Contracts Flashcards
what prevails when the common law and UCC Article II differ on the sale of goods?
UCC
“goods” for UCC Article II purposes
tangible things, but not real estate, services, intangibles (patent, etc.)
Article II “merchant”
one who regularly deals in goods of the kind or otherwise holds himself out as having special knowledge or skills relative to the practices/goods sold
why are quasi-constructed?
to avoid unjust enrichment
unilateral contracts recognized under UCC
clear and unambiguous understanding that completion of performance is the only manner of acceptance
offer to the public, like a reward offer
void v. voidable contract
can’t be enforced v. party may elect to enforce
contract elements
mutual assent (offer and acceptance)
consideration (bargained-for exchange or substitute)
no defenses (mistake, illegality, statute of frauds, lack of capacity)
requisite specificity for subject in real estate contract
land and price terms
requisite specificity for subject in sale of goods contract
quantity
requisite specificity for subject in employment/services contract
duration for employment; nature of work for other services
if an accepted offer doesn’t specify duration for employment, considered terminable at the will of either party
when is a contract missing terms still deemed formed?
parties intended to make a contract
reasonably certain basis for remedy (court can supply reasonable terms, like price for goods or reasonable time for completion)
offer when a material term is ambiguous?
no; neither under common law nor UCC (different from missing term!)
how can uncertainty of a vague term by cured?
acceptance or full performance
when can an offer be indirectly revoked?
when offeree receives:
correct info
from a reliable source
of offeror’s acts indicating to a RPP the offer is off the table
(sold the car to someone else)
when is revocation effective?
when received by offeree (unless published; then it’s effective when published)
under UCC Art. II, how long is a merchant’s firm offer open (not revocable) without consideration
often stated; otherwise a reasonable time, up to three months
(if the offer says the option will stay open for more than three months, it’s only valid for three months)
when does a unilateral offer become irrevocable?
once performance has begun
counteroffer: new offer or rejection?
both
test for mere inquiry or counteroffer
whether a reasonable person would believe the original offer was rejected
when is rejection effective?
when received by offeror
what operations of law terminate an offer?
death or insanity of either party
destruction of K’s subject matter
supervening illegality
can an offeree’s power of acceptance be assigned?
generally not
if A sends B an offer and B sends A the same offer, is a K formed? what if the offers contain the same terms?
never. offeree must be aware of the offer!
if A finds O’s watch and returns it to O without knowledge of O’s reward offer, does A have a contractual right to the reward?
no
is the offeree of a unilateral contact required to give the offeror notice that performance has begun?
no, but notice of completion is required within a reasonable time
when can silence constitute acceptance of a bilateral offer?
when, given prior dealings or trade practices, silence as acceptance is commercially reasonable
how does UCC Art. II construe shipment of nonconforming goods?
acceptance creating bilateral K and a breach
UNLESS seller seasonably notifies buyer that a shipment of nonconforming goods is offered only as an accommodation
is a buyer required to accept an accommodation?
no
what happens if a buyer rejects an accommodation? wny?
shipper is not in breach; may reclaim the goods because her tender doesn’t constitute acceptance of the original offer
under UCC Art. II, how is an offer to buy goods for current or prompt shipment construed to invite acceptance?
by promise to ship, or by current/prompt shipment of conforming OR nonconforming (accommodation) goods
does the accommodation rule apply when shipment is not used as the form of acceptance?
no
does UCC Art. II adhere to the mirror image rule?
no (but recall, Art. II doesn’t apply to real estate, services, etc. – mirror image rule still applies there)
Under UCC Art. II, when an offer for purchase or sale of goods is accepted with additional terms, is the acceptance valid?
yes
Under UCC Art. II, when any party is a nonmerchant, what is the impact of additional or different terms?
mere proposals–terms of the offer govern
Under UCC Art. II, when both parties are merchants, are ADDITIONAL terms accepted?
usually, unless:
- they materially offer original terms
- offer expressly limits acceptance to its terms
- offeror already objected to terms or does so within a reasonable time
Under UCC Art. II, when both parties are merchants, are DIFFERENT terms accepted?
authorities split (some follow knockout rule, some treat different terms as additional terms)
how to construe acceptance made expressly conditional on the acceptance of new terms?
rejection
what if a contract is not formed by parties’ communications, but they begin to perform as if they formed a contract?
formation!
mailbox rule
acceptance by mail creates a contract at the moment of dispatch, provided the mail is properly addressed and stamped
mailbox rule exceptions
offer stipulates acceptance not effective until received
option contact involved
offeree sends rejection then acceptance (whichever ARRIVES first is effective)
does mailbox rule apply to rejection or revocation?
no; the rule applies only to acceptance
Per UCC, when is an auction sale complete?
When the auctioneer so announces by the fall of the hammer
consideration elements
bargained for exchange
of legal value (benefit to promisor/detriment to promisee)
does past or moral action as consideration constitute a bargain?
no
can a preexisting legal duty constitute consideration?
no, unless:
- new or diff consideration is promised
- promise is to ratify a voidable obligation
- preexisting duty is owed to a third person
- honest dispute per duty
- unforeseen circumstances sufficient to discharge
may a promise to refrain from suing on a claim constitute consideration?
yes, if the claim is valid or the claimant believed in good faith that the claim was valid
when can a contract be voidable on grounds of mutual mistake?
BOTH parties mistaken about existing facts re:
- a basic assumption
- mistake has material effect on the exchange
- party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk of the mistake
who can void a contract on grounds of mutual mistake?
the adversely affected party
fraud in the inducement and recourse
party induces another into K by fraudulent misrepresentation; K voidable by innocent party is she justifiably relied on the misrepresentation
material misrepresentation and recourse
innocent party justifiably relied on misrepresentation (fraudulent or not) and the point was material. Voidable.
must fraudulent misrepresentation by spoken or written?
no; can be inferred from conduct. (concealing a fact, frustrating investigation of a fact, etc.)
when can an innocent party take action against misrepresentation?
immediately–doesn’t need to sue on the K; can affirmatively act in equity to rescind the agreement and pursue all breach of K remedies