crim 201 Flashcards

1
Q

sources of legal doctrine

A
  • legislation
  • case law
  • value judgements of the community
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

elements of a crime

A
  • actus reus
  • mens rea
  • concurrence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

types of defences

A
  1. i did not commit the offence (actus reus and mens rea)

2. formal defences (ie self defence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

formula for a crime

A

actus reus + mens rea (and a lack of defence) = crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what can be included in actus reus?

A
  • conduct crimes eg assault
  • consequence crimes (requires cause and consequence) eg murder
  • status crime eg possesion
  • circumstances eg rape
  • omissions eg failure to fulfill duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what can be included in mens rea?

A
  • intention (desire or knowledge that it is a virtually certain consequence of their actions)
  • knowledge (consciously accept the circumstance)
  • recklessness (knowledge that it is a probable outcome)
  • negligence (a reasonable person would have been aware of the risk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

subjective or objective mens rea

A

subjective mens rea = to do with the state of mind of the accused
objective = accused judged by standards other than themselves (ie reasonable person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

strict vs absolute liability

A

strict liability = no mens rea requirement but has the defence of due diligence
absolute liability = no mens rea requirement and no defence of due diligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

actus reus, the voluntary conduct principal

A
  1. kilbride v lake 1962
  2. Tifaga v department of labour 1980
  3. Ryan v R 1967
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

actus reus omissions

A
  1. R v Evans 2009 when a person has created or contributed to the creation of a state which he knows, or ought to reasonably know, has become life threatening, a consequence duty on him to act by taking reasonable steps to save the other’s life will normally arise.
  2. R v Witika 1993 where there is , by reason of a relationship, a positive duty to intervene then…deliberate failure to exercise that duty to take steps to avoid the commission of the offence…may be enough…as amounting to encouragement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly