Crime & Deviance Flashcards
measuring crime - strengths of OCS
- cheap (practical)
- readily available (practical)
- up to date & contemporary (valid)
- collected in standardized, systematic & scientific way (reliable)
- can be easily checked & verified (highly reliable)
- cover a large population (representative)
- collected by state and seen to be highly valid (valid)
- few ethical issues
measuring crime - weakness of ocs
- many crimes not recognised as such and therefore not reported to police (lack validity)
- based on operational definitions that sociologists wouldn’t agree on (changed definitions of drug offences)
- ‘coughing & cuffing’ - police encourage people to admit to crimes they haven’t done. they may not record some crimes if they think its unsolvable (low validity)
- definitions, laws and police rules change so you cant really compare overtime. (low reliability)
- many crimes aren’t reported even if they are aware it took place, due to proximity of station or too frightened to report.
- statistics don’t really reveal why people have committed crimes.
- don’t provide complete picture of all the crimes.
official crime statistics
police, court prison records, crime survey (CSEW)
- collected by home office
- functionalists would agree with ocs bc we live in a value consensus and the police is one of us, the quantitative data is reliable and representative
- new right & right realists support
- left realists recognise these figures aren’t perfect
james patrick whistleblower - worked as a police officer and analysed crime statistic for 12 months and found many serious sexual offences were ‘no crimed’ and burglary was seen as a lower type offence
victim surveys
police, court, prison records and csew data. victim reports the crime eg islington crime survey
- collected by home office
self report studies
people are asked about the crimes they’ve committed themselves. quantitative & longitudinal.
eg cambridge study & edinburgh study
victim survey strengths
- good picture of extent and patterns of victimisation (Valid)
- overcomes significant proportion of events that arent reported by police (valid)
- 10-15 yr olds can be included(representative)
- carried out annually, (reliable)
- largest social survey (representative)
- high response rates of 75 and 68% in 2013-14
victim survey weaknesses
- even though they are anonymous, victims under report sexual offences. (invalid)
- interviewer effects (invalid)
- young - there is still dark figure of crime present, there will be occasional inaccuracies (invalid)
- crimes such as fraud not includes also victimless crimes like drunkenness (invalid)
- some crimes depend on the victims definition of crime (invalid)
- inaccuracy of crime categories
- problem with basing statistics on victims memories.
self report surveys strengths
- ethical and valid because they stress confidentiality and anonymity for the respondent
- findings from self reports challenge the picture of a typical criminal. eg campbell found the statistics of crime by men and women are closer than police figures suggest
self report surveys weakness
- interviewer effects
- high dropout rate, high attrition rate more likely to miss out on frequent offenders (farrington et al)
- response rates from those with a criminal record was lower than those without
- distributed amongst young people, harder to record white collar crime (unrepresentativeness)
- impossible to include all criminal acts in a questionnaire, researcher must be selective (invalid, unrepresentative)
- inaccuracy of crime categories
- some exaggerate offences to give tough impression
- people may under report as it requires offenders memories
existence of dark figure of crime
1) white collar crime (big corporations, politicians)
2) coughing and cuffing through police
3) institutions avoid bad publicity (royal family prince andrew sexual offender claims)
4) victims may fear humiliation or feel powerless.
relativity of crime and deviance
1) time - when the act takes place (alcohol consumption in the US in 1920s, legal now over 21)
2) location - where the act happens (naked in public vs in bathtub)
3) social situation - the context (killing on the street, killing in army)
4) culture - different cultures have different expectations (women exposing legs in islamic countries v in western societies)
crime
a legal wrong followed by criminal proceedings which may result in punishment.
deviance
behaviour that does not conform to dominant norms of a specific society. not always law breaking
ways to create conformity
1- social order, general conformity to shared norms and values.
2- social control, the process which people are persuaded to conform and obey rules (informal and formal)
3- formal social control, carried out by gov,police etc
4- informal social control, carried out by education system and families
social class : offending and victimisation
offending: increase in lower socioeconomic classes in prison 67% compared 5%.
- 32% population of prisoners have been homeless compared to 0.9% general population.
:( - these statistics may be unequivalent because some are underreported
:( class bias in criminal justice system
victimisation: young, unemployed, lone parents more likely to be robbed. they’re more vulnerable and criminals have easier access and can steal easily from lower socioeconomic class.
‘myth of an equal victim’
gender : offending and victimisation
offending:
-police recorded crime figures show that males commit 80% of crimes
-females only accounted for 18% arrests in 2013
ocs suggest peak age of offending for girls is 15 whereas males is 18. however as girls grow older crime rates drop significantly.
victimisation:
-csew shows fewer women are victims of crime compared to men
- men are more likely to be victims of violence but women are more likely to report abuse and sexual abuse
-Stanko- during 1 hr period violence was reported every second but few led to an arrest
-hammen + saunders found 20% of women had been sexually assaulted & reported it.
age : offending and victimisation
offending : young people more likely to offend than adults
23% in 2009-10 was 10-17 yr olds.
Juvenile offenders more likely to receive a caution compared to adult offenders
Victimisation: older people have a fear of crime whereas younger people are more likely to be victims of crime. Somewhat supported by islington survey.
ethnicity : offending and victimisation
more people from asian & black backgrounds get stopped and searched and arrested compared to their white counterparts.
- black people 3x more likely to get arrested than white people
- black people compromised 3.1% of population but 14.2% were accounted for stop and searches
victimisation:
-adults from mixed, black and asian groups were more likely to be victims of crime compared to whites. home office suggests black people are 5x more likely to be murdered than their white counterparts.
Functionalism Durkheim AO1
- crime is integral part of healthy society. eg suffragette movement, we cannot easily move towards independence without crime
- crime is inevitable, there will be a lack of value consensus and this will cause chaos.
- members of society must have boundary maintenance by learning what is acceptable and what isn’t. They are condemned if people go against these boundaries
- state of anomie: if society allows too much crime and deviance it results to a breakdown of social order. eg major economic upheaval
- safety valve: allowing individual to let off steam to prevent worse deviance eg prostitution leads to lack of sexual assault from men
- social solidarity: crime brings people together as they have a collective anger towards the crimes. community will police itself
functionalism merton ao1
strain theory - clear goals in any structured society. strain occurs when the goal is emphasised more than the means
eg ‘american dream = success, cars etc’ however lack of means to to achieve this goal.
5 adaptations or reactions to strain:
- conformity, next step to achieving the goal
- ritualism, same activity everyday like a routine
- innovation, alternatives to achieve the goal
- retreatism, someone that may start gambling etc
-rebellion, becoming a dropout
ao3 durkheim
- marxists would criticize durkheim because they would argue there isnt value consensus. the laws are made by the state in interest of the ruling class. there is hegemony, not consensus
- realists would criticise the idea of crime being functional, as crime creates issues for victims and society and we should focus on how to stop it
- some functionalists would criticize why some society has more crime than others. he doesnt consider why some people may commit crime while others dont. most people in society dont commit crime.
ao3 merton
taylor - whole game could have been rigged to guarantee the powerfuls success by enforcing laws
walton & young - cannot account for politically motivated criminals, who break the law bc of commitment to their cause rather than anomie effects.
subcultural theory ao1 : cohen
- wc boys are denied status in society and have middle class values and aspirations but lack the means to achieve success.
- this leads to status frustration as they feel failure.
- they react to this by rejecting social values and mainstream culture.
- as a result value is placed on stealing, truancy, vandalism etc
subcultural theory ao3 : cohen
too much focus on working class boys
pearce and pitts - 12,500 girls have lose involvement with gangs
harding - girls join gangs to become fixers