Core Studies - Developmental Psychology - Lee’s Study Flashcards
Piaget’s Research
Suggested that children do not begin to use the protagonist’s intentions as the key factor of their moral judgements until around 11 years old
Wimmer’s Research
Disagreed with Piaget as preschool children and young school-aged children are distinctly capable of distinguishing lying from behavioural misdeeds and can consistently make moral judgements in a similar way to that of older children and adults when both the falsity of a statement and the speaker’s intention to deceive are highlighted
Sweetser’s Research
Argued that the understanding of lying is greatly influenced by the cultural norms and moral values in which a person in socialised
Purpose of Lee’s Research
Conducted to bridge the gap between this previous research by directly testing the posited effect of culture on children’s moral evaluations of lying and truth telling
Why were Children in People’s Republic of China (PRC) used to compare against the western culture of Canadian Children
Because their cultural values differ and we need a range to better be able to generalise
Examples of cultural differences between Chinese and Canadian children
In China:
- moral education within the curriculum
- collectivist culture
- strict rules that promote promote honesty
- humility is strongly encouraged
Aims
To investigate cross-cultural differences in children’s understanding and moral valuations between Canadian and Chinese children.
Research method
Laboratory experiment using a cross-cultural method
Experimental design
independent measures
Independent variables
Prosocial Behaviour/Truth-telling
Prosocial Behaviour/Lie-telling
Antisocial Behaviour/Truth-telling
Antisocial Behaviour/Lie-telling
What exactly was being manipulated for independent variable
Whether the the participant heard the social story or the physical story
Dependent variables
- The rating given to the story character’s deed on a 7 point scale
- The rating given to what the character said on a 7 point scale
What was the 7 point scale
- very very good
- very good
- good
- neither good nor naughty
- naughty
- very naughty
- very very naughty
Sample
- 120 Chinese children aged 7, 9 and 11
- 108 Canadian children aged 7, 9 and 11
- recruited from elementary and primary schools in medium sized children
Procedure
- Children were randomly allocated into either social or physical story condition
- Each child was seen individually
- The 7 point rating scale was first explained to them
- Each child listened to all four social stories or all four physical stories in 2 sections. First the deed of the character in the story and then the lying/truth telling section
- After each section the children were asked to rate the actions of the characters in the stories using the 7 point scale using phrases such as “Was what she (he) did good or naughty?”