Corporations Flashcards
Piercing the Corporate Veil Examples
In extreme cases courts may pierce the corporate vale and hold some or all shareholders personally liable for the corporations debts.
1)
- Torts v. Contracts
- Fraud
- Inadequate Capitalization
- Zero Capital - Shareholder invests no money in Corp
- Siphoning - Initial funding is siphoned out as earned.
2)
Failure of Formalities: More likely to pierce the veil if shareholders have failed to follow corporate formalities.
Shareholder Liability (Intro)
Under the principal of limited liability, shareholders are generally not personally liable for the debts of the corporation. However, there are three circumstances where one may pierce the corporate veil and find shareholder liability. (Alter Ego, Undercapitalization, Avoidance of Existing Obligations)
Piercing the Corporate Veil
One may pierce the corporate veil to avoid fraud or unfairness. The three ways to expose shareholders to liability are: (1) Alter Ego; (2) Undercapitalization; (3) Avoidance of existing obligations.
Alter Ego
Alter ego exists where there is a shareholder who has failed to observe sufficient corporate formalities.
Undercapitalization
Shareholders who fail to maintain sufficient funds to cover foreseeable liabilities may be liable for undercapitalization.
Avoidance of Existing Obligations
The corporate veil may be pierced where it is necessary to prevent fraud or to prevent an individual shareholder from using the entity to avoid its existing personal obligations.
Directors and Officers: Duty of Care
A director/officer owes the corporation a duty of care, which is a fiduciary duty that requires a director to manage the corporation to the best of their ability. Thus, a director must act with (1) good faith; (2) As an ordinary prudent person would in the same or similar circumstances; (3) for the best interests of the corporation.
Directors and Officers: Duty to Manage
Directors have the duty to manage the corporation. Directors may delegate management functions to a committee of one or more directors that recommends action to the Board of Directors.
Business Judgment Rule
The Business Judgment Rule is a presumption that the directors manage the corporation in good faith and in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders. As such, directors will not be liable for innocent mistakes of business judgment.
Directors and Officers: Duty to Disclose
Directors have a duty to disclose material corporate information to other members of the Board of Directors.
Directors and Officers: Doctrine of Waste
Directors have a duty not to waste corporate assets by overpaying for property or employment services.
Directors and Officers: Duty of Loyalty
A director owed the corporation a duty of loyalty. A director may not receive an unfair benefit to the detriment of the corporation or its shareholders. There are three different types of breaches to the duty of loyalty: 1) Usuring corporate opportunities; 2) Interested director transactions; 3) Competing ventures.
Usurping corporate opportunities
A corporate opportunity is usurped when a director receives an unfair benefit by usurping for himself an opportunity which the corporation would have pursued.
Interested Director Transaction
An interested director transaction occurs when a director has a personal interest in a transaction in which the corporation is also a party.
Exception to Interested Director Transaction
Interested director transaction will be upheld if 1) a majority of disinterested directors approve the transaction; 2) a majority of disinterested shareholders with voting power approve the transaction; and 3) the transaction was reasonably fair to the corporation.
Competing Ventures
Under the duty of loyalty, directors are not permitted to engage in any personal business that is in direct conflict with the corporation.