Corporations Flashcards
The promoter is liable even after the corporation has been formed unless what occurs?
The promoter is liable even after the corporation has been formed unless:
(i) the corporation formally releases the promoter from responsibility through a novation,
(ii) the third party looks only to the corporation for performance, or
(iii) the promoter had no actual knowledge that the corporation’s charter has not yet been issued.
Under what theory can someone avoid personal liability when acting in good-faith in complying with the state’s incorporation requirements and operating his business as a corporation without knowing that the requirements were not met?
When a person makes a good-faith but unsuccessful effort to comply with the incorporation requirements, that person may be able to escape personal liability under the de facto corporation doctrine. In this case, the business entity is treated as a defacto corporation, and the owner is not personally liable for obligations incurred in the purported corporation’s name.
What is a corporation’s key constitutional document called and what must this document contain?
A corporation’s key constitutional document is called the Articles of Incorporation, and it must contain the corporation’s name including one of the following words: “corporation,” “company,” “incorporated,” “limited,” or an abbreviation thereof.
In what three situations can an ultra vires act be challenged?
An ultra vires act can be challenged in only the following situations:
(1) A shareholder can file suit to enjoin the corporation’s ultra vires action,
(2) The corporation can take action against a director, officer, or employee who engaged in the action, or
(3) The state can initiate a proceeding to enjoin the corporation’s ultra vires action.
What is par-value stock?
Par value is the minimum price for which the stock can be sold by the corporation (need not be its market value).
Note: Par value applies only when the stock is first sold by the corporation (as opposed to a shareholder selling to another).
Who may a director rely on in making decisions?
Reliance Protection: A director may rely on information and opinions of officers, employees, outside experts (e.g., attorneys, accountants), or committees, so long as the director reasonably believes them to be reliable and competent.
What is a shareholder’s preemptive right?
Definition: A preemptive right is the right to buy enough stock to maintain your ownership percentage in the corporation if the corporation sells more stock; a waiver of preemptive rights in writing is irrevocable.
Generally, SHs have only limited liability for corporate acts and are only at risk to the extent of their investment. What is the exception to this rule?
Piercing the corporate veil–if a plaintiff can pierce the corporate veil, then the SHs can be held personally liable.
What is a director’s liability for unlawful distributions to shareholders? If liable, is the director entitled to contributions from other directors or shareholders?
If a director violates the duty of care or loyalty in approving an improper dividend, the director is personally liable for any amount above the lawful distribution amount.
A director is entitled to contributions from other directors who have also violated their duties and from the excess amount received by shareholders who knowingly accepted unlawful distributions.
How can you distinguish between a direct suit by a shareholder and a shareholder derivative suit?
The distinctions between direct suits and derivative suits can be murky, but the basic idea is that an action that principally harms the shareholder is a direct action while an action that harms the corporation as an entity is a derivative action. (For example, an allegation that directors mismanaged the corporation is usually derivative.)
A corporate insider can be forced to return short-swing profits to the corporation through a Section 16(b) action. What 4 elements are necessary for a Section 16(b) cause of action?
The following four elements are necessary for a Section 16(b) cause of action:
1) Only publicly traded corporations that have securities traded on a national securities exchange or have assets of more than $10 million and more than 500 SHs
2) Only corporate insiders (directors, officers, and SHs holding more than 10% of a class of stock) are subject to a Section 16(b) action
3) Short swing profits—a corporate insider both bought and sold C’s stock during any six-month period
4) SEC report of change in stock ownership
When does a corporation engage in an ultra vires act?
A corporation engages in an ultra vires act when it has stated a narrow business purpose in its articles but subsequently engages in activities outside that stated purpose.
What is the general rule for a corporation’s liability for pre-incorporation transactions entered into by a promoter? What is the exception?
The corporation is not liable for contracts entered into by the promoter (because there is no fiduciary relationship between the promoter and corporation before the corporation exists).
However, the corporation is liable if it expressly or impliedly adopts a contract by accepting the benefits of the transaction, or gives an express acceptance of liability for the debt.
While the articles of incorporation must be filed to incorporate, they need not spell out the manner in which the corporation is governed. The bylaws contain any lawful provision for the management of the corporation’s business. If there is a conflict between the articles and bylaws, which of the two controls?
In the event of a conflict between a corporation’s articles of incorporation and its bylaws, the articles of incorporation control.
Other than using the de facto corporation doctrine, how else can someone who acted in good faith avoid personal liability when a company was not in compliance with a state’s incorporation requirements?
Corporation by Estoppel Doctrine: A person who deals with an entity as if it were a corporation is estopped from denying its existence and thereby prevented from seeking the personal liability of the business owner.
There are two types of SH meetings: annual and special. SHs entitled to vote must be given notice of either type of meeting in a timely manner. What is considered to be a timely manner, and how do SHs waive their rights to notice?
Voting SHs must be notified of the time, date, and place in a timely manner no less than 10 days and no more than 60 days before the meeting; SHs may waive notice either in writing or by attending the meeting
Unless the articles provide otherwise, corporations may choose directors by cumulative voting. Rather than having separate votes for each directorial slot, SHs are given a number of votes equal to the number of shares multiplied by the number of positions being voted on. What is the effect of this?
The effect of cumulative voting is to allow minority SHs to elect representatives to the board. (In other words, SHs can stack their votes on one or a small number of candidates if they wish, making it easier for minority shareholders to elect at least one director.)
When is the presumption of good faith afforded by the business judgment rule overcome?
The presumption of good faith afforded by the business judgment rule is overcome if the challenger shows fraud, dereliction of duty, condoning illegal conduct, or a conflict of interest.
If a shareholder wins a derivative suit, who recovers the judgment?
While a SH may have suffered harm directly, in a derivative action, the SH is suing on behalf of the corporation for harm suffered by the corporation. Thus, recovery generally goes to the corporation.
How does a court determine whether to pierce the corporate veil?
Courts are generally reluctant to pierce the corporate veil. A court’s analysis whether to do so is generally very fact intensive, and a court will look at the totality of circumstances (whether the corporation is being used as a façade for a dominant SH’s personal dealings).
Common factors courts use in deciding whether to pierce the corporate veil are:
- Undercapitalization
- Disregard of corporate formalities
- Using corporate assets as SH’s own assets
- Self-dealing with the corporation
- Siphoning of the corporation’s funds
- Using corporate form to avoid statutory requirements
- SH’s domination over the corporation
- Fraudulent dealings with a corporate creditor