Con Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Case or controversy

A

(1) standing
(2) ripeness
(3) mootness
(4) not a political question or advisory opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Standing

A

A party must have a concrete interest in the claim
(1) injury
(2) causation
(3) redressibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

third party standing

A

P may assert the rights of a third party where P has standing and either
- the injured third party is unlikely / unable to assert their rights, OR
- Injury has adversely affected P’s relationship with the third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

third party org standing

A

Org may sue on members’ behalf if:
- Injury to the members that would give members standing to sue individually;
- Injury is related to the organization’s purpose; and
- Neither claim nor relief requires participation of individual members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ripeness

A

The dispute must be matured. Only applies to laws pre-enforcement if
(1) the issue is fit for judicial decision, and
(2) P would suffer substantial hardship in the absence of review

Depends on likelihood of enforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mootness

A

Suffering from an on-going injury. Exceptions
- controversies capable of repetition by avoiding review
- Voluntary cessation by D that can resume them at any time
- class action where at least one claim is viable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

11th Amendment - Sovereign immunity

A

Bars suits against state govt in fed court unless
(1) the state waives sovereign immunity or consents,
(2) the suit involves the enforcement of laws under sec. 5 of the 14th Am. and Congress has removed immunity,
(3) the fed. govt. brings the suit, or
(4) bankruptcy proceedings

But suits against state officers can be brought in fed. court if the suit involves either:
- Injunctive relief claim for violation of the Const. or fed. law, or
- Claim for money damages to be paid by the state officer personally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SCOTUS jdx

A

SCOTUS has OG jdx over suits between states and cases involving foreign ambassadors/ministers.
- Must be filed in fed. court (but suits between states must be filed in SCOTUS)
- Congress cannot expand Court’s OG jdx to other types of cases

SCOTUS also has appellate jdx over cases with a final judgment
- Discretionary review – by writ of certiorari >
- Mandatory review — the Court must take appeals from three-judge district court panels regarding injunctive relief > This bypasses the courts of appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Powers of Congress

A

Taxing and Spending Clause
- Congress has the power to tax if the tax is intended to raise revenue OR if Congress has the power to regulate what is being taxed
- Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare

Commerce Clause - Congress may regulate channels, instrumentalities, or economic activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
May also regulate intrastate economic activities if there is a rational basis to conclude that the activity, in aggregate, substantially affects interstate commerce.

Property Powers - Power to make rules for territories and other prop of the US.

Necessary and Proper clause - grants Congress the power to legislate to enforce rights under other clauses

Postal, admiralty, and power over aliens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Restrictions on grants

A

Conditions are valid if:
(1) clearly stated
(2) related to the purpose of the program
(3) not unduly coercive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Federalism limitations - supremacy clause

A
  • Supremacy Clause > fed preemption (impossible to meet both laws), express preemption, and field preemption (congressional scheme is so comprehensive)
  • Full faith and Credit Clause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Federalism limitations - Dormant Commerce Clause

A
  • Dormant Commerce Clause
    — regulations that favor local business or intentionally discriminate against interstate is invalid unless (1) state is market participant, (2) necessary to an important, non-econ state interest w no reasonable alternatives available, or (3) govt action regarding a traditional govt function
    — regulations that create an incidental burden on interstate commerce are invalid if they impose an undue burden (the court balances the legitimate state int. vs burden on commerce)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Federalism limitations - Art IV privileges and immunities

A

Prohibits intentionally protectionist discrimination from a state to non resident if it involves the non resident’s commercial activities or fundamental rights.

std - important govt interest with no less restrictive means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

State Taxes

A

Cannot be discriminatory. if they are not, there still needs to be
(1) substantial nexus to the state,
(2) apportionment, and
(3) relation between tax and benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Government action

A

A government actions is one taken by government officials or private entities that are either
(1) performing an exclusive public function, or
(2) where there is entwinement between the govt and the private entity is significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Levels of scrutiny

A
  • Rational basis – a law will be upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate govt. purpose > cannot be irrational or arbitrary
  • Intermediate scrutiny – a law will be upheld if it is substantially related to an important govt. purpose > reasonable and narrowly tailored
    — for gender discrimination, may also req the govt to show an exceedingly persuasive justification
  • Strict scrutiny – a law will be upheld if it is necessary to achieve a compelling govt. interest > no less restrictive or burdensome means of achieving its goal
17
Q

Procedural due process

A

Usually fair procedures, an unbiased decision-maker, and notice of the govt.’s action is required. Determined by balancing:
- Importance of the individual interest involved, and
- Value of procedural safeguards to that interest, against
- Govt. interest (i.e., fiscal or administrative efficiency)

18
Q

Substantive due process

A

Whether govt has adequate reasons for depriving life, liberty, or property
- Non-fundamental rights – rational basis
- Fundamental rights – strict scrutiny

19
Q

Equal protection

A

(1) Is there a discriminatory classification?
- Law discriminates on its face
- Facially-neutral law applied in a discriminatory manner + intent
- Discriminatory purpose / disparate impact + intent

(2) What level of scrutiny applies given the classification?
- Suspect classifications — strict scrutiny (race, national origin, fundamental rights, some alienage)
- Quasi-suspect classifications — intermediate scrutiny (gender, non-marital children)
- All other alleged classifications — rational basis (alienage if related to self-govt or immigration, age)

(3) Does the classification satisfy the appropriate level of scrutiny?

20
Q

Protected speech

A

Content-based restriction (based on subject matter or viewpoint) – strict scrutiny

Content-neutral restriction – intermediate scrutiny - the govt can place time, place, and manner regulations
- Public forum / designated public forums – upheld if
(1) content-neutral,
(2) narrowly tailored to serve an important govt purpose, and
(3) leave open adequate, alternative channels of communication
- Limited public forums / non-public forums – upheld if:
(1) viewpoint neutral and
(2) reasonably related to legitimate govt. purpose

21
Q

Unprotected or lesser-protected speech

A

Incitement of imminent unlawful activity – govt may punish speech if (clear and present danger):
- There is a substantial likelihood the speech will bring about imminent illegal activity; and
- The speech is aimed at causing imminent illegality

Fighting words – Govt may punish speech if it is likely to cause an immediate violent response against the speaker

True threats – a threat communicated with the intent to place the recipient in fear of bodily harm is not protected speech

Obscenity – expression is obscene if:
- (1) It appeals to prurient interests (sexually stimulating) (average person in the community std)
- (2) It is patently offensive in its sexual portrayal (offends community standards)
- (3) The material lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value (national std)

Pornography — private possession is not punishable unless it involves child pornography

Profanity/indecent speech — generally protected unless the speech is aired over broadcast media (not cable), or occurs in public schools

22
Q

Commercial speech

A

Commercial speech is not protected if it is false/misleading/deceptive, or illegal/concerns illegal activity

Speech that concerns lawful activity and is not misleading can only be regulated if
- There is a substantial govt. interest in regulating the speech
- The regulation directly advances that govt. interest; and
- The regulation is not more extensive than necessary to serve that govt. interest

23
Q

Defamation

A

If defamation involves a public figure, official, and/or public concern, P must prove:
- Falsity – P must prove the statement was false
- Fault – P must prove D was at fault (+ malice for public figure/officer)

24
Q

Takings clause

A

Prohibits govt from taking private property without providing just compensation.

(1) Has there been a taking?
- Possessory taking – govt takes or occupies physical property
- Regulatory taking – govt action that adversely affects property value; depends on extent of economic interference:

  • (2) Is the taking for public use?
  • (3) Is just compensation paid? – measured in terms of loss (fair market value at time of taking)
25
Q

punishment of govt employee speech

A

When speech relates to the employee’s official duties, it can be punished or regulated based on content

when the speech involves a public concern, the court balances the employee’s interest vs employers interest

When the speech involves private matters, it. can be regulated if its disruptive to the work place

26
Q

Prior restrains

A

Whether a societal harm justifies the restrain. Not favored and rarely allowed.

Content-based - strict scrutiny
content-neutral - intermediate scrutiny

27
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

Prohibits govt. from punishing someone based on that person’s religious beliefs. Strict scrutiny applies.
Only applies to laws that are discriminatory on its face or neutral but intended to limit/interfere with religious practice/belief

28
Q

Establishment Clause

A

Prohibits govt. acts that establish /sponsor /coerce religion or give preference to one religion over another

Std - must be neutral, not coercive, history and tradition approach, and Founder’s intent