Court of appeal powers Flashcards
What is the general rule about the COA
Its bound by its own past decisions
what is the date the Young v Bristol aeroplane case was eastablished?
1944
List the structure of a COA powers answer
General rule each court may persuade eachother Decisions from courts above (denning + stare decisis confirmation) COA exceptions in youngs case Other powers to depart
State the names of cases in the COA powers
Broome v Cassell & Rookes V bannard Schorsch meier and milinagoes & havannah railways Williams V fawcett REA R v Taylor R v Gould
Describe the facts in Bromme v Cassell
Denning refused to follow Rookes V bannard and the HOL overruled and said that he was absolutely bound by all courts above
Describe the facts in Schorsch Meier and Miliangoes
Denning refused to follow havannah railways in both these cases and HOL reversed their own decision because he was right, however he was still wrong to go against stare decisis.
On the basis of damages being rewarded in Stirling
What principle does REA support
That the COA criminal and civil do not bind each other but can persuade
When can the COA depart from their own previous decisions
> Conflicting decisions of the HOL where the HOL overrules COA decision
Conflicting decisions in the COA ie. distinguishing of different precedents
Per incurium (williams v fawcett)
describe the facts of williams v fawcett
the paper work failed to specify the breaches or grant of adjournment and was sort per incurium
What are the other powers the COA have to depart from past decisions
Criminal devision exception
Distinguish (balfour and merrit)
Confliction with the ECHR where its compatible with human rights and they must overrule
Give three reasons why the COA powers should be extended
> Its the final appeal court, allows them to rule out bad law
More experienced than HOL more expertise
Saves time and money
Give three reasons why the COA powers should not be extended
> Cause more uncertainty by conflicting decisions
Judge made law
Breakdown in system of precedent
Increased number of appeals through conflicting precedents