Crime And Deviance Flashcards
Durkheim, func, c and d
Value consensus/collective consciousness (socs shared sets of core values.) funds argue that in/formal soccon set what counts as dviant, d believed that as soc became more complex and modern, soc agencies became less effective at ensuring value consensus—> more c and d in post industrial socs
Interacts, c and d
Critical of funcs and value consensus as soc is too cpmplex, implies deviance is universal and fixed. Inters argue that normality is relative, and soccon. C and d, v and n are in a constant state of change. Inters acknowledge that some powerful groups can. Impose their definitions on others and label them as c and d
Depends on pov, time, place culture. Eg alcohol
Weberian c and d
Agreed w Marxists- wealthy dominate definitions of normality. But critical to the fact Marxists are reduce the power and inequality to just class. Believe there were other sources of inequality other than class- race, gender, ethnicity, religion, age, authority, coercion
Feminist c and d
Argue that in a patriarchal society. Men define what is normal and deviant. Eg for cases of rape, females are victim blamed.
Eval of Soccon of c and d
Some inters argue that there’s no such thing as normal or deviant behaviour. Some activities will never be morally positive. C and d are an invention of those w power, arguing that it is not real isn’t comforting to victims of crime.
Inters believe crime rates can be lowered through decriminalisation but this idea can be more easily be applied to trivial crimes rather than serious crimes.
Official Crime Statistics (OCS)
Dark figure of crime in ocs
Strengths of ocs
Limitations of ocs
Victims surveys eg csew
Limitations of csew
Other victims surveys, Islington crime surveys, Young et al
What did young say abt the Islington crime survey
Dobash and dobash crime survey
Limitations to crime surveys
Young’s eval of victim surveys
Self report studies
Campbell self report study findings
Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime, Srs
Srs limitations
Farmington evidence of Srs limitations
Attribution of Srs (limitation)
Ethics of Srs (limitation)
Functionalist view on ocs
Nr and right realist view on ocs
Left realists view on ocs
Feminist view on ocs
Marxist view on ocs
Inter view on ocs
Radical criminologist view on ocs
Social class and offending, Sutherland
Points out that criminality has higher incidence in the lower socioeconomic class. However the only evidence of this is found through young people and points towards the chaotic bgs assoc w poverty and deprivation.
Social classs and offernding, Social Exclusion unit
Reported that prisoners have a history of Soc excl, more likely to have grown up in care, poverty, and to have a family member convicted than the general pop. 5% rate of unlemplotement for gener pop, 67% of prison pop had been unemployed prior to imprisonment, 32% had been homeless compared to 0.9% of the gener pop
Social class and offending, Williams et al
Found that factors that were more freq in prisons. Were : having run away from home, exp violence, drug and alc misuse w/in the family. Regularly truanting from school. Literacy and numeracy lvls were signif lower than the gen pop. Most theories try to explain wc crime through lack of money and status, ocs show who gets caught. The gap between mc and wc crime isnt as big as ocs suggest.
Cavadino and Dignan, social class and offending
The difference between classes is ‘vastly magnified’ due to the different types of offences and class bias w/in the stages of the criminal justice system.
Gender
Ocs show men commit 80% of all offences
Peak age for female offending is 15, m is 18 and doesn’t decline significantly until their 20s.
Deprivation may impact females more than men- female offenders are more likely to be on benefits (2010/11)
Age and offending, McVie
Ocs suggest young people are more likely to offend than adults. Suggest there is not a clear relationship between offending an age. Age band grouping can disguise precise trends which make it hard to compare. Also different offences may leak in different ages. However statistics don’t break this down.
Age and offending, Soothill et al
Found the peak age of conviction for some crimes such as burglary is around 16 or less but drug offences peak between 21-25z age patterns in offending can be questioned- youth crime may be more viable than adult crime which may go undetected
Ethnicity and crime
Black men are 8x more likely to be stopped and searched than their white counterparts. Interactionists say that this is due to the prejudice of police officers
Social class and victimisation, Young
British crime surveyed 2010/11 young households, lone parents, the unemployed are twice as likely to be burgled than the average household.
Young- ‘myth of the equal victim’ certain groups like the poor are hit harder by crime when they become victims. The poor suffer more than the wealthy from the effects of crime. Eg uninsured are more affected by insured. Poor people are subject to ‘multiple victimisation’ the social problems they face increase their vulnerability to crime.
Gender and victimisation, young
Men are victims or crime more than women.
Women are two times more likely to report being victims of non sexual partner abuse, and 7x more likely to be victims of sexual assault.
Young- ‘meaning of the punch’ being in different situations, power dynamics are masked by statistics. Feminist argue that research for domestic violence dramatically mask the problem
Hammer and Saunder found unstructured interviews with women women in Leeds found 20% of women had been sa’d and not reported it.
Walk late and gender victimisation
Considered repeat victimisation and why women remain in abusive relationships and why women are unable to leave or report the abuse. They may have nowhere to go (made worse by children) some women lack economic independence. They may also have psychological issues- self blame, dependency, and lack of confidence
Age and victimisation, young
Older people are more likely to fear crime, young people are more likely to be victims of crime.
Young argued the fears are not as irrational as they seem.
Islington crime survey found over 45s had a lower crime rate than younger people but were more likely to be injured or lose time off work from attacks.
Ethnicity and victimisation
2005 home office evidence suggest black people are 5x more likely to be murdered than white people in England and wales.
Global organised crime definition and examples
Structured group of 3 or more people existing with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes and offences.
Drug/human trafficking, counterfeiting, extortion, kidnapping, money laundering.
Proving GOC
difficult to detect because it is hard to define. Only a fraction of criminal activity was discovered in 2009.
Organised crime is an 870 billion business annually.
The response to goc is slow and hampered by the diversity of the groups, lack of international cooperation, border issues
Gastow and goc
Lllular perception of oc such as the Maria and drug cartels are out of date and ‘fuel conflict, destroy the environment, corrupt governments, and drain resources’
G suggest the problem is that state boarders are irrelevant to goc (which makes them hard to track and police)
G predicts that inc wealth gapes will contribute to the demand for cheap contraband goods
Castell and goc
Sees goc groups as resembling business networks. Opportunity to link with criminal groups across countries- eg they may base management and production in low risk areas w little regulation but aim their marketing in more affluent places.
Robertson and goc
‘Glocalisation’- intertwining of the global and local. Local conditions impact global phenomenon eg the way drug trade is organised is based on political context, local demographics, culture, and law enforcement
What is green crime?
Crime that affects the environment
Eg dumping toxic waste, fly tipping, poaching endangered species.
There can be an overlap between goc and green crime.
Aas and the link between goc and green crime (glocalisation)
Green crime can intersect local and global impacts. Eg environmental harm is often due to a ch of geographically dispersed events and activities
Green crime is debatable and Marxist opinions
Not all activities that had the environment are illegal. Eg deforestation, co2 emission, mass fishing.
They all involve abuse of power in pursuit of profit.
Marxists would argue that the damage done exceeds ‘street crime’ and is an abuse of power from profit
Potter and Green crime
Shows that green crime caused public unrest eg fuel protests.
P argues that crime should be considered in terms of harm rather than the definition that those in power put down
Absence of clean drinking water- the poorest people suffer.
The rich corporations responsible avoid criminal repercussions
Carrabini, two types of green crime
Primary green crime- directly harm the sentiment and people. C recognised four main categories: air+water pollutions, defirestation, and species decline/animal rights
Secondary crime- actions committed as a response to green crime, eg attempts to cover it up by breaking environmental regulation or dealing w protesters aggressively OR using criminal organisation to assist w dumping toxic waste. As well as using state violence against environment groups.
Taylor, Marxist, effects of globalisation
Argues the inc in capitalism and globalisation has led to greater inequality and rising crime. T claimed globalisation created crime at both ends of the social spectrum.
Lower social group- Lack of legitimate employment opportunities caused by outsourcing to cheaper labor places means illegal options become more appealing.
Higher social group- Globalization of money markets has led to an increase of insider trading, tax evasion and wide scale fraud.
Beck, post mod, risk consciousness
(Risk consciousness- means out of control)
argues that society today is a Global Risk Society. (risks in the modern era are ‘man-made’ or ‘manufactured risks’) therefore the consequences were unpredictable. Eg global warming, flooding
This links in with the idea that individuals have adopted ‘risk consciousness’
Green crime is therefore on the socio-political agenda.
Potter Marxists
Green crime is an act of power as the ruling class define the law to benefit their own exploitative interests. Wcc is easy to get away with, especially in developing nations.
Eg green crime is more serious than street crime as it leads to more serious problems. Mostly the poor suffer from green crime- losing job or living in unhealthy conditions whereas the rich corporations avoid any damage.
Eco feminism
Believe humans are interdependent with the environment. Environmental harm hurts humans too. The environment and humans are liable to exploitation, especially global capitalism.
Eco feminists believe that the earth is oppressed and exploited in the way women are by the patriarchy. Men are to blame for environmental harm. Women do not harm the earth due to their ‘natural’ and maternal instincts.
Four positive aspects of crime, Durkheim func
1) Reaffirming the boundaries
2) changing value
3) social cohesion
4) safety valve
negative aspect of crime
Anomie (normlessness) small amounts of c and d can prevent it as long as it is punished, if two much crime is allowed or value consensus breaks down, then it leads to anomie. This threatens the stability of society which may cause a sudden change in gov, coup/revolution, disaster leading to destruction, major economic upheaval such as the London riot of 2011.
Members of society are concerned with their own selfish interests instead of social values.
A collapse of collective conscious leads to crime
Reimpose collective value to regain control after an anomie caused by too much crime.
Positive aspects of crime, 1) reaffirming boundaries
When a crime becomes public in the media, or punishments, or court ceremony. May also involve agencies of social control- police, criminal justice system