Content Area E: Behavior Change Procedures Flashcards
Discriminant Operant
a behavior that occurs more frequently under some antecedent conditions than it does in others
Stimulus control
Becase a discriminated operant occurs at a higher frequency in the presense of a given stimulus than it does in the absence of that stimulus it is said to be under stimulus control.
A stimulus acquires control only when responses emitted in the presense of that stimulus produce reinforcement more often than responses in the absence of stimulus.
Sd
An SD is a stimulus that controls a type of behavior because that stimulus has been related to the differential availability of an effective reinforcer for that type of behavior. Differential availability means that the relevant consequence has been available in the presence of, and unavailable in the presense of, the stimulus.
A true SD constitutes at least a probabalistic guarantee that the relevant consequence will follow the response (pg.377)
Three-term contingency
antecedent, behavior and consequence, is sometimes called the ABCs of behavior analysis
Contingency
the temporal and functional relations between behavior and antecedent and consequent variables
Contingent
when a reinforcer (or punisher) is said to be contingent on a particular behavior, the behavior must be emmited for the consequence to occur
Abolishing operation (AO)
Value-altering effect: A decrease in the current effectiveness of some stimulus, object, or event as reinfrocement
Behavior-altering effect: A decrease in the current requency of all behavior that has been reinforced by that stimulus, object, or event (i.e. abatative effect)
Establishing operations (EO)
Any environmental variable that:
(a) alters the effectiveness of some stimulus, object, or even as reinforcer
(b) alters the current frequency of all behavior that has been reinforced by that stimulus, object, or event
Motivating Operations (MO)
(a) alter the effectiveness of some stimulus as a reinforcer, the value-altering effect;
(b) alters the current frequency of all behavior that has been reinforced by that stimulus, the behavior-altering effect.
Value-altering effect
- (a) an increase in the reinforcing effectiveness of some stimulus, object, or event, in which the MO is an establishing operation (EO)
- (b) a decrease in reinforcing effectiveness, in which case the MO is an abolishing operation (AO)
Behavior-altering effect
- (a) an increase in the current frequency of behavior that has been reinfoced by some simulus, object, or event, called an evocative effect
- (b) a decrease in the current frequency of behavior that has been reinforced by some stimulus, object, or event, called abative effect
Unconditioned Motivating Operations (UMOs)
Events, operations, and stimulus conditions with value-altering motivating effects that are unlearned. Humas are more affected by food reinforcement, or pain reduction reinforcement. Thus, food deprivation, and painful stimulation are called unconditioned motivating operations (UMOs)
Conditioned Motivating Operations (CMOs)
Motivating variables that alter the reinforcing effectiveness of other stimuli, objects, or events, but only as a result of the organism’s learing history.
As with UMOs, CMOs also alter the momentary frequency of all behavior that has been reinforced (or punished) by those other events.
Depending on their relation to the behavioraly significant event or condition, the three kinds of conditioned motivating operations are classified as surrogate, reflexive, and transitive.
Surrogate (CMO-S)
The CMO-S is a stimulus that acquires its MO effectiveness by being paired with another MO, and has the same value-altering, and bx-altering effect as the MO with which was paired.
The respondent conditioned stimulus (CS), operant conditioned reinforcer (Sr), and operant conditioned punisher (Sp) are each stimuli that acquired a form of behavioral effectiveness by being paired with a behaviorally effective stimulus. It is possible that stimuli that are paired with an UMO will become capable of the same value-altering and behavior-altering effects as that UMO. With respect to its MO characteristics, such as stimulus will be called a surrogate CMO.
Reflexive (CMO-R)
A stimulus that acquires MO effectiveness by preceding some form of worsening or improvement is called a reflexive CMO-R. It is exemplified by the warning stimulus in a typical escape-avoidance procedure, which establishes its own offset as reinforcement and evokes all behavior that has accomplished that offset.
The CMO-R alters a relation to itself (makes its own removal effective as reinforcement.
In more general terms, any stimulus that systematically precedes the onset of painful stimulation becomes a CMO-R, in that its own offset will function as a reinforcer, and its occurence will evoke any behavior that has been followed by such reinforcement.
Example: request for information, which initiates a brief period during which a response must be made to terminate a period of increasing social awkwardness.
Transitive (CMO-T)
An environmental variable that establishes (or abolishes) the reinforcing effectiveness of another stimulus and evokes (or abates) the behavior that has been reinforced by that other stimulus is transitive.
CMO-T makes something else effective as reinforcement (rather than altering itself).
All varibles that function as UMOs also function as transitive CMOs for the stimuli that are condtitioned reinforcers because of their relation to the relevant unconditioned reinforcer.
A CMO-T is a stimulus onset that evokes behavior because of its relation to the value of a consequence rather than to the availability of a consequence.
SDs vs. MOs
An SD controls a type of behavior because it has been related to the differential availability of an effective reinforcer for that type of behavior. This means that the relevant consequence has been available in the presence of, and unavailable in the absence of, the stimulus.
Most variables that qualify as motivating operations fail to meet this second SD requirement because in the absence of the variable, there is no MO for the relevant reinforcer, and thus no reinforcer availability.
SDs are related to the differential availability of a currently effective form of reinforcement for a particular type of behavior; MOs are related to the differential reinforcing effectiveness of a particular type of environmental event.
Stimulus Generalization
When an antecedent stimulus has a history of evoking a response that has been reinforced in its presence, there is a general tendency for similar stimuli to also evoke that response. This evokative function occurs when with stimuli that share similar physicla properties with the controling antecedent stimulus.
Conversly, stimulus discrimination occurs when different stimuli do not evoke the response.
Different degrees of stimulus control produce the defining characteristics of stimulus generalization and discrimination.
Stimulus Generalization Gradient
Graphically depicts the degree of stimulus generalization and discrimination by showing the extent to which responses reinforced in one stimulus condition are emitted in the presence of untrained stimuli. When the slope of the gradient is relatively flat, little stimulus control is evident. However, an increasing slope of the gradient shows more stimulus control.
Stimulus Discrimination Training
The conventional procedure for stimulus discrimination training requires one bx and two antecedents. Responses are reinforced in the presence of one stimulus condition, the SD, but not in the other Sdelta.