Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Castellain vs. Preston

A

Subject-matter of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rozanes vs. Bowen

A

The assured must make a full disclosure to the underwriter without being asked of all the material circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Carter vs. Boehm

A

The underwriter trusts the proposers’ representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Kettlewell vs. Refuge Assurance Company

A

Misleading an insured about a policy cover is a breach of utmost good faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Roselodge vs. Castle

A

The judge ridiculed the insurer’s suggestion that the fact the proposer was caught stealing when he was 12 would be material to an application for insurance many years later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Oei vs. Foster

A

Chip-pan fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Coles vs. Hetherton

A

Insurers seeking vehicle repair costs at the market rate, when work was carried out by their own repair network at a discounted rate, was lawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Currie vs. Misa

A

Definition of consideration - each person’s side of the bargain which supports the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dalby vs. The India and London Life Assurance Company

A

There need be no value insurable interest at the time of a claim for a life insurance policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gloystarne & Co Ltd. vs. Mr G S Martin

A

Apparent (ostensible) authority - for an agent that claims to act on behalf of a principal it takes the principal’s conduct to indicate that the agent is acting on their behalf, or if they don’t have authority to carry out certain tasks, the way to determine whether a contract is valid is if the actions carried out by the agent is of the kind that is usual in the trade or profession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Household Fire Insurance Co. vs. Grant

A

The rule that contract acceptance is made when the letter of acceptance is posted applies even if the letter is delayed, lost or destroyed in the post and never reaches the offeror

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hyde vs. Wrench

A

Conditional acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Leyland Shipping vs. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society

A

Causation is not a chain but a net, proximate cause is proximate in efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lister vs. Romford Ice and Cold Storage Ltd.

A

Cannot pursue subrogation rights against a fellow employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lucena vs. Craufurd

A

The law will not allow that the man due to inherit an estate has any interest, or anything more than a mere expectation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Marsden vs. City & County Insurance Co.

A

It was not inevitable that a crowd would gather and riot after the fire

17
Q

North British and Mercantile vs. Liverpool London and Globe, known as Queen and King Canaries

A

Contribution only applies where the policies cover a common interest in the subject-matter, i.e. the insurable interest is the same

18
Q

Pawsey vs. Scottish Union and National

A

Proximate cause means the active, efficient cause that brings about a chain of events without the intervention of any new force

19
Q

Williams vs. Baltic Assurance Association

A

No evidence for interest subsisting at the time of inception, must be a reasonable expectation of acquiring interest

20
Q

Yorkshire Insurance Co. vs. Nisbet Shipping Co.

A

Insurers not entitled to recover more through subrogation than they have paid out, e.g. through exchange rates