Contract Law - Intention Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What approach do the courts take? (AO1)

A

Objective approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the presumption in Domestic/Social agreements with a case to support? (AO1) x2

A

No legal relation intended.

Balfour V Balfour:

Agreement was not made in contemplation of divorce so it was held as domestic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the presumption in Business/Commercial agreements with a case to support? (AO1) x2

A

Did intend to crest legal relation.

Edwards V Skyways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In some cases what can occur to the presumption? With a case to support. (AO1) x2

A

It can be rebutted.

Jones V Vernon Pools:

Business agreement rebutted as contract stated it was ‘binding in honour only’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What occurs in a half way house situation? (AO1)

A

The burden of proof falls to the party trying to prove a valid contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The presumption in Business/ Commercial agreements is fair because? With a case to support. (AO3)

A

It creates certainty.

Edwards V Skyways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a counter point for the presumption in Business/Commercial agreements creating certainty? Case to support. (AO3)

A

Still creates uncertainty as it can be rebutted.

Jones V Vernon Pools: Rebutted for ‘binding in honour only’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is the presumption in Domestic/Social agreements fair? Case to support. (AO3)

A

Prevents Floodgates.

Wilson V Burnet: Three women at a bingo game.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a counterpoint to the presumption in Domestic/Social agreements being fair? Case to support. (AO3)

A

Unjust conclusions of not rebutted.

Parker V Clarke: Two couples, home property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is the objective approach fair? Case to support. (AO3)

A

Prevents disagreement between parties and dishonesty.

Simpkins V pays: Lodger entered competition under land lords name. Bound more than a social agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a counter point to the objective approach being fair? Case to support. (AO3)

A

Difficult to decipher between Domestic/Social agreements and Business/Commercial.

Sadler V Reynolds: Contract between Journalist and Business woman who were friends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How would you conclude an evaluation essay on Intention.

A

Addressing the question as to whether the law on Intention is ____ or not. (Reference key words in question)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly