Core Study Aims Flashcards

1
Q

Dement & Kleitman (sleep & dreams)

A

To explore whether there is there a positive correlation between subjective estimates of dream
duration and REM length.

To investigate whether eye movement related to dream content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hassett et al. (monkey toy preference)

A

To test if sex differences in children’s toy preferences result from biological factors, for example, from prenatal hormone exposure rather than through socialization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hassett et al. (monkey toy preference)

A

To investigate if male and female rhesus monkeys have similar toy preferences to human infants, despite no socialization experience with human toys.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hölzel et al. (mindfulness & brain scans)

A

To identify changes in specific brain regions, and changes in the whole brain, by comparing gray matter concentration before and after a mindfulness course.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Andrade (doodling)

A

To investigate whether doodling assists information processing, perhaps by enabling people to attend more effectively or by enhancing their memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Baron-Cohen et al. (eyes test)

A

To test whether a group of adults with Asperger Syndrome (AS) or High-functioning Autism (HFA) would be impaired on the revised version of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Baron-Cohen et al. (eyes test)

A

To test if there was an association between performance on the revised ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ task and measures of autistic traits,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Baron-Cohen et al. (eyes test)

A

To investigate if there were sex differences in those without autism on the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pozzulo et al. (line-ups)

A

To assess whether children’s false positive responding with target-absent lineups is driven by social factors to a greater degree than cognitive factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pozzulo et al. (line-ups)

A

To investigate whether the pattern in correct identification and false positive responding would remain when manipulating the familiarity of the target.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bandura et al. (aggression)

A

To investigate whether a child would learn aggression by observing a model and would reproduce this behavior in the absence of the model, and whether the sex of the role model was important.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fegan et al. (elephant learning)

A

To see whether free contact, traditionally trained elephants can be trained to participate in a trunk wash by using positive reinforcement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Saavedra and Silverman (button phobia)

A

To examine the role of classical conditioning in relation to fear and avoidance of a particular stimulus.

To see if using a type of exposure therapy could reduce the disgust and distress associated with buttons in a specific phobia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Milgram (obedience)

A

To investigate how obedient individuals would be to orders received from a person in authority.

To investigate whether people would be obedient to authority even when it would result in physical harm to another person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Perry et al. (personal space)

A

To test the differential effect of the social hormone Oxytocin on personal space preference in relation to a person’s empathy ability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritanism)

A

To study bystander behavior in a natural setting.

To investigate the effect of four situational variables on helping behavior or ‘Good Samaritanism’.