contract law (remedies and discharge) Flashcards
what is the aim of awarding damages?
compensate C
what are the 2 main ways of awarding damages?
1) expectation interest
2) reliance test
what is the normal way of awarding damages?
expectation interest = put innocent party in same position post-breach that they should have been in, if the contract was performed properly. (forward-looking)
what are the 3 different ways that expectation interest can be measured?
1) cost of curing defective performance
2) difference in value between performance receive and that promised; or
3) loss in amenity: sum represents that the performance received is less valuable to the innocent party than that promised, even if economic value is the same
what is the reliance test?
it is back-ward looking and aims to put C in position as if they had never contracted. more likely to be used when expectation measure is hard to calculate
what type of expenditure does the reliance test allow recovery of?
only allows recovery of wasted expenditure (not all expenditure)
when do you use cost of cure to calculate damages?
normally for defective works as represents cost of substitute or remedial work required to put C in potion they would have been in had the contract been properly performed
C must act reasonably in relation to defective works
when do you use loss of amenity to calculate damages?
available remedy when their loss is not economic in value, but nevertheless has value to them.
in commercial setting, it is unusual if not impossible for damages to be awarded via loss of amenity
what expenses does the reliance test allow a claimant to recover?
allows them to recover expenses which have been incurred in preparing for, or in part performance of, the contract which have been rendered pointless by the breach.
what is the general rule to damages for mental distress, anguish or annoyance?
they are generally not recoverable.
however, exception is may be recoverable where the whole, or perhaps a major purpose of the contract is to provide pleasure, relaxation and peace of mind
are damages awarded for loss of reputation?
general rule is no they will not be awarded
when can you claim for damages for loss of chance?
if lost chance is quantifiable in monetary terms and there was a real and substantial chance that the opportunity might have come to fruition.
what is the percentage that you must prove in order to get damages for loss of chance and what is the burden of proof?
chance of obtaining a benefit is 50% or greater, C should seek to recover their expectation loss in full in the usual way, and they will succeed if this can be proved on the balance of probability
what is the 2 part test in Hadley v Baxendale in relation to damages cannot be recovered for loss which are ‘too remote’?
it sets out what is deemed ‘too remote’
losses which neither:
1) arise naturally according to the usual course of things from the contract; nor
2) were or should have been in the contemplation of both parties
does an innocent party need to mitigate their losses?
you cannot recover losses which would have been avoided if the party had taken reasonable steps to mitigate its loss.
is there a duty to mitigate a claim for a payment of a debt (liquidated damages)?
no there is no need because this amount is payable as a contractual right and not as damages
what is the exceptional basis of ‘restitution interest’?
it is the measure of damages on the basis of restoring to the C a benefit which the defaulting party acquired at their expense.
when does a restitution interest claim arise?
it arises when there is a total failure of consideration