Creating A Welfare State 1918-1979 Flashcards
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Welfare provision in 1918
- Based primarily on the workhouse
- Old age pensions, unemployment, sickness benefits had been introduced to limited degree
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Workhouses
- Principal form of social service for elderly, sick, and destitute
- Most had hospitals attached
- Abolished by Local Government Act of 1929
- Closed by 1930
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Unemployment Insurance Acts of 1920 & 1921
Extended unemployment insurance to cover most workers for 15 weeks
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Justification for Unemployment Insurance Acts of 1920 & 1921
- Need to support unprecedentedly high levels of unemployment
- Fears that widespread poverty may lead to revolution like in Russia in 1917
- Popular desire to support former servicemen and their families
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Retrenchments in Welfare Provision in the 1930s
- Onset of Great Depression = more demand on welfare provision
- Welfare less affordable due to reduced tax revenue (more workers unemployed) = vicious cycle
- Aim of successive governments was to retrench in line with provision of May Report of 1931
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
National Economy Act 1931
- Significantly reduced entitlement to & provision of benefits
- Introduced means test for those whose insurance entitlement had run out
- Placed 6 moth cap, after which benefits had to be reapplied for
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Means Test
- Took all household income into consideration when assessing benefit - included child’s income & elderly pension
- Bitterly resented as humiliating and unfair
- Attracted official & unofficial snoopers who checked on claimants to ensure destitution
- Any suspected of abusing the system could have benefits cancelled
- 1932 National Hunger March = 3000 unemployed men walked to London to demand end to means test & start of job provision
The Extent and Nature of Social Welfare Provision 1918-1939
Hunger Marches
- Many joined these walks from their homes, usually in depressed areas, to London to publicise their plight
- 1936 Jarrow March: hundreds marched to London, but their benefits were cut during the journey due to not registering for work
- Jarrow = impoverished shipbuilding town in North-East
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The Impact of WWII
- State increasingly took responsibility for people’s welfare during war - organisation of evacuations, rationing, ensuring health
- Increasing agreement that there should be no return to pre-war poverty
- 1942 Beveridge Report = blueprint for post-war social welfare
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The Beveridge Report
- Asserted 5 giants that needed to be overcome if social conditions were to improve
- 5 Giants = squalor, ignorance, want, idleness, disease
- Advocated universal benefits & end to means test
- Beveridge argued for flat rate of contributions from all wage earners to pay for comprehensive welfare benefits - covering unemployment, sickness, pensions, and family based benefits
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The work of the Labour Government 1945-1951
- Credited with creation of modern Welfare State
- Widespread new provisions led to idea that state would care for citizens ‘from the cradle to the grave’
- Crucial factor with the post-war consensus
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
Family Allowances Act 1945
- Created monetary child benefits for the first time
- Payable to the mother, not the father - non-working mothers gained income independent of their husbands
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The National Insurance Act 1946
- Made unemployment benefits and sickness benefits available to all workers
- Paid state pension to all men over 65 and all women over 60
- £1 for single people and £1.75 for married couples
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The Industrial Injuries Act 1946
Gave workers the right to be compensated by the Ministry of National Insurance for accidents and injuries in the workplace
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The National Assistance Act 1948
- Offered welfare benefits to those who were not covered by National Insurance
- The homeless, the disabled, unmarried mothers, and pensioners living in poverty were able to claim
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
Creation of the National Health Service 1948
NHS offered free and comprehensive health cover for all, funded from compulsory National Insurance scheme taken directly from wages
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
The Welfare Consensus 1939-1964
- Broad agreement between major parties over role of state and provision of welfare
- Cons. OMs 1951-1964 supported maintenance of welfare provision
- Some members of Cons. party (eg. Treasury minister Enoch Powell) advocated cuts in welfare, but were in a minority
The Impact of War, the Labour gov., and Consensus 1939-1964
PM Macmillan (1957-1964) on Welfare
- Agreed there should be not return to pre-war poverty
- Believed wealthier classes had moral responsibility to help provide for those in poverty
- Understood that any cuts to welfare would be unpopular and lose electoral support
Reasons for Increasing Challenges to state welfare provision 1964-1979
The New Right
- Political consensus over welfare provision began to break down in early 1970s
- NR suppoerters argued social welfare trapped people in dependency culture
- Argued growing welfare bills were diverting resources from economic growth - undermining GB’s long-term economic performance
Reasons for Increasing Challenges to state welfare provision 1964-1979
Welfare provision 1964-1979
- Labour gov 1964-1970 refused to cut welfare - increased tax to pay for it
- Cons. gov 1970-1974 appeared equally committed to it
- 1970 Family Income Supplement: for poorer families, offered means tested rebates
Reasons for Increasing Challenges to state welfare provision 1964-1979
The National Insurance Act 1970
- Introduced generous package of welfare benefits - extended welfare
- Gave pension rights to 100K who had not been covered by 1948 National Assistance Act
- Introduced attendance allowance for people who needed long-term care at home
- Established invalidity benefit for disabled people
- Increased child allowance given to mothers
- Made rent subsidies available for low-income families in private accomodation
Reasons for Increasing Challenges to state welfare provision 1964-1979
Challenges to welfare provision
- Many felt it was wrong for taxpayers to pay for welfare benefits
- Many felt it was inefficient way of spending money due to no tangible benefits - economic problems worsened, they felt the gov should retrench
- Many argued welfare caused dependency - people could no longer help themselves, eg. by finding work
Reasons for Increasing Challenges to state welfare provision 1964-1979
Increased Costs
- As part of terms of 1976 IMF loan, Labour gov had to retrench and cut welfare budget
- Emerging consensus that GB could no longer afford to provide welfare ‘from the cradle to the grave’
- Former consensus replaced by a new one of reduced welfare provision
Reasons for Increasing Challenges to state welfare provision 1964-1979
Changing Attitudes
- Many younger people less inclined to endorse collectivist thinking that emerged from GD & WWII - supported policies favouring the individual, not the community
- Many criticised welfare claimants as ‘scroungers’ irrespective of individual circumstances
- ‘Aspirational’ working class - goals were to increase standard of living, buying own homes, and enjoying consumerism - little sympathy for policies that meant higher taxes
- When Thatcher became Cons. leader in 1975, she embraced NR thinking onwelfare - hoping to appeal to aspirational voters
Health Provision 1918-1945
Ministry of Health
- Established in 1919
- Responsible for co-ordinating health at a regional level and administering funds raised by National Health Insurance scheme
Health Provision 1918-1945
Local Government Act 1929
- Introduced by Minister of Health Neville Chamberlain - most important medical reform of 1920s
- Passed responsibility for Poor Law hospitals to local authorities
- Made local authorities also responsible for areas such as running of venereal disease clinics, child welfare, dentistry, schools’ medical services, and school meals
Health Provision 1918-1945
Hospitals
- Various forms of hospital provision in inter-war period
- Public infirmaries managed by local authorities
- Charitable hospitals which relied on public subscriptions
- Specialist teaching hospitals
- Private hospitals
- Sickness insurance schemes did not normally fund hospital treatment for dependants (eg. wives, children)
Health Provision 1918-1945
GPs
- Most charged for diagnosis and treatment - some treated poorer patients for free
- Many, known as ‘panel’ doctors, trated those covered by National Insurance schemes - only covered employee for treatments, not his family
Health Provision 1918-1945
Healthcare in the Depression
- Less than half were insured against illness in 1929
- The uninsured were supposed to rely on private health insurance - if they could afford it
- Traditional remedies and medicines sold over the counter were common
- In most deprived parts of GB (eg. Tyneside), poor livind conditions led to higher incidences of illness and premature death