contracts themis Flashcards
Define the parol evidence rule.
The parol evidence rule generally prevents a party to a written contract from presenting extrinsic evidence of a prior or contemporaneous agreement that contradicts the terms of the contract as written.
[UCC Firm Offer Rule] Under the UCC, what three requirements must be met for an offer to buy or sell goods to be an irrevocable firm offer?
(i) The offeror is a merchant;
(ii) There is an assurance that the offer is to remain open; and
(iii) The assurance is contained in a signed writing from the offeror.
How is a unilateral offer accepted?
Acceptance of an offer for a unilateral contract requires complete performance.
Note: Once performance has begun, the unilateral offer is irrevocable for a reasonable period of time to allow for complete performance unless there is a manifestation of a contrary intent.
If a destination contract authorizes the seller to ship the goods by carrier, when does the risk of loss shift from the seller to the buyer?
Once the goods are delivered to a particular place (specified in the contract)
What are four forms of consideration?
Consideration can take the form of:
- A return promise to do something
- A return promise to refrain from doing something legally permitted
- The actual performance of some act
- Refraining from doing some act
If a shipment contract authorizes the seller to ship the goods by carrier, when does the risk of loss shift from the seller to the buyer?
Once the goods are delivered to the carrier
When may a nonbreaching party pursue specific performance as a remedy?
When damages are an inadequate remedy, the nonbreaching party can pursue specific performance.
Note: Legal remedies are often inadequate in contracts for land or other unique goods.
Under the UCC, what essential term(s) are required for a contract to be formed?
Quantity
Note: The UCC “fills the gap” if other terms are missing.
Define accord and satisfaction.
Under an accord agreement, a party to a contract agrees to accept a performance from the other party that differs from the performance that was promised in the existing contract, in satisfaction of the other party’s existing duty.
A “satisfaction” is the performance of the accord agreement; it will discharge both the original contract and the accord contract.
When is the implied warranty of merchantability implied, and how is it disclaimed?
The implied warranty of merchantability is implied whenever the seller is a merchant.
The disclaimer can be oral, but must use the term “merchantability” and must be conspicuous if in writing. Language that indicates there is no implied warranty is sufficient (e.g., “as is” or “with all faults”).
What doctrine comes into play when an unexpected event arises that destroys one party’s purpose in entering into the contract, but performance of the contract is not rendered impossible?
The doctrine of frustration of purpose.
The frustrated party is entitled to rescind the contract without paying damages.
Note: The event that arises must not be the fault of the frustrated party, and its nonoccurrence must have been a basic assumption of the contract.
What is the basic concept of legal detriment?
There must be something of substance, either an act or a promise, which is given in exchange for the promise that is to be enforced.
Name the types of contracts that fall within the Statute of Frauds.
Marriage - a contract made upon the consideration of marriage;
Suretyship - a contract to answer for the debt or duty of another;
One year - a contract that cannot be performed within one year from its making;
UCC - under the UCC, a contract for the sale of goods for a price of $500 or more; and
Real Property contract - a contract for the sale of an interest in real property.
What requirements must be met to allow an adversely affected party to void a contract based on mutual mistake?
(i) Mistake of fact existing at the time the contract was formed;
(ii) The mistake relates to a basic assumption of the contract;
(iii) The mistake has a material impact on the transaction; and
(iv) The adversely affected party did not assume the risk of the mistake.
What is the main difference between contract modification under the common law and contract modification under the UCC?
At common law, modifications require consideration; under the UCC, they require only good faith.