CRA Data Review Timeframes and Sampling Guidelines Flashcards
What size banks are required to collect and report CRA data?
Large institutions are required to collect and report CRA data, whereas small institutions (including intermediate small banks) are not required to collect data for CRA evaluation purposes.
In addition, certain institutions are required to collect
and report home mortgage loans for purposes of the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). Other institutions may choose to provide data regarding their loans, including the census tract locations and borrower incomes or business revenues, similar to the data requirement for large institutions and HMDA reporters.
For banks that Collect and Report HMDA and CRA Data, what must examiners do before using the data?
Examiners must validate the accuracy of the data. Including a HMDA validation (using HMDA validation procedures) and for other CRA data, examiners should validate the necessary fields needed for CRA analysis.
What data fields are necessary to validate for CRA analysis? (4)
HMDA data using HMDA procedures
CRA data (Small business, consumer, or small farm) including:
- Loan type
- Loan amt
- location
- income/revenue
For bank’s that collect/report data, what years should be analyzed?
Any exceptions?
What data should be presented?
If loan data is considered accurate, all collected/reported data for each full calendar year since the previous CRA examination should be analyzed. This includes the year of the last examination.
Exception for Small banks operating on a 48-72 month evaluation cycle. In this instance examiners should analyze the most recent two full calendar years of HMDA and/or collected CRA data.
At a minimum examiners should present the latest full calendar year of data for which aggregate data is available. Presentation of additional years may be useful to support conclusions and should be considered if ratings are borderline, unfavorable, if there are anomalies between years, complaints, or upon bank request.
In what situations would it be appropriate to evaluates partial calendar year data?
It would only be appropriate to analyze partial calendar year data when there is a short evaluation cycle, such as a previous adverse CRA rating or a de novo institution. In these cases, a separate analysis should
be conducted for each partial year.
Even though each AA must be analyzed separately, in what cases can multiple AAs be combined in the PE for presentation purposes? (2)
In instances where two or more AAs consist of non-contiguous (not connected) portions in the Non MSA area of one State and no anomalies are present.
In cases where there are multiple AAs in the same MSA or CSA.
For banks that do not collect and Report HMDA or CRA Data, what must examiners do before using the data?
For institutions where data is not collected for a particular product under review sampling must be performed.
For bank’s that don’t collect/report data, what years should be analyzed?
What years should be presented?
For institutions where data is not collected for a particular product under review and sampling must be performed, the analysis should cover the lending activity in the previous full calendar year that is prior to the start of the examination. Reasons to analyze and present additional years of data are a borderline
overall rating, a significant overall ratings change, an
unfavorable rating at any level, or CRA complaints. In addition, examiners should confirm with bank management that a one-year sample of a loan product would be representative of the entire evaluation period. In cases where more than one year will be analyzed, a separate analysis should be conducted
for each year.
What exceptions exist to presenting and analyzing data by a full calendar year for bank’s that don’t collect or report CRA data?
Exceptions may exist to analyzing data by full calendar year, particularly for institutions that purge their loan system of paid off loans. In situations where the paid off loans are purged and using the previous full calendar year data would not capture the bank’s actual lending performance, a universe comprised of the most recent 12 months may be appropriate.
What timeframes should be analyzed and presented for Community Development data?
Community development data (loans, investments, and services) should be reviewed for the entire CRA evaluation cycle.
What is the process for validating Community Development Data?
The extent of validation that the activities qualify will depend on the number of activities. With large volumes, often the process of validation will include reviewing the process the bank goes through to qualify a particular activity and validating a sample following the CRA Sample Size table. If the number of activities is smaller, often the entire universe should be reviewed to ensure the activities qualify as community development.
Are Small Institutions and ISBs required to collect HMDA and CRA data?
Neither area required to collect small business or small farm data.
Some banks will still collected HMDA data, but not all collect or report.
What method should examiners use to evaluate CRA or HMDA data for bank’s that do not collect or report?
Examiners should use sampling to draw conclusions from a random sub set up a universe for each loan type and apply such conclusions to the population as a whole.
This includes for large institutions that don’t collect consumer loan data, as long as consumer lending makes up a substantial portion of the lending portfolio (over 50%).
What should examiners do in instances where the collected data is invalid and the bank is unable to correct the data prior to the examination?
Examiners should sample to evaluate the bank’s CRA performance. Specifically the most recent two full calendar years.
What should examiners determine prior to selecting a sample? (3)
- The major product lines from which to sample
- The total number of loans in the universe for each product category, by year.
- The number of loans to be sampled for each year (using the sample size table)