Crim Terms Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

General Detterence

A

Criminal punishments deter other people from committing that act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

specific deterrence

A

criminal punishment deters the actor from committing that act again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Incapacitation

A

Incarceration keeps people from committing crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

rehabilitation

A

people can be “cured” of their criminal tendencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

retribution

A

just deserts and vengeance justify criminal punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

expression of community values

A

criminal punishment educates people about what is wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

actus reus

A

the physical component of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

voluntary act

A

is an act that is only voluntary if it is a product of a person’s free will, manifested by a corresponding, external body movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

involuntary act

A

is an act that is only involuntary if it is NOT a product of a person’s free will, manifested by a corresponding, external body movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Omissions

A

when accused person had failed to act, he or she has not committed a criminal act and ordinarily cannot be convicted of a crime based upon that failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the ways a person does have legal duty to act - and hence can be convicted for a failure to act?

A

Where a statute imposes such a duty
Where a close “status relationship” exists
Where a contractual obligation exists
where a person takes the initiative and performs an act
where the act has created the peril that confronts the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A person cannot be convicted for failing to act even though he or she has a duty to act IF

A

he or she is unaware of the need to act

or does not have the physical capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mens rea

A

the “guilty” mind and/or the traditional name for mental state requirement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

MPC four levels of intentionality to be used as mens rea tests

A

Purpose
Knowledge
Recklessness
Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mens rea - MPC - Purpose

A

Accused’s “conscious object” was to commit criminal act charged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mens rea - MPC - Knowledge

A

Accused was aware that nature of conduct was like that charged or was “practically certain” that it would cause criminal result

17
Q

Mens rea - MPC - recklessness

A

accused “consciously” disregarded substantial and unjustifiable risk of committing or causing criminal act which was “gross deviation” from what reasonable person would do

18
Q

Mens rea - MPC - negligence

A

Accused “should” have been aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk of committing or causing criminal act which was “gross deviation” from what reasonable person would do

19
Q

Recklessness v. Negligence - MPC -Mens rea

A

Recklessness, accused has to actually be aware of risk of criminal conduct, while for negligence, accused merely should have been aware

20
Q

general intent

A

when conviction requires only proof of intent to commit act that causes the harm

21
Q

specific intent

A

when proof is required of an additional intent beyond committing act that causes the harm

22
Q

sufficiency

A

intoxication or drugged condition must be so extreme that accused did not possess prescribed mens rea

23
Q

causation

A

actual (but for) causation + legal causation

24
Q

actual (but for) causation

A

But for the accused’s actions, would criminal result have occurred when it did?
multiple actors - more than one person may be actual cause of same criminal result

25
Q

legal causation

A

test - various names; focus on reasonable foreseeability and intervening or supervening causes that “break the causation chain”

26
Q

legal causation - MPC

A

was result “too remote or accidental?”

27
Q

common law - murder

A

killing another human being with “malice aforethought”

28
Q

maliceaforethought

A

refers to a particularly heinous ill will on the part of the killer. Wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, wanton conduct…

29
Q

manslaughter

A

killing another human being without “malice aforethought”

30
Q

Expressed murder

A

proof of malicious thoughts or activity

31
Q

implied murder

A

implied from gross recklessness or extreme indifference to value of human life

32
Q

presumption

A

often presumed where use of deadly weapon on vital part of victims body

33
Q

2 elements of homicide crimes

A

killing act causing death of human being and specific mens rea

34
Q

first degree murder

A

need premeditation and deliberation

- this is the actual prior thought and reflection

35
Q

Second degree

A

malice without premeditation and deliberation