core ideology: conservatism Flashcards
brief summary of conservatism
- the ‘politics of maintenance’
- is highly successful and durable
- responded by adapting to significant social and economic changes over last 200 years
- is a form of change ‘changing to conserve’
- change is inevitable, the aim is to change by drawing on success of the past, an ‘ongoing repair and development’
- prioritise tradition over change, use change as more of a last resort
- won’t advocate for change but aren’t against it
origins
- emerged in response to the politics of the Enlightenment, the french revolution and the ‘terror’ which provided grounds to construct an alternative ideology to liberal values and violence
- makes case for change while avoiding it’s dangers
core ideas: human nature
- unlike liberals and socialists, conservatism focuses on human frailty and fallibility
- we are not perfect, therefore there is no perfect, utopian society
- conservatives see humans as they are, not as they should be
- humans are fixed, cannot be remoulded given the correct society, government should therefore accommodate this imperfection, not try to change reality
key thinker: thomas hobbes (1588-1679)
- said human nature is ruthlessly selfish, calculating and competitive
- without restraint of formal authority, human relations are characterised by ‘envy, hatred and war’
- also believed humans were rational which drives them to agree a contract - putting him to liberalism
- ‘the condition of man.. is a condition of war of everyone against everyone’
- considered conservative and liberal
- argued there was no collaboration between individuals and no natural rights, instead a place of scare resources and ruthless self interest in pursuit of goods
- saw humans as possessing some measure of rationality and would seek order
- for hobbes, principal reason for the existence of the state was to provide order and security from ‘society’ could exist
key thinker: edmund burke (1729-97)
- true father of conservatism
- in critique of enlightenment and french revolution, he rejected view that human nature was guided by reason - hence we are incapable of building a perfect society
- instead he drew on the biblical notion of ‘original sin’ and that it is custom, habit and experience that provides humans with signposts for how to behave
hobbes vs burke
- both shared sceptical view of human nature, however understanding of human imperfection was different
- burke didn’t believe humans were as brutish and selfish as hobbes did and stressed were capable of kindness and wisdom
- burke also argued human nature was naturally communal -
‘a state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation’
key thinker: micheal oakeshott (1901-90)
- said conservatism is more psychology than ideology ‘an instinctive preference for what is known, an innate fear of the uncertain’
- human nature is fragile and fallible, but benign and benevolent when framed by routine
- without law, life would be ‘noisy, foolish and fawned’ not brutish and short
- brought fresh perspective to conservative thinking in 20th century
- a ‘philosophy of imperfection’ need to be a ‘philosophy of pessimism’
- refined hobbe’s negative view of human nature
- argued conservatism was more optimistic than other ideologies
- conservatism has greater appreciation of the pleasures that already exist
- argued the state exists to ‘prevent the bad rather than create the good’
key thinkers: robert nozick (1938-2002) and ayn rand (1905-82)
- highlighted human nature’s desire for individual freedom, capacity for innovation and enterprise
- however agreed with traditional conservatives that humans need periodic restraint of formal authority
- like hobbes argued human nature driven by self interest and hence requires constraint to provide peace and stability
localism
society is a collection of localised communities that restrain selfish individualism
organicism
society emerges organically over time (can’t be planned as humans lack ability to know what future should be)
empiricism
view societal challenges as requiring evidence based, practical solutions (how it is rather than how it should be), a rejection of normative and progressive perspectives on how society should be
tradition
supports empiricism (what works)
customs and habits provide security for individuals and draws on organicism - a society’s present direction stems from past development, change should be slow and respectful of past
hierarchy
human imperfections suggest inequality is inevitable, where ‘the wider, stronger and more opulent’ establish a hierarchy of power and privilege
hierarchy is natural, however this comes with responsibilities for less fortunate
judaeo christian morality
contrasts to rationalism, conservatives prefer original sin and promoting traditional values e.g - marriage and family, individuals are responsible for their actions (not products of some dysfunctions society)
religion binds people together (cohesion) and promotes altruism
property
plays a crucial role in shaping conservative beliefs
private property supports tradition and community, for example inheritance offers stability, private property owners have a ‘stake’ in society and to avoid revolution and risk to property, will favour paternalism