Contracts (Kaplan) Flashcards
1
Q
Are reward offers considered real offers?
A
Yes, b/c they are communications that promise $ in exchange for performance of specific tasks.
2
Q
Are commercial ads considered offers?
A
Under the American rule, ads, catalogs, price lists are INVITATIONS FOR OFFERS, since responses may exceed available supply of good/services.
3
Q
Elements of an Offer
A
(1) Outward Manifestation (oral, written or via conduct); and
(2) Signal that ACCEPTANCE WILL CONCLUDE THE DEAL (power of acceptance).
4
Q
Four Ways to Terminate the Power of Acceptance
A
1) Lapse of Time
2) Death / incapacity of either party
3) Revocation by offeror
4) Rejection by the offeree
5
Q
Terminating the Power of Acceptance: Lapse of Time
A
This occurs
1) after time stated in offer expires; OR
2) after a REASONABLE TIME.
–Reasonable time is determined by (A) subject matter/market conditions; and (B) the degree of urgency and means of transmission.
6
Q
Revocation of Offer by Offeror
A
Offeror may revoke at any time, for any reason
HOWEVER, the offer must be revoked BEFORE acceptance and THE revocation must be COMMUNICATED.
(can be done directly or indirectly)
7
Q
What are the requirements for Indirect Revocation of an Offer?
A
1) Offeror takes action that is INCONSISTENT w/ the intent to go through w/ offer; and
2) Offeree LEARNS of such action from a RELIABLE SOURCE.
8
Q
If an offeror gives an offeree a specific amount of time to accept, can the offeror revoke this offer?
A
Yes, the offeror can revoke even if he gave a specific time to accept (absent consideration to keep offer open).
–HOWEVER, note that courts will consider offers open when the offeree has DETRIMENTALLY RELIED on them, such as when general contractors rely on subcontractor’s bids in forming their own bids on a project.
9
Q
What are the elements of an Option Contract?
A
1) Offer;
2) Separate promise to keep the offer open; and
3) A valid mechanism for enforcing the subsidiary promise (consideration is most common way).
10
Q
Firm Offer under UCC
A
Irrevocable offer by merchant to buy/sell goods WITHOUT consideration.
Requirements:
1) Offer made BY A MERCHANT;
2) In a writing signed BY THE MERCHANT OFFEROR;
3) Expressly stating that it will be held open.
–Irrevocable for time stated or reasonable time, BUT NO LONGER THAN 3 MONTHS EVEN IF STATED OTHERWISE.
11
Q
Termination. by Offeree’s Rejection
A
1) Outright rejection;
2) Rejection via counteroffer (counteroffer = rejection + new offer)
–EXCEPTION: Offeree can test the waters by making a MERE INQUIRY.
3) Rejection via non-conforming acceptance.
–MIRROR IMAGE RULE: Acceptance must mirror the terms, and any variation is a counteroffer (and rejection of the initial offer).
12
Q
Counteroffer
A
A counteroffer = rejection + new offer.
13
Q
Mirror Image Rule
A
Under common law, acceptance must mirror the terms, and any variation is a counteroffer (and rejection of the initial offer).
14
Q
What is a bilateral contract?
A
Offer seeking acceptance by a promise.
A promise for a promise is being exchanged. Once promises are exchanged, both parties are bound.
15
Q
What is a unilateral contract?
A
Offer seeking performance in return (I.e., reward offers).
Offeror not bound until offeree completes performance, and offeree is NEVER bound.
16
Q
Revocation of Offer - Unilateral Contract
A
Once offeree BEGINS PERFORMANCE, an option K is created and offeror may NOT REVOKE.
MERE PREPARATIONS DO NOT CREATE AN OPTION K, ONLY BEGINNING PERFORMANCE.
17
Q
What are the terms of acceptance under common law?
A
Acceptance must MIRROR the terms of the offer and be COMMUNICATED TO THE OFFEROR.
Two exceptions:
1) Unilateral Ks
2) Acceptance by Mail
18
Q
Acceptance: Unilateral Ks
A
Acceptance is only effective by completing performance, no communication is required unless offer provides otherwise.
19
Q
Acceptance by Mail
A
Acceptance by mail is effective UPON DISPATCH if properly posted.
–Applies only to acceptances and not to any other communication (I.e., not revocations or rejections)
–Default Rule: It applies UNLESS the offer provides otherwise.
20
Q
The Mailbox Rule and Option Ks
A
Restatement/Maj. Rule: FOR OPTION CONTRACTS, the mailbox rule is NOT applicable and acceptance is only effective UPON RECEIPT.
21
Q
What happens when an offeree dispatches 2 responses to an offer, the 1st purporting to reject the offer and the 2nd purporting to accept it?
A
Mailbox rule does NOT govern if rejection is mailed before acceptance, and whichever arrives first will be effective.
22
Q
UCC - Acceptance by Seller’s Shipment of Nonconforming Goods
A
Seller can accept Buyer’s offer to purchase goods for prompt or current shipment in 3 ways:
1) Promise to ship the goods;
2) Shipping conforming goods; or
3) Shipping non-conforming goods, UNLESS the seller sends the shipment as an ACCOMMODATION. (I.e., counteroffer)
–Accommodation = counteroffer
23
Q
UCC Rejection of the Mirror Image Rule
A
An offeree’s nonconforming acceptance or confirmation (w/ additional terms) will operate as an effective acceptance, thus forming a contract (NOT a counteroffer).
24
Q
UCC Battle of Forms: Effect of Additional or Different Terms
A
BETWEEN MERCHANTS, the “ADDITIONAL” terms in offeree’s acceptance or confirmation become PART OF THE K, EXCEPT in 3 circumstances:
1) The offer expressly limits acceptance to its own terms;
2) If offeror objects to the additional terms within a reasonable time;
3) If the additional terms would materially alter the K.
–“Material alteration” = terms that would result in “surprise or hardship if incorporated w/o the express awareness of the other party. (e.g., warranty disclaimers, clauses that materially shorten the deadline for raising complaints, clauses that change usages of trade or past courses of dealing.
–Note: “Different” terms in the two writings dealing w/ the same topic will KNOCK EACH OTHER OUT.
25
UCC Battle of Forms: What are considered "material alterations" of the K?
"Material alteration" = terms that would result in "surprise or hardship if incorporated w/o the express awareness of the other party.
For example:
1) warranty disclaimers;
2) clauses that materially shorten the deadline for raising complaints;
3) clauses that change usages of trade or past courses of dealing.
26
What is the Knockout Rule?
"Different" terms in the two writings dealing w/ the same topic will KNOCK EACH OTHER OUT.
27
Conditional Acceptance
If the offeree's acceptance is specifically conditioned on offeror first agreeing to the additional terms in the acceptance before offeree will proceed, this nonconforming, conditional acceptance will NOT be effective to form a K (I.e., it's a counteroffer)
--No K is formed by the writings until the offeror EXPRESSLY ASSENTS to the additional terms.
28
Contracts Formed by Conduct
The UCC provides that parties' conduct in recognizing the existence of a K is sufficient to establish a K even though their writings do not otherwise establish a K.
The terms of the K will be:
1) terms on which the writings of the parties agree; and
2) default terms provided by the UCC.
--Note: Express terms in the parties' communications which do not match or agree are omitted.
29
Bargain Theory
Promise is supported by consideration if based on a BARGAINED FOR EXCHANGE.
--There was something (goods or services) that was promised, and the promise must have been made in order to obtain something else of value. (quid pro quo)
30
Benefit/Detriment Test
Test to determine whether there is a benefit to the promisor and/or detriment to the promisee.
Look to see whether promisee is:
1) doing something he had a legal right NOT to do; or
--NOTE: WATCH OUT FOR PRE-EXISTING DUTIES (e.g., already have legally duty not to do something illegal)
2) forgoing some activity he HAD a legal right to do.
31
Illusory Promises
Promises of performance that leaves performance to the UNLIMITED DISCRETION of the promising party do NOT constitute consideration.
32
Gratuitous Promises
Promises to make a gift are generally unenforceable due to insufficient consideration.
--Exception: Gratuitous transfer are legally binding. (once you actually give the item there's no revoking it)
33
Past or Moral Consideration
A promise in exchange for something already given or performed is NOT supported by consideration.
--Exceptions:
1) A WRITTEN promise to pay a debt barred by limitations. (e.g., look for waiver of statute of limitations)
2) A WRITTEN promise to pay a debt discharged by bankruptcy.
34
Promissory Estoppel
Promisee that reasonably relies to his detriment on gratuitous promise may be able to enforce that promise even w/o consideration.
4 Requirements:
1) A promise;
2) Foreseeable reliance;
3) Actual reliance (must be induced by the parties);
4) Injustice w/o enforcement.
35
Statute of Frauds (Categories)
6 categories governed by the SOF = MYLEGS
M - MARRIAGE
Y - YEAR (LESS THAN 1)
L - LAND
E - EXECUTOR (or administrator to answer for a duty of a decedent)
G - GUARANTEE (or suretyship)
S - SALE OF GOODS ($500 or more)
36
Florida Rules: Statute of Frauds
1) FL states that leases of real property for less than 1 year are NOT subject to SOF.
2) Subscriptions for newspapers, periodicals, etc. must be in writing to be enforceable.
3) A writing is required to charge any health care provider upon any guarantee, warranty or assurance as to the results of any medical procedure (including physicians, dentists, etc)
4) Home solicitation sales must be evidenced by a writing. (must have certain buyer's right to cancel language included and buyer must sign and date)
5) Home-improvement Ks (includes all labor, materials, services to be furnished when all or part of K is paid in installment over a period of time greater than 90 days)
6) Credit Agreements.
37
Contracts Not to be Performed within a Year
Measured from date of K made, NOT date performance begins.
ASK: At point of formation, is it all possible (even if not probable) to complete required performance within 1 year?
FREQUENTLY TESTED SITUATIONS:
1) K that can be breached or excused within a year of formation
--Irrelevant. This is potentially true of any K and so would swallow the 1 year rule.
--What matters is not whether the K can breached within 1 year, but rather can the K be performed in full by its terms within 1 year of its formation.
2) A lifetime or permanent K of employment is NOT governed by the 1-year rule b/c employee's death is possible within 1 year.
38
Guaranty / Suretyship Agreements
Although guaranty Ks (secondary obligation) are generally within SOF, a primary exception is the MAIN PURPOSE DOCTRINE.
That is, where the main purpose of the guarantor is to protect his own economic interests, then the guaranty is NOT governed by SOF and can be oral.
39
Writing Requirement for SOF
All that is necessary is that the writing be a memorandum of the agreement which can be prepared before, during, or after formation.
Following terms are required:
1) Identity of the parties to the transaction;
2) The nature and subject matter of K;
3) The essential terms of the agreement, such as price and date of performance.
40
SOF: Part Performance
Statute of frauds may be satisfied w/ respect to some categories of governed Ks via part performance, in an action for specific performance.
1) Land Sale Ks (requires any combo of the 3)
--(a) payment of all or part of purchase price;
--(b) taking possession of land;
--(c) making substantial improvements to property.
2) 1-Yr Ks
--If fully performed = enforceable despite SOF
--If partially performed = unenforceable
41
UCC Statute of Frauds
Ks for sale of goods worth $500+ are under UCC SOF.
5 ways to satisfy:
1) Signed Writing (must state quantity + be signed by party against whom enforcement is sought)
2) Merchant's Confirmation
3) Judicial Admission (party admits K formation in a pleading, testimony, etc.)
4) Partial performance
5) Specially manufactured goods
42
What is a Merchant's Confirmation?
This is an exception to UCC SOF.
2 merchants enter oral agreement, one sends the other written confirmation of agreement.
SOF satisfied against the recipient merchant if:
1) Both sender and recipient are MERCHANTS;
2) Writing is in confirmation of the K and contains a QUANTITY; and
3) Recipient does NOT send written objection within 10 days.
43
UCC SOF: Partial Performance
Despite absence of a writing, an otherwise valid K is enforceable for:
1) goods for which payment made/accepted; or
2) goods which have been received/accepted.
44
UCC SOF: Specially Manufactured Goods
SOF satisfied against buyer who orders CUSTOM GOODS from a manufacturer if:
1) manufacturer detrimentally relied by beginning performance before buyer's withdrawal; and
2) manufacturer can't resell the goods in the ordinary course of business.
45
UCC Default Provisions
Used to fill in the gaps when K doesn't address the matter, but parties are free to set default rules aside by contracting otherwise.
46
Implied Warranties
1) Warranty of Title
2) Warranty of Merchantability
3) Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
47
Warranty of Title
For the sale of all goods, there in an implied warranty of:
1) good title to the goods;
2) rightful transfer of the goods; and
3) no liens or security interests are attached to the goods.
48
Warranty of Merchantability
Goods fit for ORDINARY PURPOSES for which those goods would be used.
ONLY applies if seller is a merchant.
Displaced by:
1) specific use of the word "merchantability" and conspicuousness if in writing; or
2) any other language or circumstances that would reasonably be understood by a buyer to exclude the warranty ("as is" or patent defects).
49
Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
Goods being sold are fit for the PARTICULAR PURPOSE buyer intends to use them for.
ONLY applies when, at time of contracting, seller has reason to know:
1) the particular purpose for which the goods are required; and
2) the buyer is relying on seller's expertise to select reasonable goods.
--Warranty negated when: (1) disclaimer is written, clear, and conspicuous; or (2) goods have patent defects which were easily detectible.
50
Missing Terms (under the UCC)
Under the UCC, where there are pertinent missing terms, the following default rules will fill in those missing terms:
1) Price term = reasonable price at time established by the K for delivery.
2) Time term = reasonable time
3) Place of delivery term = seller's place of business (I.e., FOB Seller)
51
Missing Terms (under the Common Law)
If one party performs services at the request of another, but no price is discussed in advance, then the CL default rule applies = reasonable value for services rendered.
52
UCC / CL Obligation of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
Another source of gap-filling = obligation of good faith and fair dealing in the performance and enforcement of Ks
--Good faith = honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade
--Good faith obligation where terms of K leave critical term, such as price, satisfaction, or quantity open to the determination of one party.
53
Open Price Terms
If K leaves price to be fixed by one of the parties, then that party must fix the price in good faith.
54
Satisfaction Terms
If K contains a satisfaction clause or similar term, then the determination as to whether a party's performance obligation must be satisfied in good faith.
55
Open Quantity Terms Ks
1) Output Ks: Buyer agrees to purchase all or a percentage of seller's output for a particular good
2) Requirements K: Seller agrees to supply the buyer w/ all or a % of buyer's requirements for a particular good.
--Under UCC, the party entitled to determine the particular quantity of goods to be sold (either the buyer demanding delivery of his requirements or the seller demanding purchase of her output) must make that determination in good faith.
--UCC also prohibits any unreasonably disproportionate demand or tender, if there was either:
(a) a stated estimate; or
(b) a past course of dealing.
56
Trade Usage, Course of Dealing, Course of Performance
Extrinsic evidence that can be used to fill gaps and resolve ambiguities in Ks.
1) Usage of Trade - what all members of the trade do
2) Course of Dealing - what parties did in their PREVIOUS contracts
3) Course of Performance - how the parties acted under their CURRENT performance. (occurs if K involves repeated occasions for performance by a party)
--NOTE: These may NOT be used to contradict express terms of K.
--In conflict, course of performance prevails over course of dealing and usage of trade, and course of dealing prevails over usage of trade.
57
Parol Evidence Rule
The parol evidence rule precludes the admissibility of extrinsic “verbal agreements [evidence] between the parties to a written contract which are made BEFORE or AT THE TIME of execution of the contract.”
In FL, Parol Evidence is inadmissible to contradict, vary, or modify terms which are unambiguously contained within a written agreement.
58
Partial Integration
Partial integration is when the contract contains only some of the terms agreed upon by both parties. In contract disputes, parol evidence is admissible to clear up ambiguities on agreement terms that are not fully integrated.
59
Purposes for Which Parol Evidence is Introduced
Purpose #1- To explain or interpret terms of written K
--Parol evidence is ALWAYS admissible for this
Purpose #2 - To supplement terms of written K
--Parol evidence is admissible for this UNLESS K is completely integrated (I.e., has a merger clause)
--UCC Distinction: trade usage, course of dealing, and course of performance can supplement a completely integrated agreement
Purpose #3 - To contradict terms of written K
--Parol evidence is NOT admissible for this purpose (if K is fully integrated)
--UCC Distinction: course of dealing, and course of performance may be admissible in sale of goods cases to "qualify" the meaning of an integrated term
60
When Parole Evidence Rule Will Not Apply
3 circumstances:
1) Subsequent agreements
2) Collateral agreements (PE rule will not affect agreements between parties that are entirely distinct from the written agreement of the K at issue)
3) Attacking the validity of the written K (PE rule ONLY applies if there's a valid agreement to begin with)
61
Reformation
This is attacks the validity of a written agreement.
For P to obtain reformation, it must be shown that:
1) There was an antecedent valid agreement;
2) That this antecedent agreement is incorrectly reflected in the writing b/c of mistake or fraud; and
3) That proof is established by clear/convincing evidence.
62
Non-Carrier Cases: Who bears the risk of loss?
If seller is NOT a merchant: as soon as goods are made available to him (tendered)
If seller IS a merchant: once goods are physically in buyer's possession
63
Shipment Contract
ROL passes to buyer when goods are DELIVERED TO THE CARRIER.
--Identified as "FOB Seller" or K is silent (default rule).
--Buyer bears ROL if goods are damaged in transit.
64
Destination Contract
ROL passes to buyer when goods are TENDERED AT THE DESTINATION point specified in the K.
--Identified as "FOB Buyer"
--Seller bears ROL if goods are damaged in transit
65
Modification: Preexisting Duty Rule
A promise to increase compensation for duties ALREADY OWED is unenforceable b/c there is no consideration for the modification.
--NOTE: However, be aware that in FL, a slight change in the terms of the contract will suffice as consideration to support modification.
--Also, FL will find consideration for a preexisting duty if it's for the benefit of a new intended third beneficiary.
66
Preexisting Duty Rule: Unforeseen Circumstances
Preexisting duty rule not applicable if increased compensation is given in exchange for a promised performance that has been rendered substantially more burdensome than reasonably anticipated when K formed.
67
UCC: Modification
An agreement modifying an existing K needs NO CONSIDERATION to be enforceable as long as made in GOOD FAITH.
68
Unilateral Mistake
1 party's mistake about present material facts is NOT excused UNLESS the other party knew / had reason to know of the party's mistake.
69
Mutual Mistake
Voidable by disadvantaged party when all 3 met:
1) Mistaken assumption relates to material facts (not just value);
2) Mistake made by both parties; and
3) Disadvantaged party did not bear risk of mistake under the K.
70
Impracticability
FL will determine a contract to be impracticable when circumstances have made performance VITALLY DIFFERENT from what was anticipated when the parties entered the K.
71
Frustration of Purpose
Where a contingency occurs that DRAMATICALLY REDUCES the value of performance to the receiving party.
Test (3 Elements):
1) Principal purpose in entering K is SUBSTANTIALLY frustrated;
2) Frustration was SUBSTANTIAL in nature;
3) Non-occurrence of the event that caused frustration was a basic assumption of the K.
72
Rescission
Is permissible where both parties to a K have remaining performance due.
--Consideration is provided by each party's discharge of the other's duties.
73
Anticipatory Repudiation
AR may be established by:
1) party's definitive statement that it will breach; or
2) party's voluntary act that renders party unable to perform its contractual obligations.
NOTE: If AR cannot be established but there are REASONABLE GROUNDS FOR INSECURITY, the insecure party may make a demand for ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF PERFORMANCE. (failure to respond w/ reasonable assurances = AR. Must respond within reasonable time (30 days under UCC))
--In FL, the non-breaching must be able to show that he was able to perform any conditions precedent to performance in order to be able to claim damages under AR.
74
Quantum Meruit
Where a party failed to fulfill an express condition OR is in material breach, breaching party may still recover in quantum meruit.
Quantum meruit is a legal doctrine created to impose liability WITHOUT an enforceable contract. More specifically, quantum meruit allows a plaintiff to recover the reasonable value of services rendered. Quantum meruit actions result from implied contracts, or contracts implied in fact by courts to bring about justice and equity.
75
Failure of Condition under UCC
Under the perfect tender rule, terms of a K for sale of goods are enforced exactly, every K term treated as an express condition.
If seller fails to make perfect tender, buyer has 3 courses of action available:
1) Reject the goods;
--Must reject within reasonable time + notify seller
2) Accept the goods;
--Note: Buyer make seek damages for any non-conformity if seller has been seasonably notified
--Buyer can revoke acceptance if non-conformity SUBSTANTIALLY impairs value of the goods and if: (1) buyer accepted b/c unaware of non-conformity, or (2) seller assured cure but failed to cure.
3) Accept part and reject part.
-- Buyer can only do so in terms of commercial units of that good.
76
UCC: Work-Arounds for Breaching Sellers
1) If seller makes non-conforming tender but time for performance has not passed, then the seller may substitute conforming goods. (must give reasonable notice of intent to cure and deliver by K deadline)
2) Right to cure when there were reasonable grounds to believe delivery was acceptable (after K deadline)
(seller must give reasonable notice of intent to cure and deliver by K deadline)
--Belief must be based on buyer's express assurances, trade usage, course of dealing, or course of performance.
77
Imperfect Tender in Installment Ks
Under UCC, installment Ks are contracts that contemplate delivery of goods in separate lots to be separately accepted by buyer.
--Perfect Tender Rule does NOT apply.
--Buyer must generally give the seller an opportunity to cure any defects in the installment deliveries, unless seller "substantially impairs" the value of the entire K.
78
Defenses: Infancy/Minors Rule for Ks
Minors under (18) may enter into a K, but it is VOIDABLE AT MINOR'S OPTION.
--Power of avoidance:
1) minor is obligated to return any goods received but NOT LIABLE for any damages or reasonable value for use of any goods or services (Note that mentally incompetent person would be liable)
Ratification: Once minor turns 18, they
may expressly or impliedly ratify K
(compare: mentally incompetent person can ratify if becomes competent later on)
Necessaries Exception: K for necessaries (food, clothing, shelter, medical care) is VOIDABLE but merchant has quasi K to recover reasonable value of goods/services
79
Defenses: Fraudulent Misrepresentation
1) A MATERIAL misrepresentation;
2) with the intent to mislead (need scienter = knowing or purposeful)
3) reasonable reliance on misrepresentation
--Note: Non-fraudulent Misrepresentation = negligent misrepresentation and innoncent misrepresentation
--Negligent Misrepresentation = D would have known the assertion was false had he exercised reasonable care
--Innocent Misrepresentation = D made an assertion not in accord w/ existing facts
80
Defenses: Fraudulent Non-Disclosure
Fraud consists of D's silence when duty to disclose.
Elements:
1) nondisclosure was MATERIAL to K;
2) reasonable reliance on non-disclosure;
3) a duty of disclosure and failure to fulfill it
81
Defenses: Duress
1) A threat
2) wrongful in nature
--(I.e., a crime/tort, criminal prosecution or bad faith civil process, or threatened bad faith breach of K (economic duress))
3) no reasonable choice but to succumb to threat
(for economic duress, look for no adequate substitutes, threatened breach could cause aggrieved party to breach his own Ks, or alternative to acquiescence and suing for damages is inadequate to address harm caused)
82
Defenses: Public Policy
1) Subject of K itself is specifically prohibited by law
2) K formed for purpose of committing a crime or tort
3) K performance would violate certain values/freedoms designated by the state
Note: Look for covenants not to compete or use trademarks (won't be enforced if (1) contrary to public health, safety, welfare, (2) the injunction enforces an unreasonable covenant not to compete; and (3) there is no showing of irreparable injury.
83
Expectation Damages
The general rule for a breach of contract. This should be the starting point for EVERY analysis - this is the default award.
Aggrieved party will be entitled to amount that will restore him in the position he would've been in had the K not been fully performed.
Formula: (Loss of value of the breaching party's performance + any incidental / consequential costs generated by breach) - (any payments receied from breaching party) - (any costs saved as a result of breach)
84
Limitations on Right to Recover Expectation Damages
Aggrieved party may not be able to recover the full amount in the following situations:
1) Expectation damages can't be calculated w/ reasonable certainty;
--E.g., a business w/ no profit history
2) Damages are UNFORESEEABLE;
3) Where damages can be mitigated. (can't recover for losses you could avoid)
IF EXPECTATION DAMAGES ARE NOT AVAILABLE THEN GIVE RELIANCE DAMAGES.
85
Reliance Damages
Designed to restore the aggrieved party to the position he was in prior to K.
Aggrieved party's reliance is measured by:
1) Any expenditures made in preparation or performance or in actually performing; LESS
2) any loss suffered which the breaching party can prove the aggrieved party would have suffered even if K had been fully performed.
NOTE: Reliance damages may be available where expectation damages are not available, such as when they are too uncertain or speculative.
86
Restitutionary Damages
The value of benefits conferred upon other party in the transaction. (aka the market value of the services already rendered) This is in lieu of Expectation Damages.
Calculation:
1) reasonable value or cost of benefits conferred; or
2) extent to which the other party's property has increased in value b/c of the performance rendered.
NOTE: Aggrieved party is likely to elect to recover restitutionary damages when it would exceed the amount recoverable based on his expectation interest, and this is most likely to arise in the context of a "losing" K.
IMPORTANT LIMITATION: Available if aggrieved party has PARTIALLY PERFORMED but NOT if the party has fully performed.
87
Post-Employment Relief
K provision that prohibits post-employment competition.
1) Is there a SIGNIFICANT BUSINESS JUSTIFICATION for enforcing the restraint?
2) Is the scope of the non-compete clause REASONABLE IN DURATION and GEOGRAPHICAL REACH?
3) Is there an express provision? (court won't imply one)
88
Mid-term relief
When employee under K for a specific period of time and breaches by departing before the end of that period, a negative injunction will be available, even absent a K prohibition, to prevent competing if employee's services are UNIQUE AND EXTRAORDINARY. (pro athletes and entertainers)
89
Incidental Damages
Buyer or seller can recover incidental damages which are the expenses incurred in either the seller dealing w/ the goods after buyer's breach (e.g., storing them) or buyer arranging for cover (e.g., transportation costs).
--These are damages recovered under UCC
90
Consequential Damages
Under the UCC, the BUYER can additionally recover consequential damages that were reasonably foreseeable to the seller at the time the contract was entered into.
91
Intended Beneficiaries
One whom the contracting parties intended to benefit (often named in the K).
--Could be creditor beneficiary or donee beneficiary.
--Intended beneficiaries can sue the promisors who directly promised to provide the benefit, but can't sue the promisees based on the K, although they can still sue on any prior obligation (if any).
--COMPARE: Incidental beneficiaries are third parties who will benefit from a promisor's performance as a practical matter, but are not intended beneficiaries (no standing sue).
92
Vesting of 3rd Party Rights to Sue
Parties to a K are free to modify or rescind by mutual consent, and they may modify or rescind a third party beneficiary provision w/o consent UNLESS beneficiary's rights under the K have vested.
With intended beneficiaries, vesting occurs when:
1) Beneficiary brings suit on the matter.
2) Beneficiary changes position in justifiable reliance on K.
3) Beneficiary manifests assent to K at the request of promisor or promisee.
4) Rights of beneficiary have vested under express K terms.
93
Assignment and Delegation
Assignment = a transfer of a right to receive a contract performance
Delegation = Occurs when a third party agrees to satisfy a performance obligation owed by one of the parties to a K.
--Absent a novation, a delegation does not relieve the delegator from his obligations under K.
--Personal services are not delegable.
--If delegation was for consideration, delegator has breach of K action against delegatee for non-performance.
NOTE: Absent a delegation, an assignment does NOT transfer the obligations of the assignor under the K to the assignee.
