 2) lead to altering others suspected of having committed ab offence who have not yet been arrested for it.
- must not exceed 36 hours from the relevant time - intiail decision to detain. and in any event if the ground ceases to apply - not allowed.
SUSPECT MUST BE INFORMED OF THE REASONS AND NOTED IN THE CUSTODY RECORD.
delaying access to legal advice
superintendant or above (higher than inspector) Super Important!!!
ranking
Police Constable ·
Sergeant ·
Inspector ·
Chief Inspector ·
Superintendent ·
Chief Superintendent ·
Assistant Chief Constable.
delaying right to be notified
inspector of above (less important than superintendant) for the same reasons as delaying right to legal advice. can also be delayed up to 36 hours.
extending detention times
24-36 hours - superintendant or above (super important) like access to legal advice
- neccessary to secure or preserve evidence or question them
- diligently and expeditiously
- indictable offence
more than 36 hours - warrants from the magistrates court
- court must be made up of a minimum of 2 magistrates or a district judge
- the application is made on oath by a warranted constable supported by written information
- indictable offence
- the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds as before.
max 96 hours.de
detention reviews
officer of at least the rank of inspector determines whetehr a suspects continued detention is justified.
the clock begins when the custody officer has authorised the initial detention.
1st review: no more than 6 hours after initial detention.
- no more than 9 hours after the initial review.
- 9 hours after 2nd review - third review , charge or seek extension or release on bail under invesitgation, ir release without charge.
code D (iDentification procedures)
identification procedure MUST TAKE PLACE IF:
1. an eyewitness has identified or claims to have identified a suspect or there is a witness who claims they can identify the suspect of where there is a reasonable chance of the witness being able to do so and
2) the eyewitness has not already been given an opportunity to identify the suspect in an approved identification procedure and
3) there is an issue or identity where the suspect disputes being the person to have been seen committing the crime.
exceptions:
- it is not practiable to hold such a prodecude or
- any such procedure would serve no useful purpose in proving or disporving whetehr the suspect was involved with comitting the offence
e.g. where the suspect admits to being at the scne and eyewitness does not have anything to dispute this
or where it is not disputed that the suspect is already known to the eyewitness who claims to have recognised them when seeing them commit the crime.
may also be held if the officer in charge considers it would be useful after consulting the identification officer.
whether an identiy procedure will be held dpeends on whether the suspect is known and available
police have sufficient information to justify a persons arrest due to their suspected involvement.
available if they are immediately or wirthin a reasnably short period of time, willing to take part in an identiification procedure
identification officer
independent from the main investigation
rank of at least inspector.
types of identification procedures and their rules
- video
- must include the suspect and at least 8 other people (9 people) + so far as possinle resemble the suspect in age, general appearance and position in life - identification parade: normal room or one quipped with a screen
- group identification
- should be held where other people are passing informally by or waiting around informally - confrontation
- must take place in the presence of the suspects splicitor or friend unless this would cause unreasonable delay.
solicitor acting wrong in interview
e.g. answering questions on clients behalf
if a officer of superintendant or above - takes the view that a soliitor is misconducting themselves they may require them to leave on the grounds that they are impeding the interrview. must be provided the opportunity to consult with another solicitor. §
custody time limits
refers to the max amount of time that an individual may be remanded in custody during a criminal trial.
56 days for summary only offences
70 days for cases tsend to the crown cprt
70 days for either way offences being tried in the magistrates court fron first appearance to trial.
this is reduced to 56 days if allocation is held within the first 56 days.
182 days for indictable only offences sent to the crown court sending to arraignment in the crown court.
failing to surrender
criminal offence
magistrates - up to 3 months + 5,000 max fine
crown corut - 12months + unlimited fine.
breaching bail conditions
not a criminal offence
police officer has power to arrest without warrant: if
- reasonable grounds to beliee tha they have broken bail conditions or are likley to break.
must be brought to magistrates court within 24 hours. if not they MUST be released.
theft and criminal damage and burglary either way/summary
summary only theft: < 200. can elect for trial in crown court regardless
criminal damage < 5000 magistrates and CANNOT elect for trial by jury in the crown court.
exceptions: treated as an either way offence regardless of how inexpensive the property damaged is
- where the property is damaged or destroyed by arson
where the property damaged or destroyed is a memorial only applies after june 2022.
BURGLARY:
-Treated as an either way offence unless exceptions apply and it is treated as indictable only
- ulterior offence intneded to be committed whilst in the building or part of the building is indictable only
- where the burglary was in a dwelling and any person in the dwelling was subjected to violence/threat of violence
- the defendant is charged with a burlgary pof a dwelling, has two previous and separate convictions for domestic burglary, aged 18 and over - three strikes rule k
initial details of the prosecution case
only applies to summary or either way offences not indictable only.
must be sufficient to assist the court in order to identify the real issues and to give appropriate directions for an effective trial.
- should enable the court and defendant t take an informed view of plea venue for trial case management and sentencing at the first hearing.
IDPC contents
depends on whether the defendant was in police custody for the offence charged immediately before the first hearing in the magistrates court or not.
defendant was in police custody (a summary of the circumstances of the offence and the defendants criminal record if any.
not in police custody immediately before the first hearing (a summary of the circumstances of the offence, any account given by D in the interview whether cintained in that summary or in another document., any written witness statement or exhibit that the prosecutor then has available and considers mayerial to the plea or to the allocation of the case for trial or to sentencem the defendatns criminal record if any and any available statement of the effect of the offence on a victi a victims family or others.
the list is expanded where the defendant has been released on bail after being charged and where the prosecutor does not anticiapte a guilty plea at the first hearing ib the magistrates court. unless there is good reason not to do so the prosecution should also make available:
-
means test
adjusted income less than 12475 in the magistrates court - funding available.
in the crown court means test passed, funding available and no contirbution required.
MORE THAN 12475 LESS THAN 22,325
- magistrates court - depends on full means test
crown court - depends on full means test contribution may also be required
more than £22325
magistrates - failed
crown court depends on full means test contribution may also be required.
more than 37,500 of disposable incoe - means test failed no funding available.
full means test
disposable income:
- 3,398 or LESS - passed.
more than 3,398-no more than 37,500 - magistrates no funding available
crown court passed but contirbution will be required.
defence statements
magistrates court - defendant MAY if so within 14 days after prosecution comply with initial disclosure
crown court - MUST within 28 days after the prosecution comply with their initial duty of disclosure.
faults with defence disclosure
the defendant may be subject to adverse inferences or comment at trial
- the court or any other party may make such comments as appear appropriate
- the court or jury may draw inferences as appear proper in deciding whether the accused is guilty of the offence.
permission is not generally required for the prosecution to make a comment on faults with the defence statement - the main exception is where the information that was not disclosed refers to a point of law
however cant be made solely on this - the judge must direct the jury expressly on this matter.
disclosure obligations
- prosecution initial duty
- MC: as soon as is reasonably practiable after the defendant pleads not guilty
- CC as soon as is reasonably practiable after the case is sent for trial
prosecution continuing duty
- if following initial disclosure, furhter information or evidence comes to light which satisfies the disclosure test, then the prosecution must disclose it to the defendant as soon as it is reasonably practiable.
- defence statement magistrates court (not obligatory)
- not more than 14 days after the prosecution discloses matieral or serves notice that there is no such material to disclose
- cc: not more than 28 days after the prosecution discloses material in line with their initial duty of disclosure or serves notice that there is no such material to disclose.
turnball guidance
established guidelines for judges in trials where identification evidence is disputed.
applies equally to cases in magistrates court.
when identification is a matter in issue the task falls to the judfe to determine the quality of evidence.
factors judge will consider:
- the length of time a witness observed defendant
- was the observation impeded
- the conditions of the idnetification e.g. distant, lighting, weater.
- was the defendant previously known to witness
- the length of time which has elapsed between original sighting and procedure
- discrepancy between described attributes
once the judge has considered the quality will then decide:
- identification of good quality or of poor quality but supported by other prosecution evidence - where a case depends wholly or subsantially on whether the identification is correct a turnball direction should be given to the jury to warn the jury of the need for caution before convicting after relying on the evidence.
- identification is of poor qiality and unsupported
- the judge should invite submissions from the advocates and if appropriate withdraw the case from the jury at the conclusion of the prosecutions case - the judge will direct the jury to acquit the defendant in this case.
adverse inferences
s34 - silence when questioned or charged
- the constables questioning was for the purpose of discovering how and who committed the alleged offences
- the defendant relied on a fact as part of their defence athat wasnt mentioned
- it was reasonable in the circumstances for the defendant to have mentioned the fact to a constable when questined before or on charge.
s35 failure to testify at trial
- without good cause - silence can only be attributed to the defendant having no answer or no answer that would stand up to cross examination
consider:
- the defendant was given the opportunity to testify
- the defendant understood the courts ability to draw inferences from the faolure to testify or their refusal without good reason to answer a question put to them.
s36/37 failure to account for objects or presence at a particular place - doesnt matter if they dont later rely on it
- can only be drawn if when the defendant is arrested a constable reasonably believes that the object substance, mark or presence at a particular place relates to the defendants participation in an offence and a special warning is given
special warning:
- ordinary language
- what offence is being investigated
- what fact they are being asked to account for
- that this fact may be due to them taking part in the commission of the offence
- that the court may draw inferences as appear proper if they fail or refuse to account for the fact
- that a record is being made of the interview and it may be given in evidence at trial
s38 cjpoa
conviction cannot be brought if an inference is drawn soley from the fact.
character evidence
bad character= misconduct vidence = doesnt include evidence which has to do with the alleged facys pf the offence with which the defendant is charged
seven gateways s101(1)
bad character evidence will only ve admissible on application by the prosecution or a co defendant if it satisfies one of the 7 gateways
a) all parties agree
b) the evidence is adduced by the defendant themselves or is given to in an answer to a question
c) the evidence is important explantory evidence
d) the evidence is relevant to an important issue between defendant and prosecution
e) the evidence has substantial probative value in relation to an important matter in issue
f) the evdence is required to correct a false impression given by the defendant
g) the defendant has made an attack on another persons character
procedure for admitting defendant bad character evidence
part 21 of the criminal procedure rues
notice: draft + serve ntice - the facts of the misconduct relied on, an explanation as to how those facts will be proved and a statement as to why it is admissible
time limits
prosecution drafts and serves notice: not more than 20 business days after a not guilty plea in the magistrates court or 10 business days after a not guilty plea in the crown court.
challenging notice
not more than 10 business days after the initial notice was served - served on the court officer
0 which facts the defendant objects to
which if any facts of the misconduct the party instead admits why ti would be unfair additional ojections
gateways for a non defendant
it is of important explanatory evidence or
it is of substantial probative value
or all parties agree
suspended sentences
when a court imposes a custodial sentence which is determinate of more than 14 days but less than 2 years (or = to) i may be suspended.
must last for at least 6 months but not more than 2 years.co