Crim law (MBE) Flashcards

1
Q

How many types of homicide are there?

A

Two: murder (4 subs-needs INTENT) and manslaughter (2 subs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the types of murders?

A

(1) intent to kill; (2) intent to inflict serious bodily injury; (3) felony murder; (4) depraved heart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define (1) intent to kill

Murder

A

The crime is PREMEDITATED ++ there must be EXPRESS specific intent to kill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define (2) intent to inflict serious bodily injury

Murder

A

Person intended to inflict such serious bodily injury BUT the person ended up dying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define (3) felony murder

Murder

A

Death resulting from committing dangerous felony (BARRK)

B: battery
A: arson
R: rape
R: robbery
K: kidnapping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define (4) depraved heart

Murder

A

Reckless disregard of human life

Reckless disregard = “knew or should have known” that death could happen an acted anyway. Synonym: malice/malicious

ONLY general intent murder (does not need a mental state)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many types of manslaughter are there?

A

Two: (1) voluntary, and (2) involuntary

Remember these are both general intent (no mental state needed, just whether the death happen and how)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define (1) voluntary manslaughter

A

There was ADEQUATE provocation, that out you in the HEAT of passion, leaving you NO TIME to cool off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define (2) involuntary manslaughter

A

There was negligent conduct that caused a death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the difference b/w Murder (4) depraved heart - reckless AND manslaughter (2) involuntary - negligent?

A

Reckless behavior: PEOPLE are around

Negligent: NO people around

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SPECIFIC intent crimes (not homicide)

A

There are 2: inchoate crimes and property crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of inchoate crimes

A

Three: (1) attempt; (2) conspiracy; and (3) solicitation.

Note: it CANNOT be a joke, dare, bluff. It has to be real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(1) Attempt

inchoate crimes

A

criminal intent to commit the crime AND overt act or substantial step toward completing it.

In sum: facts say you want to do it, and you take steps towards it (EVEN if you later regret it/return/etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Example: is this an attempt?

A

Karla R wanted to steal a lighter, grabbed it from the table BUT then she decided not to.

Attempt? YES b/c all elements are met!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(2) conspiracy

Inchoate crimes

A

2+ people agree to commit a crime (**ALL ** people MUST have the SPECIFIC criminal intent to commit such crime).

In sum: there has to be an AGREEMENT w/intent to commit the crime

It cannot be that only one person has the intent

i.e. if a cop is trying to set me up to commit a crime, and we make an agreement to commit such crime –> NO CL conspiracy b/c only I had the intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MPC (model penal code) unilateral theory of conspiracy

A

Liable if ONE person (on their own) commits to commit the crim (has the intent to do so).

No need for a group intent

Under this, if a cop is trying to set me up to commit a crime, and we make an agreement to commit such crime –> YES MPC conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Co-conspirator rule

CL

A

Once there is a conspiracy, any crime committed by ONE makes everyone else liable (whether others committed it or not) IF:
the crime committed is in furtherance of the conspiracy (forseeable from the conspiracy).

The crime has to be related to the conspiracy

i.e. Norby and Rod-Dod conspire to commit armed robbery; they go to the chosen bank and change their mind, but accidentally Rod-dod’s gun goes off and shoots a guard - both guilty?

18
Q

Withdrawal

Conspiracy

A

You CAN withdraw from committing the crime(s) IF, before commititng the crime(s), you provide NOTICE to your co-conspirator(s) OR law enforcement.

Always guilty of conspiracy, even when withdrawing from the crime itself

19
Q

(3) Solicitation

inchoate crimes

A

You offer, entice, motivate or encourage someone else to commit a crime w/INTENT that they do so

20
Q

What are the types of property crimes?

specific intent crimes

A

Burglary, larceny, robbery, assault
Larceny by trick and false pretenses
Embezzlement
Accomplice liability (before the fact)
Accessory AFTER the fact

21
Q

Burglary

Property-specific intent crime

A

**Breaking and entering the dwelling of another @Night w/INTENT to commit a felony **

Breaking = any opening/enlarging of an entryway
Entering = any part of the body in the dwelling (even your pinky counts)
Dwelling = someone lives there
Intent = requires the mental state BUT does not require you sctually completing the crime.

22
Q

Larceny

Property-specific intent crime

A

Trespassory taking away of personal property w/intent to permanently deprive

Trespassory= carrying/touching property w/o your permission
Taking away = move it (even an inch)

Never worry about about what happens AFTER person moves the thing w/Intent

23
Q

Robbery

Property-specific intent crime

A

Intentionally taking personal property w/FORCE/intimidation or fear

Look at this from the victim’s POV (even a belief of fear would be sufficient)

24
Q

Assault

Property-specific intent crime

A

Intent to commit a battery OR
place another in imminent apprehension of a harmful contact-WORDS alone are NOT enough

MUST have evidence of apprehension (a bat, gun, knife, etc.)

25
Larceny by trick | Property-specific intent crime
Taking POSESSION by miserepresenting a fact (lying). Posession is the KEY element - no matter how long you have the property, you ONLY possess it unless fact patter tells you you have title (then, different rule) | This is the default when someone takes by misrepresentation
26
False pretenses | Property-specific intent crime
Obtaining TITLE by misrepresenting a fact MUST show title (facts must give you some piece of paper evidencing ownership/title) ## Footnote 2 ways to show: a buy-sell transaction OR a scam sale/fraudulent transaction
27
Embezzlement | Property-specific intent crime
You were holding/protecting someone's property (so initially had legal possession) BUT you then converted it for your own use | Think pawn-shop guy holding your jewelry (lawful posess.) and selling it
28
Accomplice liability (accessory BEFORE the fact) | Property-specific intent crime
You **AID & ABET** (so you help) someone to achieve a crime + +you have the INTENT that they commit the crime | IF you aid & abet = guilty of the crime itself (if completed)
29
Accessory AFTER the fact | Property-specific intent crime
You know someone committed a crime and **HELP them EVADE** arrest or prosecution | Knowing of the crime alone is not enough ## Footnote You are not guilty of the crime the person committed
30
General intent crimes | ++ what buzz words do not ID these and the crimes
NO intent needed, just the elements/def of the crimes Wrong buzz words: "willfully," "knowingly" or "intentionally" (b/c these denote intent!!) | BARK: Battery, Arson, Rape, and Kidnapping
31
Battery | General intent crime
Unlawful application of force - there must be CONTACT, even by accident ## Footnote i.e. I accidentally bump into you and you fell and broke your leg
32
Arson | General intent crime
MALICIOUS (reckless - "knew or should have known") burning of the dwelling of ANOTHER
33
Rape & Kidnapping | General intent crime
These are crimes where they will give you a statute for interpretation or to see whether it happened or not
34
DEFENSES | To general and specific intent crimes
(1) voluntary intoxication; (2) insanity; (3) mistake; (4) legal impossibility
35
(1) Voluntary intoxication | Defense
Applies to: specific intent only Not a defense for: reckless crimes (general intent)
36
(2) Insanity | Defense
MBE= McNaughton - You have a mental disease that PREVENTS you from appreciating the nature or quality of what you are doing (from perceiving your actions as wrong) | Applies to: ????
37
(3) Mistake I | Defense to specific intent
ANY mistake is a defense (b/c you did not have the requisite mental state)
38
(3) Mistake II | Defense to General intent
Mistake must be REASONABLE to be a defense for general intent crimes
39
(4) Legal impossibility | Defense
No matter what you did/wanted to do you did NOT commit a crime ## Footnote i.e. they try to get you for arson, but you burn your own home... not that crime so legally impossible (you just cray)
40
Compare factual impossibility | NOT a defense ## Footnote Compare to legal impossibility
You committed the crime but the "facts" were not what you thought... you are still guilty | Guilty b/c elements of the crime are met ## Footnote i.e. you went out w/someone that said was 21y and had sex, but turns out the person is 18... -- statutory rape (SOL)