Crim L - 5A Flashcards
5A Generally
Privilege against self-incrimination protects against government-coerced confessions
5A: When may D refuse to answer a question
Whenever his response might result in self-incrimination or reasonable possibility of contributing to his criminal conviction
5A: What must D do for questioning to stop
D must assert right to silence or right to counsel
What type of evidence is governed by 5A
Compelled testimonial evidence
Physical evidence not protected e.g. body, voice sample, line up, handwriting
What types of voluntary statements after Miranda warning may be admissible as fruit
Independent source
Inevitable discovery
Intervening act by D
Impeachment
Ways to eliminate privilege against self-incrimination and compel answers
Use and derivative immunity: testimony and derived evidence can’t be used against D
Transactional immunity: complete protection from prosecution on related crimes for self-incriminating testimony
Extinguish by waiver: D waives and takes the stand
No possibility of incrimination - e.g. statute of limitation runs out
For a self-incriminating statement to be admissible under 14 A DPC, it must be
Free and voluntary as determined by TOTC (not motivated by police coercion or official pressure)
When must Miranda warning be given to enable D’s statement to be admissible under 5A privilege against self-incrimination (in P’s case or to establish PC)
Before any custodial interrogation.
No exceptions even for minor crimes
What does it mean to be in custody
Reasonable person in PO’s presence feels he is not free to leave. Generally formal arrest or restraint
Traffic detention to office drop are non-custodial. Guns drawn are.
What does it mean to be under interrogation
Reasonable PO knows/should know he is reasonably likely to elicit incriminating response
Routine question (booking, probation interview) is not considered interrogation
Even if no interrogation, what must D’s statement still satisfy to be admissible under 5A privilege against self-incrimination
14A DPC voluntariness
Does Miranda forbid strategic deception?
No. Miranda forbids coercion, not strategic deception.
Warning not required when suspect is unaware he is speaking to a police informant (or non-PO) who relays statement and gives voluntary stmt
What is the only result of Miranda violation
Admissibility in P’s case in chief
Ok to use to impeach credibility of D’s testimony, x-exam etc.
What does right to silence forbid
P’s negative comments on D’s silence or failure to testify.
Drawing adverse inference subjects any conviction to “harmless error test” (conviction not overturned if other overwhelming evidence)