Corporate Insolvency I Flashcards
Principal statute dealing with corporate insolvency
the Insolvency Act 1986
Legislation that has amended the IA 1986
- Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015
- Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016
- Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA 2020) - commenced 26 June 2020
Insolvency procedures
- IA 1986 introduced two key insolvency procedures: company voluntary arrangements (CVAs) and administration.
- CIGA 2020 introduced the pre-insolvency moratorium and the restructuring plan aimed at rescuing the company.
Meaning of ‘insolvency’
s 122(1)(f) IA 1986: a company may be wound up ‘if it is unable to pay its debts.’
Four tests of insolvency
1) The Cash Flow Test: An inability to pay debts as they fall due (s 123(1)(e))
2) The Balance Sheet Test: The company’s liabilities are greater than its assets (s 123(2))
3) Failure to comply with a statutory demand for a debt of over £750
4) Failure to satisfy enforcement of a judgment debt (s 123(1)(b)
Directors obligations towards companies in financial difficulty
- Directors must review financial performance of a company and recognise when it is facing financial difficulties e.g.:
- The company has unpaid creditors putting pressure on the company to pay its bills
- The company has an overdraft facility that is fully drawn and the bank is refusing to provide further credit
- The company has loans and other liabilities that exceed the value of its assets
Options for a company facing financial difficulties
(1) Do nothing - the directors risk personal liability under IA 1986 and breach of directors duties under the CA 2006
(2) Apply for a pre-insolvency moratorium - gives the company breathing space
(3) Do a deal - reaching either an informal or formal agreement with the company’s creditors with a view to rescheduling debts
(4) Appoint an administrator - a collective formal insolvency procedure (which considers the interests of all creditors) which aims to rescue the company
(5) Put the company into liquidation - a collective insolvency procedure under which a company’s business is wound up and its assets transferred to creditors and (if there is a surplus of assets over liabilities) to its members.
Corporate Insolvency Procedures
- Informal arrangements (with a pre-insolvency moratorium)
- Formal agreements:
(a) Company Voluntary Arrangement
(b) Restructuring Plan
(c) Scheme of Arrangement
(d) Administration
(e) Liquidation
Informal agreements
- avoids the time and cost of formal insolvency proceedings
- difficulty is getting all the creditors to agree
- if a company needs to persuade a bank to keep lending money, the company or its directors could offer to:
- make additional payments or offer the bank additional security;
- reschedule outstanding debts;
- reduce or hold over employees’ salaries for a set period
- creditors, including banks, could enter into Standstill Agreements where they agree not to take enforcement action for a certain period of time. However, it is anticipated they will decline with the introduction of the pre-insolvency moratorium under CIGA 2020.
Pre-insolvency moratorium
- for struggling companies not yet in a formal insolvency process
- a ‘moratorium’ is a period during which creditors are unable to take action to enforce their debts, any existing court proceedings are stayed and the company may not be wound up.
- the pre-insolvency moratorium lasts for 20 business days but can be extended by the directors for a further 20 business days. Further extensions are possible with the consent of a requisite majority of creditors and/or court order. The maximum period is 1 year subject to a court order to extend further.
- the moratorium automatically comes to an end when the company enters into a formal insolvency procedure
Procedure for obtaining the pre-insolvency moratorium
- Directors of the company must apply to court (s A3 IA 1986) The application must be accompanied by (s A6):
- a statement that the company is, or likely to become, unable to pay its debts as they fall due
- a statement from a licensed insolvency practitioner (usually an accountant) known as a Monitor, stating that:
- the company is an eligible company and
- it is likely that the moratorium will result in the rescue of the company.
- the moratorium comes into force at the time that the documents are filed at the court (s A7(1)(a)
- the monitor has the responsibility to notify the registrar of companies and all the creditors that it has come into force
- the monitor has a supervisory function during the moratorium.
Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA)
- a compromise between the company and its creditors
- defined in s 1(1) IA 1986 as ‘a composition in satisfaction of its debts or a scheme of arrangement of its affairs.’
- the creditors agree to part payment of the debts or a new timetable for repayment.
- the agreement must be reported to court but there is no requirement for the court to approve (s 4(6))
- the CVA is supervised and implemented by an Insolvency Practitioner but the company’s directors remain in post and are involved in the implementation
- CVAs can be used together with administration or liquidation
Setting up a CVA
- the directors draft the written proposals and appoint a nominee (an insolvency practitioner)
- if the company is in liquidation/administration, the administrator/liquidator drafts the proposals.
- the director submits the proposals and a statement of the company’s affairs to the nominee.
- the nominee considers the proposals and within 28 days, must report to the court on whether to call a meeting of the company and creditors s 2(1) and s 2(2)
- nominee must give 14 days notice of the meeting to the creditors. A meeting of the members must take place within 5 days of the creditors’ decision.
- the proposals must be approved by: 75% in value of creditors (excluding secured creditors), and a majority in value of unconnected creditors, a simple majority of members
- nominee reports to court on approval.
- nominee becomes supervisor and implements proposals
Effect of CVA
- binding on all unsecured creditors
- secured or preferential creditors are not bound unless they unanimously consent to the CVA (s 4 IA 1986) - this is a major disadvantage
How are CVAs used?
- frequently used either alone or within administration in order to attempt to reach a compromise with creditors, particularly landlords to agree a reduction in rent; particularly common in retail business
CVA - Advantages
- The directors remain in control of the company
- The company can in theory continue to trade
CVA - Disadvantages
- Cannot bind secured or preferential creditors
- Procedure is complex
- Likely to decline further and be replaced by the Restructuring Plan introduced by CIGA 2020
Scheme of arrangement
- must be sanctioned by the court as well as the majority in number representing 75% in value of members and creditors
- dealt with in Part 26 CA 2006
- must be a genuine and effective arrangement or compromise
Parties that can apply to the court for the sanction of a Scheme under s 896(2) CA 2006
- the company itself
- any creditor of the company
- any member of the company
- if the company is being wound up, the liquidator
- if the company is in administration, the administrator
Advantages of Scheme of arrangement
- binds all dissenting creditors including secured creditors, unlike CVAs (s 899(3) CA 2006)
- widely used in practice
- used where a debtor wants to compromise secured debt (as CVAs can’t do this) and when foreign companies want to compromise debt governed by an English law loan agreement
- may be used for business reorganisations of solvent businesses - there is no need for the company to be insolvent
Disadvantages of a Scheme
- no moratorium
- complex and cumbersome procedure
Restructuring plan
- introduced by CIGA 2020
- purpose is to compromise a company’s creditors and shareholders and restructure its liabilities
- a hybrid of CVAs and Schemes.
- creditors and members must be divided into classes and each class which votes on the Plan must be asked to approve it. The Plan must be approved by at least 75% in value of each class voting
- the court must sanction the Plan and it will then bind all creditors
Who can apply for Restructuring Plan
- the company
- any creditor
- any member
- the liquidator (if the company is in liquidation)
- the administrator (if the company is in administration)
Advantages of a Restructuring Plan
- the court can sanction a plan if it is just and equitable to do so even if one or more classes do not vote to approve the plan
- cross class cramdown: in many cases a higher rank of creditor can force the Plan on a lower class of creditor who voted against the Plan
- cramdown of shareholders: forcing shareholders to accept the Plan, diluting equity, creating debt for equity swaps.
- likely to be used by directors alongside the pre-insolvency moratorium but can also be used by administrators and liquidators
- may be better than a CVA because it can compromise the rights and claims of secured creditors and shareholders