Control of gene expression: transcription Flashcards

1
Q

is the sense strand of dna coding or non-coding

A

non coding - transcribed rna has same sequence as synthesised using the template.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 stages of transcription

A

initiation, elongation, termination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is incorporated and what is generated in transcription

A

NMP incorporated

pyrophosphate generated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

NAD+ cap

A
  • stabilises some prokaryotic mRNAs, can be incorporated by RNAP at +1 A, dep on promoter sequence
  • NAD structure contains adenine diphosphate
  • new mechanism of regulation of prokaryotic gene expression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RNAP core vs holoenzyme

A

holoenzyme - has sigma factor, allows promoter recognition

core enzyme - efficient elongation, multiple start sites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RNAP structure

A

Mg2+ in active site, a cleft between the B and B’ subunits
a CTD can bind DNA
similar to eukaryotic RNAP II, despite there only being high seq identity at the active site

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

identifying promoters - consensus seqs

A

in silico - align multiple seqs with TSS as reference, degree of match with promoter suggests functional strength. see sequence logo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

natural promoter mutations

A

affect mRNA quantity, can be UP or DOWN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

methods for biochemically mapping DNA-protein interactions - KMnO4

A
  • KMnO4 reacts with unpaired thymine bases, alkali treatment then cleaves at the modified positions - so see where DNA becomes unwound.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

methods for biochemically mapping DNA-protein interactions - EMSA

A
electrophophoretic mobility shift assay
- label DNAends with 32P
- incubate with DNA binding protein
- non denaturing gel electrophoresis
- autoradiography
demonstrate sequence specificity with unlabelled competitor DNA titrations - should get decrease in signal complex with WT but not mutant competitor

supershift - test identity of binding protein using an antibody - complex w AB migrates even slower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

methods for biochemically mapping DNA-protein interactions - modification interference

A

at what positions does prior chemical modification prevent protein binding on DNA?

  • 32P label end of 1 DNA strand
  • modify DNA, av 1 per strand
  • incubate w protein
  • separate bound and unbound DNA (eg gel shift)
  • purify DNA, cleave at modified sites
  • missing bands = where modification prevents protein binding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

methods for biochemically mapping DNA-protein interactions - (5)

A
  • DNA footprinting
  • EMSA
  • modification interference
  • KMnO4
  • ChIP
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

structure of bacterial promoter

A
  • -35 box
    • 10 box
  • +1A
  • UP element = AT rich, upstream of -35, recognised by RNAP a subunit CTD - bind via narrowed minor groove, strong promoters
    asymmetry - polarity of transcription
    spacing between - 10 and - 35 important, need correct orientation for RNAP to recognise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sigma subunit domains

A
  • domains 2, 4 - recognise -10 and -35 via HTH
  • 1.1 = -ve DNA mimic, suppresses inappropriate DNA binding. in free aigma, 1.1 int with 4,prevents DNA binding
    in holoenzyme, 1.1 occupies a DNA binding cleft, reducing non-specific binding - displaced upon promoter binding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

events during prokaryotic transcription initiation

A

promoter DNA binding by holoenzyme
closed binary complex
open binary complex (abortive initiation - binding of 1st NTP low affinity, no stacking)
extension beyond 9 NT…
ternary elongation complex - sigma released

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

initiation vs elongation complex

A

initiation - seq specific, has sigma subunit

elongation - sequence non specific, stable so processive