Community Property Flashcards
Quasi-Community Property
is property acquired
while living in a non-CP state that would be considered CP
if the spouse(s) had been living in California when the
property was acquired
During marriage QCP is…
SP in nature
Meaning it can be transferred
and will be governed by the laws of the other state
How/when does QCP change
When: at divorce or death OF TITLED SPOUSE
At divorce, QCP is treated as CP.
At death, the surviving spouse has 1/2 interest in QCP titled in decedent’s name (if titled dies–> 1/2 to
if titled spouse lives—> keeps all of it.
Inherits decedents ½ of the CP and ½ of the quasi-CP
Survivor already owned ½ of CP and QCP; thus, gets 100% of CP, and 100% of the QCP as well
Married Woman’s Special Presumption
The married woman’s special presumption gives the wife a
presumption of SP if: (1) title is taken in her name alone;
AND (2) the property was acquired before 1975.
CP ends
death, divorce, perm separation
perm separation
After 2017,
a) one spouse expresses intent to end Marital community
and
B) acts in manner consistent with that intent
Putative Spouse
A putative spouse is one that has a good faith reasonable
belief that he/she is married but is not
h/t
“all property that would have been CP or QCP had the marriage been valid is QMP. QMP is treated as QCP or CP
h/t”
The right to QMP ends once the person
learns he/she is not lawfully married, BUT the person retains
rights to previous QMP acquired while the person had the
good faith belief.
Will share 1/2 community property with legal spouse
Unmarried Cohabitants
K principles govern property distribution acquired
- an express K will be enforced unless the underlying consideration for the K is sexual services
if no express K a court examines the partie’s acts to determine whether they had an implied K
- quantum meruit principles of unjust enrichment apply.
Tracing
to rebut a presumption regarding an asset, a party can trace the SOURCE of the funds used to acquire the asset to claim a different classification of the asset
why: a change in the form of an asset does not change teh characterization of an asset***
common law marriages
abolished in CA, under full faith and credit, CA will recognize a common law marriage made in another jurisdiction
avoiding community property law
heading: K-ing out of CP law
can do so via
-premarital agreement
-transmutation
can alter
- property rights
- ownership rights
- spousal support
can’t alter:
- child support
- nor promote divorce
Requirements for a valid prenup since Jan 1, 1986
- in writing
- signed by both parties
(s. o.f) - must be enforceable without consideration
even tho s.o.f. verbal agreements will be enforced through promissory estoppel or detrimental reliance
Defenses to prenups and transmutations
all K defenses
- involuntary
- unconscionable
- some spousal support provision stuff (another card
spousal support provisions
are not enforceable if:
the party against whom enforcement is sought was not represented by indep counsel at time of signing
or
at time of enforcement the provision is unconscionable
unconscionable prenups v unconscionable spousal support provision
if pre-nup–> unconscionability analyzed at time of execution
if spousal support provision –> unconsc at time of enforcement
involuntary
to be voluntary (bop on proponent)
ALL of following:
- adversary spouse was represented by indep counsel OR waived in writing (separate writing)
- if no counsel then were fully informed of terms and basic effects
can’t be a product of duresss, fraud, undue influence, or incapacity
any other relevant facts
unconscionable
ALL of the following:
- spouse lacked full fair and rsble disclosure of property and obligations of other spouse
- spouse didn’t waive the disclosure in writing
- spouse didn’t have nor reasonably could have had adequate knowledge of the other spouse’s property or obligations
TRANSMUTATIONS**
as of 1985:
- in writing
- contain an express declaration by the adversly affected spouse that teh characterization or ownership of asset is being changed
exceptions:
- gifts
before 1985
oral (express and implied) and written
transmutations were valid.
general presumptions
regard the when
rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence
special presumptions
regard the how
rebutted by clear and convincing evidence of contrary intent