Contracts MBE Flashcards
Formation
1) Offer 2) Acceptance 3) Consideration
Offer
Outward manifestation of intent to enter into a contract, Intent AND Specific terms
Ads
Not an Offer, “Invitation to an Offer”
Termination of an Offer
Death, Lapse of Time, Rejection, Counteroffer, Revocation
Direct Revocation
Retraction of an Offer by the offeror
Indirect Revocation
Person receiving Offer LEARNS another deal was made
Revocable
Offers are revocable, only 3 instances when it is not
Option Contract
1) Promise of keep offer open 2) additional consideration
UCC Firm Offer
1) Merchants 2) signed by Merchant Can only stay open for 3 months
Unilateral
promise for an act
Common Law Mirror Image Rule
Acceptance must mirror the Offer
How to Accept an Offer
Silence • Performance • Mail
Common Law Mailbox Rule
Acceptance is effective when SENT
Mailbox Exception
• If a Rejection is sent first, then an Acceptance is sent, whichever arrives first wins
UCC Acceptance
Acceptance is construed liberally Exceptions • Material change the terms of contract • Objection to the change of a term in a reasonable amount of time • Offer limits the Acceptance
Consideration
Bargained-for Exchange You will never have insufficient consideration because of the amount, even a peppercorn is enough
Illusory Promise
Party making the Offer retains control
Gifts
Promise to give a gift is NOT valid Consideration
Past or Moral Consideration
Is NOT valid Consideration
Promise to pay debt barred by Statute of Limitations
Is valid Consideration
Promise to pay debt discharged by bankruptcy
Is valid Consideration
Forbearance to sue
Promise not to sue • Is valid Consideration
Promissory Estoppel
Detrimental Reliance
Accord & Satisfaction
Must have been disputed
Age
A contract with a minor is VOIDABLE at option of minor
Mental Illness
VOID
Duress
Wrongful threat VOID
Undue influence
Uneven bargaining position
Unconscionability
Result itself will be unfair
Illegal
Unenforceable
Unilateral Mistake
One party is mistaken Generally, not a defense unless: 1) Other party knew of mistake 2) Clerical error
Mutual Mistake
Both parties mistaken about material term • Remedy: Rescission
Intentional Misrepresentation
Knew/should have known of falsity with intent to induce reliance
Negligent Misrepresentation
Causes the innocent party to detrimentally rely
Non-Compete Clauses
Reasonable under the circumstances To determine if a non-compete clause is reasonable, look for facts that indicate how long you can’t compete and the geographic area restrictions
Statute of Frauds
Certain contracts must be in writing Remember MYLEGS - Marriage, Contract cannot be performed in one Year, Land, Executor, Guarantor/Surety, Sale of goods of $500 or more
Part Performance Exception
A showing of 2 out of 3: 1) Some payment, 2) Possession of land , 3) valuable improvements
Guarantor/Surety Exception
1) Look to main purpose/motive 2) If self-serving, contract does NOT need to be in writing
Sale of goods of $500 Exception
1) Partial Performance will take contract out of SOF ͉ 2) Merchant Confirmation: • Confirmation signed by sender • Includes the quantity • No written objection within 10 days
Legal Writing
1) Parties 2) Subject matter 3) Material terms 4) Signed by party to be charged
Final/Complete Integration
Parol Evidence is NOT admissible
Merger Clause
Final agreement between the parties Parol Evidence is NOT admissible
Exception to Final/Complete Integration
• Terms added to clear up an ambiguity
Partial Integration
Parol Evidence IS admissible
Parol Evidence IS admissible to show
Fraud • Mistake • Duress • Condition precedent • Course of dealing • Trade custom
Non-Carrier Case Seller is a merchant
risk on seller until buyer takes possession
Seller is a nonmerchant
risk on seller until goods are tendered to buyer
Shipment Contract
Risk of loss shifts to buyer when goods delivered to CARRIER
Destination Contract
Risk of loss shifts to buyer when goods delivered to DESTINATION
FOB SELLER
is a Shipment Contract
FOB “ANYTHING ELSE”
is a Destination Contract
Requirements Contract
Buy all the widgets • Key word: good faith
Common Law Modification
New consideration is needed
UCC Modification
No new consideration, good faith needed Clauses prohibiting oral modifications are valid
Mutual Modification
1) Both parties agree to modify the original terms 2) “Fair and reasonable under circumstances”
Condition Precedent
event happens prior to performance of K
Condition Concurrent
event occurs at time of performance of K
Condition Subsequent
event occurs after the K
Conditions Excused
• Waiver • Bad faith • Avoiding forfeiture
Time is of the Essence
Time is NOT of the Essence unless stated
Non-Conforming Goods Buyer’s Rights
May reject May accept May reject in part & accept in part
Seller’s Right to Cure
1) Seller had reasonable grounds to believe the goods would be acceptable 2) By notice + new tender within time for performance
Installment Contract
Delivering goods in several different shipments
Non-Conforming Installment Contract
Defective shipment cannot be rejected if the defect can be cured
Impracticability
Unforeseen event makes performance too difficult/expensive
Impossibility
No one can perform
Frustration of Purpose
The core reason for K is no longer present
Anticipatory Repudiation
1) Before contract performance 2) One party UNEQUIVOCALLY refuses to perform
Demand Assurances
Demand when doubtful about performance Party must respond in a reasonable amount of time
UCC Assurances
Demand must be in writing
Retraction of Repudiation
Party can retract unless • The other party has sued • The other party has accepted the repudiation • The other party has relied on the repudiation
Legal Remedy
Money damages
Expectation Damages
Put plaintiff in position if K had been performed “Foreseeable with reasonable certainty” Formula - Expectation Damages: (K price) - (Money received/saved) + (Costs)
Reliance Damages
Put plaintiff in position he would have been prior to K
Restitution
Getting back any value you already gave Contract PARTIALLY performed Measured by market value of the services
Consequential Damages
Foreseeable costs because of breach
Liquidated Damages
Determined at time of contract Enforced if reasonable Not a penalty
Unjust enrichment
The Breaching Party can recover: (Reasonable value of services) - (Damages incurred)
UCC Seller Damages
If Buyer breaches, Seller can recover: Goods Delivered & Accepted = (K price) Some/None goods Delivered = (K price) - (Market price) Goods Resold = (K price) - (Resale price) Additionally, Incidental Damages
Lost Volume Seller
Seller can sell as many widgets as possible
Lost Profits
(Expected profit) + (Costs) - (Payment for resale)
UCC Buyer Damages
If the Seller breaches, Buyer can recover: Purchased replacement goods = (K price) - (Cost of new goods) NO replacement goods = (K price) - (Market price at time of breach) (Incidental/Consequential Damages) - (Expenses saved)
Equitable Remedies
Recoverable when remedy at law is inadequate
Specific Performance
Court will make a party perform For UNIQUE items Land is always unique
Injunction
To “prevent irreparable harm”
Rescission
No meeting of the minds • Mistake • Misrepresentation • Duress • Lack of capacity
Third Party Beneficiary
Two people have a valid K Third party will benefit from K
Incidental Beneficiary
Third party who incidentally benefits from K NEVER has rights under K
Intended Beneficiary
Original parties intend to benefit a third party MAY have rights under K
3rd party Rights VEST When
1) Third party is informed of rights & accepts OR 2) Third party learns of rights & relies
If Rights Have Vested
Third party has same rights & defenses as original parties
Assignment & Delegation
Two people have a valid K One party transfers obligation to someone else • Assignments & Delegations are VALID require “present intent to transfer”
Novation
A release of the original party from the K
Anti-Assignment Clause
1) The Assignment is still VALID, but 2) The original party liable for money damages
Anti-Assignment Exceptions
1) Not valid if it would MATERIALLY ALTER RISK of performance 2) Unique or Personal Service K cannot be transferred