Control issues Flashcards
How can the other threats to internal validity be controlled for in an experimental design?
- Instrumentation effect is also controlled for unless the measurement/test varies significantly
between measures - Regression to the mean is controlled for if the two groups were drawn from the same
sample - Attrition can still be an issue.
Does experimental design have the strongest internal validity?
Yes. It controls for history, maturation, testing effect, and selection bias
What are the two basic experimental designs?
- Between-subject
- Within-subject
What is the between-subject (independent measures) experimental design? And what is a problem associated with it?
- Each person takes part in only one condition of the research
- Problem: creating equivalent groups
- They are the most commonly used design type.
What is the within-subject (repeated measures) experimental design? And what is the problem with it?
- Each person takes part in all conditions of the research
- Problem: participating in one condition might affect behaviour in another condition (sequencing effects)
When do we use between-subject designs?
- Use when the IV is a subject variable (e.g. extrovert/introvert; marital status)
- Used when experience gained in one level would make it impossible to participate in another level
What are two ways to tro have equivalent group in between-subject desgins?
- Random assignment
- Matching
What is random assignment?
- The goal is take individuals factors that could bias the study and spread them evenly throughout different groups
- randomness isn’t guaranteed
- works best with large numbers)
- Random assignment+large sample controls for selection bias, as well as:
- Maturation (controlled for because both groups mature at same rate)
- Instrumentation
- Attrition can unbalance groups (this can only be countered statistically)
What is matching?
- NB: this is not an experimental design
- Use only when you have a small number of participants available, and/or can’t use random assignment.
- Choose a matching variable that correlates with the DV (i.e. is expected to affect the outcome in some way)
- Make sure there is some reasonable way of measuring participants on the matching variable.
- Decidedly not random.
What are the advantages of within-subject designs?
- Needs fewer people
- No problem with equivalent groups
- Reduces error variance, since you have no between-condition individual difference- so it gives more statistical power to find an effect if there is one.
What are the problem with within-subjects design?
- Mainly sequence or order:
- Practice effects
- Fatigue effects
- Carryover effects (does it matter if condition A come before condition B)
What is counter-balancing?
It solves the carryover effects.
- Ensure that half the participants do condition A first, and the other half do condition B first.
How do you minimise practice effects in within-subject designs?
o randomizing or counterbalancing of the order in which participants take part in conditions
o randomizing the order that stimuli are presented over the course of an experimental session
o minimizing the overall effects of practice by allowing participants ‘practice trials’ that serve to get them performing at a desired level before testing takes place
What are mixed designs?
- Sometimes you have both between and within- group measurements.
- Avoids most threats to internal validity if don’t properly
- Control groups are critically important
o Having a repeat measure without a control group can result in internal validity errors, particularly the placebo effect.