Contracts Flashcards

contract to kill me

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

offer

A

communication indicating that the offeror is willing to enter into a contract on the basis of the offered terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

are advertisements offers?

A

advertisements are NEVER offers on the MBE
they are invitations for offers
advertisement + response = offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is always required in a contract for the sale of goods

A

quantity term -> only essential term required in a goods K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

revocation rule

A

an offer can be revoked by the offeror at any time prior to acceptance with notice to the offeree (direct or indirect notice)
even if the offeror promised not to revoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

option contract

A

offeree pays consideration to have the offeror hold the option open for a period of time in which the offer cannot be revoked
can be for any duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

in what fact patterns does detrimental reliance typically arise?

A

subcontractor/contractor
Subcontractor submits bid to gen contractor
Sub can’t revoke his bid after the gen submits his bid in reliance on the sub’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a bid in contracts context?

A

a bid is an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what type of irrevocable offer is only available under the UCC

A

the firm offer
merchant’s firm offer rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

elements of a merchant’s firm offer

A

1- a merchant
2- promises to hold the offer open
3- in a signed writing
4- that is enforceable for a period of time, up to three months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Under the UCC, a buyer’s order to purchase goods is considered an offer and the seller may accept by:

A

1- a return promise to ship the goods
2- prompt shipment of the conforming goods
3- a shipment of nonconforming goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

a shipment of nonconforming goods is considered a what by the seller if sent without an accommodation notice

A

Considered an acceptance and a breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when is a seller’s shipment of nonconforming goods NOT considered a breach

A

if the seller sends the nonconforming goods to the buyer with a notice that they couldn’t perfectly fill the order and nonconforming goods are sent in the hope that the buyer can use them instead of the conforming goods -> this is a COUNTEROFFER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

accommodation notice

A

seller sends the nonconforming goods to the buyer with a notice that they couldn’t perfectly fill the order and nonconforming goods are sent in the hope that the buyer can use them instead of the conforming goods -> not a breach but a COUNTEROFFER to the buyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what can a buyer do in response to receiving nonconforming goods

A

1- Accept the whole
2- reject the whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

if the buyer accepts the nonconforming goods, what is the result

A

the buyer and seller have created a new contract with the nonconforming goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

mirror image rule- UCC or common law

A

common law rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the mirror image rule

A

acceptance must be on exact same terms as the offer
any deviation results in a rejection and counteroffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

battle of the forms- UCC or common law

A

UCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

battle of the forms

A

rules that govern the sale of goods and the acceptance contains an additional or different term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Both parties are merchants and the change is not material (battle of the forms)

A

the change is incorporated into the contract unless the offeror objects within a reasonable time then the change is eliminated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

if both parties are merchants and the change is material (battle of the forms)

A

this is an acceptance with a proposal to modify the terms

With no further action, the change is eliminated and there is a contract on the terms of the original offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

if you’re dealing with the sale of goods and the acceptance contains an additional or different term, is this a valid acceptance?

A

YES! This functions as an acceptance under the UCC.
The issue is whether the additional/new term is part of the K with the battle of the forms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

material change to a K

A

the change is material if including it would result in a surprise or hardship if done without the other party’s knowledge

  • any change that substantially affects the economic risks or benefits is material

examples:
- indemnification clauses
- disclaimers of warranties
- change that alters the usual remedy for breach of K

24
Q

consideration

A

a bargained-for exchange of something of legal value

There is valid consideration if someone:
- promises to do something that he has a legal right not to do
- promises not to do something that he has a legal right to do

no consideration for giving up something illegal
a promise to quit illegal drugs for a period of time is not valid consideration bc doing those drugs is illegal

25
Q

is there consideration:
P finds D’s lost dog with an address on the collar and returns the dog to D, hoping for a reward. On receipt of the dog, D says “I promise to give you $100 tomorrow for returning my dog”. Is there consideration for D’s promise?

A

No. Consideration is not valid for things you’ve already done- there’s no bargained-for exchange

26
Q

Contracts covered by the statute of frauds

A

Marriage (in consideration of - prenups)
Year (contracts that cannot be performed in one year)
Land contracts (real estate deals)
Executors of wills
Goods (contracts for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more)
Suretyship: contracts to answer for the debt of another

27
Q

requirements for a writing to satisfy the SoF

A
  1. writing must contain:
    - identify of the parties
    - description of the subject matter
    - terms necessary to make the K definite
  2. and be signed by the party to be charged
28
Q

essential terms needed in a writing for land sale Ks

A

description and price of land

29
Q

essential terms needed in a writing for an employment K

A

length of employment

30
Q

essential terms needed in a writing for the sale of goods

A

quantity

31
Q

when can a land sale contract satisfy the SoF without a writing

A

with part performance that unequivocally indicates that the contract was for a sale of land

32
Q

when can a services contract satisfy the SoF without a writing

A

with full performance by either party

33
Q

when can a sale of goods contract satisfy the SoF without a writing

A

two situations in which part performance will satisfy the statute:
1- the goods have been accepted or paid for by the buyer
2- the goods are to be specially manufactured and the seller has made a substantial start in doing so

34
Q

Partial acceptance example:
Seller orally agrees to deliver three trucks to buyer at $100k per truck. After the first truck is delivered and accepted, the seller cancels and the buyer sues for breach.
Seller raises the SoF as a defense.
What is the result?

A

The SoF is satisfied for the first truck but not for the other two.
The buyer can enforce the terms of the K for the first truck (demand payment) but the buyer cannot demand delivery of the other two trucks bc the seller has a valid SoF defense for the other two trucks

34
Q

parol evidence rule

A

if both parties intend a writing to be the final version of the deal, evidence of oral or written statements made prior to the writing or at the same time are inadmissible

if only one party reduces the agreement to writing –> no parol evidence rule

35
Q

when does the PER not apply?

A

anytime the validity of the K is in question, interpretation issues, reformation, and additional terms under UCC with course of performance, course of dealing, usage of trade etc

36
Q

shipment contracts

A

risk of loss passes to buyer once the seller delivers the goods to a common carrier

if not specified, shipment K presumed

37
Q

destination contract

A

risk of loss passes to the buyer after goods are tendered at their destination

38
Q

non carrier case- seller is a merchant

A

seller has the risk of loss until buyer takes physical possession of the goods

39
Q

non- carrier case- seller is not a merchant

A

risk passes to the buyer when the goods are tendered to the buyer

40
Q

what types of warranties can be disclaimed

A

express warranties only

41
Q

express warranties

A

seller makes a statement of fact or a promise describing the goods or providing samples or models

42
Q

common law contract modification requirements

A

consideration is required for modification to be enforceable

look for preexisting duty rule language in answer choice

43
Q

UCC contract modification requirements

A

consideration is NOT required but the parties must act in good faith in the modification
not acting with extortion

44
Q

what may the nonbreaching party do under common law if there was a material breach

A

nonbreaching party:
- no longer has to perform (duty to perform is discharged)
- has the right to all remedies for breach

45
Q

what may the nonbreaching party do under common law if there was a minor breach

A

nonbreaching party:
- gets the substantial benefit of the bargain
- still has to perform under the K
- must offset damages

46
Q

perfect tender rule under the UCC

A

both the goods and the delivery must perfectly conform to the terms of the contract. Any variation is a breach

47
Q

common situations where there is no anticipatory breach (other party still has to perform)

A
  • expressions of doubt about whether you’ll be able to perform
  • clear statement of repudiation but no reliance
  • choices indicate that a writing is required (it is not)
48
Q

when can an anticipatory repudiation NOT be retracted?

A

once the nonbreaching party has acted in reliance on the repudiation

49
Q

substantial performance

A

only recognized under common law

defense when one party has substantially completed his contract obligations but not perfectly and the other party wants to sue for breach -> court won’t recognize this as a breach of K bc the other party substantially performed and the nonbreaching party received the benefit by the party ->

50
Q

compensatory damages

A

places the non-breaching party in the position that he would have been in had the contract been completed
two types:
- expectation
- consequential

this is the main goal of damages in contracts!!! write this on the test!!!

51
Q

expectation damages

A
  • always available
  • gives the non-breaching party the amount she would have gotten had the K been completed (benefit of the bargain)
52
Q

consequential damages

A
  • special damages based on a particular situation
  • damages that occur after the breach due to the particular situation of the non-breaching party
53
Q

when is specific performance available

A

real estate contracts
sale of goods if the good is unique

54
Q

when can a contract with a third party bene be modified or canceled without the consent of the third party bene?

A

Until the rights of the TPB have vested

55
Q

when have the rights of the TPB vested?

A

1- third party assents to the K
2- third party learns of the K and detrimentally relies on the K
3- third party brings a lawsuit to enforce the K