Contract Formation: Mutual Assent - Offer; Acceptance Flashcards
Who may accept offer?
- person to whom addressed
- person who is member of class to whom offer is made
- generally, can’t be assigned (exception –> option)
What is the rule re: knowledge of offer?
- In order to accept, offeree must know of offer.
- Thus, if A and B send each other identical offers, but there’s no knowledge, there is no K
NOTE –> for unilateral K, there still must be knowledge. So for example, if owner offers reward for missing watch, and finder bring watch without knowing about award, he is not legally entitled to the award.
What is the rule re: acceptance of unilateral K by performance?
- Offer is not accepted until performance is completed
2. Beginning of performance may create an option so that offer is not revocable
What is the rule re: notice of acceptance and unilateral K?
- Offereee is NOT required to give offeror notice that he has begun performance, but IS required to give notice within reasonable time after performance is complete.
Exception:
- offeror waived notice;
- performance would normally come to offeror’s attention within reasonable time
What is the rule re: acceptance of bilateral K by performance?
may be accepted by promise to perform, or beginning performance
What is the rule re: notice of acceptance and bilateral K?
Generally - acceptance must be communicated, unless offer provides that it does not.
HOWEVER –> if due to prior dealings or trade practices, it would be commercially reasonable for silence to be treated as acceptance, the court may so find.
Also, if recipient of services knows or should have known that services were being rendered with the expectation of compensation, and could have prevented the mistake, she may be held to have accepted if she fails to speak.
What is the rule with regards to method of acceptance?
Unless otherwise provided, an offer is construed as inviting acceptance in “any reasonable manner” and by any medium reasonable under the circumstances.
What is the rule with regards to method of acceptance and “offers to buy goods for current or prompt shipment”?
Under UCC Art 2, offer to buy goods for current or prompt shipment may be accepted by:
- promise to ship; or
- current or prompt shipment of conforming or non-conforming goods
What is the special rule re: shipment of non-conforming goods?
Under UCC, shipment of non-conforming goods is:
- an acceptance, creating a bilateral K; and
- a breach of K UNLESS seller notifies buyer that shipment of non-conforming goods is offered only as an ACCOMMODATION
NOTE: Buyer is NOT required to accept accommodation goods, and may reject them. If he does, shipper is not in breach and may reclaim the accommodation goods, bc her tender does not constitute an acceptance of buyer’s original order
EXAM TIP –> note that if contract is made by promise to ship, there can be no accommodation
What is the rule with regards to acceptance in sale of goods if there are additional or different terms?
- proposing additional or different terms by offeree in a definite and timely acceptance is EFFECTIVE as an acceptance UNLESS:
- acceptance is expressly made conditional on acceptance of additional or different terms
If there are additional terms in an acceptance to a sale of goods, what terms govern?
If EITHER party is non-merchant –> terms of offer govern
If BOTH parties are merchants –> ADDITIONAL terms included unless:
(i) they materially alter terms; OR
(ii) offer expressly limits acceptance to terms of offer; OR
(iii) Offeror objects within a reasonable time
What happens if there are different terms in an acceptance to a sale of goods?
- some courts follow same rule as for additional terms
- some courts follow “knockout rule” –> conflicting terms in offer and acceptance are knocked out of K. Terms may be substituted by UCC
NOTE: there still must be meeting of the minds.
What is the special rule re: “merchant’s confirmatory memo”?
Situation –> there was an oral agreement btwn merchants, and then a written confirmatory memo was sent with additional or different terms
Result –> battle of the forms rules will apply. Will have the same outcome as if it was an acceptance with different/additional terms
What is the rule re: “conditional acceptance” under UCC art 2?
- it is a rejection, and new offer.
- original offeror may form new contract by expressly assenting to new terms, however it CANNOT be accepted by performance.
- if parties ship/accept terms after conditional acceptance, a K is formed by their conduct NOT including new terms
When is “acceptance” effective? (Mailbox rule)
Acceptance by mail/similar means creates a K at moment of dispatch, unless:
- offer stipulates that not effective until receipt;
- option contract is involved (here, only effective upon receipt)
- if offeree send rejection THEN acceptance, whichever arrives first is effective
- If offeree sends acceptance THEN rejection, acceptance is effective UNLESS:
- rejection arrived first; and
- offeror detrimentally relied on it