Cost Accounting Flashcards
Under the FIFO method, Albany Mining’s equivalent units of production (EUP) with respect to conversion costs are
A. 171,200 units.
B. 184,000 units.
C. 196,800 units.
D. 177,600 units.
C. 196,800 units.
Under the FIFO method, EUP are determined based only on work performed during the current period. Thus, units in beginning work-in-process must be excluded.
Hoyt Co. manufactured the following units:
Manufacturing costs totaled $99,000. What amount should Hoyt debit to finished goods?
A. $95,400
B. $93,600
C. $90,000
D. $99,000
B. $93,600
Normal spoilage occurs under normal operating conditions and should be treated as a product cost. However, abnormal spoilage is not expected to occur and should be treated as a period cost because of its unusual nature. Consequently, the cost of abnormal spoilage is removed from the manufacturing costs based on the relative number of units spoiling abnormally. Thus, the amount debited to finished goods is $93,600 {$99,000 – [300 ÷ (5,000 + 200 + 300) × $99,000]}.
Fleet, Inc., manufactured 700 units of Product A, a new product, during the year. Product A’s variable and fixed manufacturing costs per unit were $6.00 and $2.00, respectively. The inventory of Product A on December 31 consisted of 100 units. There was no inventory of Product A on January 1. What would be the change in the dollar amount of inventory on December 31 if variable costing were used instead of absorption costing?
A. $800 decrease.
B. $200 increase.
C. $0
D. $200 decrease.
D. $200 decrease.
Given an inventory increase of 100 units during the year and the fixed manufacturing cost per unit of $2.00, $200 (100 units × $2.00) of overhead would be deferred using absorption costing but expensed immediately using variable costing. Thus, variable-costing inventory would be $200 less than absorption costing.
In computing the current period’s manufacturing cost per equivalent unit of production (EUP), the FIFO method of process costing considers current period costs
A. Less cost of beginning work-in-process (BWIP) inventory.
B. Only.
C. Plus cost of ending work-in-process (EWIP) inventory.
D. Plus cost of beginning work-in-process (BWIP) inventory.
B. Only.
An EUP is a set of inputs required to manufacture one physical unit. Calculating EUP for each factor of production facilitates measurement of output and cost allocation when work-in-process exists. Under the FIFO assumption, only current-period costs are allocated between cost of goods manufactured and ending work in process because FIFO maintains beginning inventory costs completely separable from current-period costs. The cost per EUP considers only current-period costs.
The primary difference between absorption and variable costing is that variable costing treats
A. Direct materials, direct labor, the variable portion of manufacturing overhead, and an allocated portion of fixed manufacturing overhead as product costs.
B. Only direct materials and direct labor as product cost.
C. Only direct materials, direct labor, the variable portion of manufacturing overhead, and the variable portion of selling and administrative expenses as product cost.
D. Only direct materials, direct labor, and the variable portion of manufacturing overhead as product costs.
D. Only direct materials, direct labor, and the variable portion of manufacturing overhead as product costs.
Variable costing treats only direct materials, direct labor, and the variable portion of manufacturing overhead as product costs.
Based on the following data, what is the gross profit for the company?
A. $600,000
B. $200,000
C. $400,000
D. $900,000
A. $600,000
In the computation of manufacturing cost per equivalent unit, the weighted-average method of process costing considers
A. Current costs plus cost of beginning work-in-process inventory.
B. Current costs only.
C. Current costs minus cost of beginning work-in-process inventory.
D. Current costs plus cost of ending work-in-process inventory.
A. Current costs plus cost of beginning work-in-process inventory.
The weighted-average method of process costing combines the costs of work done in the previous period and the current period. Thus, the cost of the EUP is equal to the current cost (current period) plus the cost of BWIP (previous period).
Wages earned by machine operators in producing the firm’s product should be categorized as
B.
Fact Pattern: At the end of its fiscal year, C.G. Manufacturing recorded the data below:
Using absorption (full) costing, C.G.’s inventoriable costs are
A. $1,080,000
B. $1,060,000
C. $800,000
D. $900,000
B. $1,060,000
Absorption costing is required by GAAP. It charges all costs of production to inventories. The prime costs ($800,000), variable manufacturing overhead ($100,000), and the fixed manufacturing overhead ($160,000) are included. They total $1,060,000.
A company with three products classifies its costs as belonging to five functions: design, production, marketing, distribution, and customer services. For pricing purposes, all company costs are assigned to the three products. The direct costs of each of the five functions are traced directly to the three products. The indirect costs of each of the five business functions are collected into five separate cost pools and then assigned to the three products using appropriate allocation bases. The allocation base that will most likely be the best for allocating the indirect costs of the distribution function is
A. Number of shipments.
B. Number of customer phone calls.
C. Dollar sales volume.
D. Number of sales persons.
A. Number of shipments.
Distribution is the transfer of goods from producers to customers or from distribution centers to merchandisers. Thus, distribution manages outflows, and purchasing manages inflows. Among the interrelated issues involved in distribution are (1) selection of distribution channels, (2) inventory placement, (3) means of transportation, (4) shipment schedules, (5) routes, and (6) carriers. Accordingly, the number of shipments is the cost driver most highly correlated with the incurrence of the indirect costs of distribution.
Fact Pattern: Whitehall Corporation produces chemicals used in the cleaning industry. During the previous month, Whitehall incurred $300,000 of joint costs in producing 60,000 units of AM-12 and 40,000 units of BM-36. Whitehall uses the units-of-production method to allocate joint costs. Currently, AM-12 is sold at split-off for $3.50 per unit. Flank Corporation has approached Whitehall to purchase all of the production of AM-12 after further processing. The further processing will cost Whitehall $90,000.
Concerning AM-12, which one of the following alternatives is most advantageous?
A. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $5.00.
B. Whitehall should continue to sell at split-off unless Flank offers at least $4.50 per unit after further processing, which covers Whitehall’s total costs.
C. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $5.25, which maintains the same gross profit percentage.
D. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $3.00, which covers the joint costs.
A. Whitehall should process further and sell to Flank if the total selling price per unit after further processing is greater than $5.00.
The unit price of the product at the split-off point is known to be $3.50, so the joint costs are irrelevant. The additional unit cost of further processing is $1.50 ($90,000 ÷ 60,000 units). Consequently, the unit price must be at least $5.00 ($3.50 opportunity cost + $1.50).
B. Whitehall should continue to sell at split-off unless Flank offers at least $4.50 per unit after further processing, which covers Whitehall’s total costs.
In the application of variable costing as a cost-allocation process in manufacturing,
A. Variable indirect costs are treated as product costs.
B. Nonvariable indirect costs are treated as product costs.
C. Variable direct costs are treated as period costs.
D. Nonvariable direct costs are treated as product costs.
A. Variable indirect costs are treated as product costs.
Variable costing considers only variable manufacturing costs to be product costs. Variable indirect costs included in variable overhead are therefore treated as inventoriable. Fixed costs are considered period costs and are expensed as incurred.
An entity develops computer programs to meet customers’ special requirements. How should the entity categorize payments to employees who develop these programs?
B.
During the month just ended, Delta Co. experienced scrap, normal spoilage, and abnormal spoilage in its manufacturing process. The cost of units produced includes
A. Normal spoilage, but neither scrap nor abnormal spoilage.
B. Scrap, but not spoilage.
C. Scrap and normal spoilage, but not abnormal spoilage.
D. Scrap, normal spoilage, and abnormal spoilage.
C. Scrap and normal spoilage, but not abnormal spoilage.
Scrap consists of direct material left over from the production process. It can either be sold, in which case it reduces factory overhead, or discarded, in which case it is absorbed into the cost of the good output. Normal spoilage occurs under normal operating conditions. Because it is expected under efficient operations, it is treated as a product cost. It is absorbed into the cost of the good output. Abnormal spoilage is not expected to occur under normal, efficient operating conditions. Abnormal spoilage is typically treated as a period cost (a loss).
The following information pertains to Syl Co.:
What is Syl’s breakeven point in sales dollars?
A. $160,000
B. $200,000
C. $50,000
D. $40,000
C. $50,000
The breakeven point in sales dollars is the fixed costs divided by the contribution margin ratio. Variable costs equal 20% of sales ($160,000 ÷ $800,000). Thus, the contribution margin ratio is 80%, and the breakeven point in dollars is $50,000 ($40,000 FC ÷ 80%).
A company has considerable excess manufacturing capacity. A special job order’s cost sheet includes the following applied manufacturing overhead costs:
The fixed costs include a normal $3,700 allocation for in-house design costs, although no in-house design will be done. Instead, the job will require the use of external designers costing $7,750. What is the total amount to be included in the calculation to determine the minimum acceptable price for the job?
A. $58,050
B. $54,000
C. $40,750
D. $36,700
C. $40,750
Given excess capacity, neither increased fixed costs nor opportunity costs are incurred by accepting the special order. Thus, the marginal cost of the order (the minimum acceptable price) is $40,750 ($33,000 variable costs + $7,750 cost of external design).
Information for the month of January concerning Department A, the first stage of Ogden Corporation’s production cycle, is as follows:
Materials are added at the beginning of the process. The ending work-in-process is 50% complete as to conversion costs. How would the total costs accounted for be distributed, using the weighted-average method?
C.
Fact Pattern: Regis Company manufactures plugs used in its manufacturing cycle at a cost of $36 per unit that includes $8 of fixed overhead. Regis needs 30,000 of these plugs annually, and Orlan Company has offered to sell these units to Regis at $33 per unit. If Regis decides to purchase the plugs, $60,000 of the annual fixed overhead applied will be eliminated, and the company may be able to rent the facility previously used for manufacturing the plugs.
If Regis Company purchases the plugs but does not rent the unused facility, the company would
A. Save $2.00 per unit.
B. Save $3.00 per unit.
C. Lose $3.00 per unit.
D. Lose $6.00 per unit.
C. Lose $3.00 per unit.
Exclusive of the fixed overhead, the unit cost of making the plugs is $28 ($36 total cost – $8 fixed OH). Purchasing the plugs will avoid $2 per unit of fixed overhead ($60,000 OH applied ÷ 30,000 units). Accordingly, $6 per unit of fixed overhead is unavoidable, and the relevant (avoidable) unit cost of making the plugs is $30 [$36 total cost – ($8 fixed OH – $2 avoidable cost)]. The purchase option therefore results in a $3-per-unit loss ($33 purchase price – $30 relevant cost).
A company manufactures two products, X and Y, through a joint process. The joint (common) costs incurred are $500,000 for a standard production run that generates 240,000 gallons of X and 160,000 gallons of Y. X sells for $4.00 per gallon, while Y sells for $6.50 per gallon. If there are no additional processing costs incurred after the split-off point, what is the amount of joint cost for each production run allocated to X on a physical-quantity basis?
A. $260,000
B. $300,000
C. $200,000
D. $240,000
B. $300,000
The company produces products X and Y in each production run at a joint cost of $500,000. No additional processing costs are incurred. To allocate the common cost on a physical-quantity basis means to distribute the costs based on each product’s pro-rata share of the total units produced. A production run produces 240,000 gallons of product X and 160,000 gallons of product Y, resulting in 400,000 total units. Thus, product X is allocated $300,000 of the cost [$500,000 × (240,000 ÷ 400,000)]. Product Y is allocated $200,000 [$500,000 × (160,000 ÷ 400,000)].