Creating the Construction Contract Flashcards
Why are agreements to agree not legally recognized in general contract law?
Because they lack certainty
Construction industry exceptions to agreements to agree not being legally recognized
They accept letters of intent
Letter of intent
After entering contract A the owner can communicate success to bidder through letter of intent. Often formal execution of contract B follows delivery of letter of intent
Why does construction industry recognize letter of intent?
Often work commences on the basis of the letter and work compensable on basis of letter
Letter of intent binding contract?
Could become one if all important terms from contract B are in the letter, delivered, and owner signs and returns
Cases where letter of intent not binding
If execution of contract B is a condition of the bargain
Meeting of the minds
If execution of formal contract is simply repeating something already agreed to in letter of intent will demonstrate meeting of the minds (if contract A and letter than hard to say it is not a contract even if not contract B)
Formal elements of a contract
- Must be consideration
- Do not need to be in writing to be enforceable unless mandated by statute
Exception for rule that there must be consideration in construction
Construction contracts made under seal (if not under seal must be consideration)
Consideration for contract B
- Owner: promise of payment
- Contractor: promise to construct project to specification
Effect of absence of agreement on price to consideration?
- Does not mean no consideration
- Court has implied a promise by owner to pay reasonable renumeration
What if owner doesn’t pay reasonable renumeration?
Can bring a quantum meruit action
Quantum meruit action
quasi contractual term that requires payment of reasonable amount of money for work done
Other type of consideration
When owner gives contractor some right in the property or benefit
Consideration that operates in the negative
loss taken by the other party (ex: I will take a penalty instead of you)
Adequacy of consideration?
Largely irrelevant (exception: inadequacy so gross there is evidence of fraud)
Exception to contracts do not need to be in writing to be enforceable unless mandated by statute
Provincial lien legislation is an exception to the usual statutory rule
Normal vs lien legislation for writing requirement
Normal= contracts for land have to be in writing
Lien legislation= interest in land created upon commencement of work (when first shovel hits the ground lien rights created)
Agreements that do have to be in writing
contract to answer for a debt, default or miscarriage of another person (construction bonds must be in writing)
Requirement to be in writing satisfied if:
Essential elements are in writing
Illegal Contracts
- Contracts made contrary to statutory requirements
- In private contracts may still be enforceable
Factors to consider for illegal contracts
- Purpose of the law it violates: whether the law intends to make a contract inherently illegal or only illegal because outside of statute?
- Can illegal portion be severed?
Illegal contracts: In municipalities you have licensing requirements to protect the public from unskilled contractors
If contractor fails to obtain license then illegal but if contractor can demonstrate knowledge, skill and requirements then public doesn’t need the license
CCDC General Conditions
set out the general duties and obligations of the parties to the contract—represent an industry norm
CCDC Precedence of Contract Documents
Have different sections and rank sections based on what takes precedent when interpreting to assist in the event of contradiction between terms
CCDC contain specifications
precise details of work to be performed (normally prepared by design professionals)
CCDC specs met by contractor
- Contractor who builds project as per specifications will not be liable for damages due to improper design
- No implied warranty for fitness for use
- Will be liable if guaranteed a certain result
Contractor duty with design
If design contains obvious errors contractor owes a duty to the owner to recognize defects and warn owner of danger that is inherent in executing the design
Contractor facing additional work as a result of specs
If contractor faces additional work as a result of the specifications wrongly prescribing an inappropriate construction method, the contract will be compensated for those as extras to the contract
Intent of parties
Read in terms of words used and circumstances at the time it was entered into
Where provision is clear or unambiguous
no extrinsic factors may be considered to vary or change interpretation of intention
Where provision not clear
court will interpret in a way that gives meaning to all terms in question
Contra proferentem
if you drafted the contract with ambiguity that court interpretation can’t solve, it will be resolved against your interest
Implied terms in contract B
- Owner will make site acceptable for contractor to perform the work
- Contractor will complete the work within a reasonable period of time
- Contractor will perform its duties diligently and in a workmanlike manner
- Contractors work will comply with codes and building obligations
Implied terms in contract A
- Treat all bidders fairly and equally
- Only accept compliant bids
Specific implied term for dwelling
Implied term that it will be fit for human habitation
Specific implied term for cost-plus
implied term limiting the contractor to costs reasonably incurred
Bhasin v Hyrnew
Facts: B sold products for CanAm (try to force merger)
Ratios:
-Duty to act honestly (don’t lie/knowingly mislead) and in good faith (can still be self serving but cannot undermine in bad faith) in performance contracts
Contractor and subcontractor
Absent provision to the contrary, contractor free to enter into sub-contracts
Contractor and subcontractor incorporating contract B
Contracts can expressly incorporate contract B into sub-contracts but they are not required to (if not subs not bound to B)
Pay when paid clause
- subcontractor not entitled to payment except to the extent that has been paid by the owner for the same work/materials
- Must be clear and specific
- Cannot be relied on if reason not paid was contractors doing
Relationship between sub and owner
- No privity of contract
- Sub cannot sue for breach or demand payment
Unjust enrichment
- Very rare case where sub has claim against the owner
- One party enriched at expense of another in unjust circumstance
Winnipeg Condo Corp v Bird Construction
Facts: Masonry
Ratio: contractors, subs and others who take part in design/construction owe a duty of care to subsequent purchasers if it can be shown that it was reasonably foreseeable that failure to take reasonable care in construction of a building would create defects that would pose a real and substantial danger to health and safety of occupants