Contracts Flashcards
Merchants
One who regularly deals in goods of a kind or hold themselves out as having special knowledge or skills as to the goods involved
Offer
Words/conduct that objectively manifest intent to enter a K
The terms must be definite and clear
– real estate Ks must include price and identify the land
– UCC Ks must include quantity
Termination
Effective when received. Can be by lapse of time (not accepted w/in reasonable time), rejection (express or counteroffer), or by revocation, which can be direct, indirect, or by operation of law
– Indirect - Offeree becomes aware of offeror’s unambiguous conduct or statement from a reliable source
– operation of law - death, insanity, destruction of SM, etc.
Option Ks and Firm Offers
CL - offers are irrevocable for the specific time only if offeree gives consideration
UCC Firm offer - offer is irrevocable if
(1) offeror is a merchant,
(2) the offer is in signed writing, and
(3) gives assurances to stay open for time stated (no more than 3m)
Acceptance under UCC
Buyer’s order to purchase is an offer, and it can be accepted by
- a return promise to ship the goods
- a prompt shipment of conforming goods
A shipment of non-conforming goods = an acceptance AND a breach UNLESS the seller sends an accommodation notice, which is a counteroffer that can be accepted or rejected as a whole
UCC battle of the forms
UCC allows for acceptance to include additional terms if they are not conditional
- For non-merchants, additional terms become proposals for modification that can be accepted
- For merchants, additional terms will be included in K unless they are material or offeror rejects it
Confirmatory memo w additional terms will be subject to the battle of the forms
Mailbox rule
Acceptance by mail is effective at dispatch (if properly addressed and stamped)
- Not applicable to option Ks or if the offer stipulates that acceptance is effective upon receipt
- If offeree sends both an acceptance and rejection, the first one to arrive is effective
Past consideration / pre-existing duty
Does not satisfy consideration UNLESS:
- If a past obligation is unenforceable, and a new promise is made in writing or partially performed, it will be enforceable
- If new or different consideration is promised,
- If the pre-existing duty is owed to a third party,
- If there is an honest dispute as to duty, or
- If the modification is fair and equitable in view of unforeseen circumstances
Absence of Defenses
- Lack of capacity – incapacitated Ds can disaffirm a K – voidable K
- Duress (assent by improper threat) and undue influence (undue susceptibility – excessive pressure) – voidable K
- Misunderstanding - binding K based on ignorant party’s belief
- Mutual mistake of fact – k voidable by adversely affected party if (1) the mistake concerns a basic assumption under which K is made, (2) it has a material effect on the exchange, and (3) the party seeking avoidance did not assume the risk
- Unilateral mistake – K is voidable if the non-mistaken party knew or had reason to know of the mistake
- Misrepresentation – K is voidable by innocent party if the innocent party justifiably relied on the misrepresentation and the misrepresentation was material
- Illegality – K is void > BUT exceptions make it voidable, such as P is unaware of illegality while D is aware
- Unconscionability – allows the court to modify or refuse K to avoid unfair terms
Statute of Frauds requirements and exceptions for part performance
SOF requires any writing(s) that (1) identify the subject matter of the K, (2) indicate a K has been made by the parties, and (3) state all essential (UCC) / material (common law) terms
– exceptions:
- part performance for land Ks = 2/3 of payment, possession, and valuable improvements
- part performance if the goods are specially manufactured & already paid for/accepted. for specially manufactured goods, enforceable K if seller has made a substantial beginning
Confirmatory memo rule – if merchant sells a written confirmation of the understanding that meets SoF, it will bind recipient if they have reason to know of memo & do not object w/in 10d
Parol Evidence Rule
Excludes evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements contradicting the final writing
- Requires an completely integrated writing intended as a final expression of the K
— Evid. admissible to show intent
Partial integration = additional non-contradictory terms permitted
Risk of loss
- Non carrier merchant seller – risk of loss passes to buyer when they take physical possession
- Non carrier non merchant – risk of loss passes to the buyer upon tender of delivery (instructions)
- Carrier shipment Ks – risk of loss passes to buyer when seller delivers goods to carrier
- Destination Ks – risk of loss passes to buyer only when buyer takes delivery
If the goods are destroyed by no fault of either party and the risk of loss has not been passed to buyer, the K is avoided
Modification of the contract
CL – requires new consideration UNLESS the modification is fair and equitable in view of unforeseen circumstances
UCC – req. a good faith basis – no consideration needed
Promissory estoppel
Consideration not necessary if enforcement is necessary to prevent injustice. Req:
(1) The promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance, and
(2) Such action or forbearance is in fact induced.
Excuses for non-performance
- Insecurity - when a party has reasonable grounds to believe the other party will be unable to perform, they may demand adequate assurances and suspend performance in the meantime
- Anticipatory repudiation – one party makes an unambiguous statement or conduct prior to performance indicating he will not perform
— can be withdrawn unless other party has either materially changed position in reliance, cancelled the K, or indicated the repudiation is final - Impracticable – performance is only possible with extreme and unreasonable difficulty /expense b/c of an unforeseen event, which neither party assumed would occur
- Impossible – performance is objectively impossible b/c of an unforeseen event
- Frustration of purpose – when (1) an unexpected event destroys one or both party’s purpose for entering the K; (2) the unforeseen event is not the fault of the frustrated party; and (3) the non-occurrence of the event was a basic assumption of the K
- Rescission – both parties agreement to rescind - in itself a new K supported by consideration