Crime Flashcards
Gender-Sex Role Theory
Parsons
diff in crime due to gender roles, men not at home so boys have no male role model. reject feminine behaviour, engage in compensatory compulsory masculinity, leads to aggression
Gender- Chivalry Thesis
Pollack
justice system more lenient w women bc men need to protect women, gender diff in crime exaggerated as women less likely to end up in system
Gender-Patriarchal Control
Heidensohn
society has control over women so they have less chance to commit crime
home, public and work
Gender-Liberation Thesis
Adler
women get liberated=crimes become as frequent and violent as men’s. given more opportunities to commit crime, rise in female crime
Gender-Class and Gender deals
Carlen- adopted Hirschi control theory
humans offered deal to conform to social norms
class- working women offer ended material reward w decent living
gender- patriarchal ideology promises marital and emotional reward from family
if don’t get the reward, turn to crime as have nothing to lose (WC women)
Theories (functionalism)- Adaptation to Strain
conformity- +goal +means
innovation- +goal -means
ritualism- -goal +means
retreatism- -goal -means
rebellion- -+goal -+ means
Theories (functionalism)- Strain Theory
Merton
American Dream (Messner and Rosenfeld)- opps for everyone, not everyone can get money goal through legit means, the strain to success, people have to turn to illegit means
frustration with strain leads to crime
people react differently to strain and adapt
Theories (marxism)- Law making
Chambliss
laws created to protect UC
east african colonisation- tax law to benefit uks economy
ruling class have power over what laws created and kept to benefit capitalism
Selective enforcement
powerless groups criminalised, crimes of powerful get ignored
Theories (interactionism)- Effects of labelling
Master status- label can dominate how society sees them, can’t get job so goes to deviant career
Young- hippies, counterculture, smoked weed and labels then as criminals, internalise it and do hard drugs- becomes master status
Primary/Secondary Deviance
Primary- minor
Secondary- major
Theories (marxism)- Criminogenic Capitalism
capitalism causes crime by very nature
Poverty- crime only way wc can live
Consumption- advertising leads to wanting goods so turn to crime to get them (utilitarian crime)
Frustration- alienation leads to frustration and aggression (non-utilitarian crime)
Theories (functionalism)- Positive functions of crime
Durkheim
Boundary maintenance- distinguishes between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour, deterrence
Safety valve- prostitution, doesn’t break up nuclear family, lesser of two evils
Theories- (interactionism)- Labelling Theory
Becker
no act is inherently criminal, it is only criminal when people label it as so
it is society’s reaction to the act that makes it deviant.
a deviant is someone who has successfully been labelled as so
Social Construction of Crime
act is only a crime bc society says that it is
there is no such thing as an inherently deviant act
Theories (marxism)- Ideological functions of crime
Pearce
crimes of powerful get ignored- RC blame other WC/immigrants for taking jobs to stop revolution, distract from crimes of powerful
creating false consciousness- capitalism seems beneficial through laws (health and safety) actually benefits capitalism by keeping worker fit for work
state selectively enforces laws so crime seem to be a WC thing
Theories (functionalism)- Status Frustration
Cohen
looks at deviance in WC boys, face anomie in MC school system and have cultural deprivation so at bottom of official status hierarchy- suffer status frustration, reject mainstream values and join deviant subculture
Theories (functionalism)- Alternative Status Hierarchy
Cohen
success gained from achieving alternative values through peers
can now achieve their goals (not society’s)
‘leader’ is who achieved opposite values the most
Theories (right realism)- Biological Differences
Wilson
differences make some people more predisposed to commit crime- personality like aggression and low impulses control or physical like lower intelligence
Theories (right realism)- Underclass
Murray
effective socialisation decreases likelihood of committing crime
depending on welfare state leads to people committing more crime
Theories (right realism)- Rational Choice Theory
Clarke
the decision to commit crime is a choice based on a rational calculation of the consequences- if rewards outweighs the costs than people will offend
Right realists say that the costa are low and so this is why crime is rising
Theories (right realism)- Broken Windows theory
Wilson and Kelling
essential to maintain orderly characteristics of neighbourhood to prevent crime taking hold- any vandalism must be dealt with immediately or people will see it and add to it
Theories (right realism)- Zero Tolerance
should increase the costs of crime to offenders to maximise deterrent
control the streets so people feel safe- no excuse for it and people should be punished immediately
Criticisms of Right Realism
causes:
-ignores wider structural causes like poverty
- overstates rationality and how far they make cost- benefit calculations, doesn’t explain impulsive crime
solutions:
-ignores crimes of the powerful
-gives police free rein to discriminate against minorities
Theories (left realism)- Relative Deprivation
how deprived someone feels in comparison to other people, leads to crime when people resent others and get frustrated and goes to crime to obtain what they want
media exacerbates this by showing off material goods
New Media and crime
Cyber crime arisen due to growth of internet, leads to moral panics as older people dont get new tech and cannot control is well enough. can cause crime or new media can prevent crime as more surveillance
Wall- 5 types of cyber crime
-global cyber crime
-cyber violence (causing harm)
-cyber pornography
-cyber deception and theft (identity theft)
-cyber trespass (hacking and spreading viruses)
Media distortion of crime
overrepresents violent and sexual crime- Duffy, 46% of media reports about them but only make up 3% of all crimes
exaggerates police success
exaggerate risk of victimisation
8 News values
criteria that editors decide if a story is news worthy
-immediacy: breaking news
-dramatisation: action and excitement
-personalisation: human interest stories abt people
-higher status: celebs
-novelty or unexpectedness: new angle
-risk: victim centred stories abt fear
-violence: visible acts
Media as a cause of crime
imitation
arousal
desensitisation
transmits knowledge
stimulating desire for unaffordable goods
Fear of crime
media causes unrealistic fear of crime by exaggerating amount of violent crime
Tumber- more media consumption means people had greater risk of becoming a victim. correlations doesnt prove that viewing media causes crime
criticism- ignores meanings viewers give to media violence (interpretivist)
Left realism- relative deprivation as a cause of crime
mass media increases sense of relative deprivation, pressure to conform can cause deviant behaviour when legit means are blocked (Merton)
Postmodernity- commodification of crime
media turn crime into commodity that people desire, encourage to consume crime through images
Hayward and Young- crime and its thrills become commodified. corporations use crime to sell products especially to youths, street hustler criminality w images of success
crime marketed to young people to seem cool and exciting (music videos)
Moral panics
media causes crime through labelling. creates moral panic through labelling group as folk devils and presents them in a way that exaggerates the problem, often leads to self fulfilling prophecy
Criticisms- assumes the societal reaction is a disproportionate overreaction
Thornton- little consensus abt what is deviant, what used to be 40 years ago is not today, moral panics are also more routine now and have less imapct
Left realism- relative deprivation
how deprived someone feels in relation to another, leads to crime when people resent others for having more than them and obtain things through crime.
Young- bad combo is RD and individualism, encourages pursuit of self interest at expense of others
Functionalism and crime criticisms
-based on stats which exaggerates picture as many crimes go unreported, dark figure
-assumes society has shared norms and values
-doesnt take into consideration the effect of agents of social control
Evaluation of Merton
shows how behaviour is result of mainstream goals, most crime property crime bc american society values material wealth so highly, lower class crime rates higher bc of lack of opportunity
overemphasises the role of social class- rich people commit white collar crime yet they dont have strain bc they have rescources
not all crime have a goal to comply with societys expectations like rape
Evaluation of Cloward and Ohlin
provide explanation for diff types of wc deviance in terms of different subcultures
ignore wider power structure and crimes of the wealthy, draw boundaries too sharply between diff types of deviance- some retreatist users are professional dealers and make a good living
assume everyone starts off sharing the same mainstream goals
Cicourel- labelling
officers have typifications on what a typical deliquent looks like and will concentrate on these types of people, law enforcement shows class bias as in WC areas people fitted the typifications more, policed patrolled these areas more and so found more crime which reinforced their original bias
other agents reinforce this like justice system- if didnt fit typifications then less likely to get sentences
means that justice can be negotiated
Deviance amplification spiral
process in which attempt to control deviance leads to an increase in level of deviance, so more control so more deviance
Young- hippies smoked weed and labelled as criminals so internalised and did hard drugs
Cohen- folk devil and moral panic, press exaggeration of mods and rockers and distortion began moral panic and had more entrepreneurs calling for crackdown, police arrested more people and so confirmed original media reaction so more public concern- DAS
Reintergrative shaming- Braithwaite
labels act but not actor, did a bad thing but not a bad person, avoids stigmatising them as evil while making aware of negative impact on other people, avoids pushing them into secondary deviance
crime later lower in places where this happens
Criticisms of labelling theory
deterministic- deviant career inevitable
emphasis on negative effects of labelling gives the offender a victim status and ignores real victims of crime
focuses on less serious crimes
fails to explain while people commit crime in the first place before labelled
uc people that label people as deviant so seen more that wc people commit more crime as they do not want to label their own