Contempt of Court Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What Act legislates for being in contempt of court?

A

Contempt of Court Act 1981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What different types of contempt are there?

A

Strict liability contempt (under Section 1 of CoCA): Publishing material that risks prejudicing a case, if you realised you were doing it or not (court will decide that). Judged purely on basis of what is published.

Common law contempt: publishing material with the intention of prejudicing an active case. This includes whether you did it deliberately or should have seen that it would prejudice a case. Prosecutions under common law are fewer as prosecution would have to prove publication intended to cause risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the Contempt of Court Act 1981 say?

A

“It is illegal to publish material which creates a substantial risk of serious prejudice or impediment to a trial when a case is active”

Contempt is a criminal offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When are cases active in a criminal case?

A

When there is:

  • Arrest with or without a warrant
  • Someone is charged orally
  • Indictment of charges is served
  • Summons has been issued
  • Someone is released on bail
  • Proceedings become active again once an appeal is lodged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When do cases cease to be active?

A
  • Arrested person is released without charge
  • No arrest made within 12 months of a warrant being issued
  • The case is discontinued
  • Defendant is sentenced or acquitted
  • Defendant found to be unfit to stand trial or unfit to plead
  • Court orders the charge to lie on the file

Cases remain active after sentencing but once the verdict is delivered you are safe to publish prejudicial material. Technically possible to be in contempt if you publish something before verdict given, but less likely as judge less likely to be influenced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When are civil cases active and inactive?

A

The case has been set down to trial or the date has been fixed

They are inactive when the case is disposed of, abandoned, discontinued or withdrawn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What about proceedings in an inquest and appeals and re-trials?

A

Proceedings in an inquest are active when an inquest is open.

In appeals and re-trials, when an appeal is launched proceedings become active again. But an appeal in a Court of Appeal is heard by a judge so no risk there, but this changes if there’s a new jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What about other countries?

A

Contempt of Court doesn’t apply if a defendant is arrested in another country and extradited.

But rules are stronger in Scotland - must be aware of cross-border publication.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who implements the Act?

A

Proceedings initiated by a Crown Court or Higher Court or with consent of Attorney General

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What’s the punishment?

A

An unlimited fine or a jail sentence of up to two years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is Contempt of Court Act necessary?

A

Protects the principle of “innocent until proven guilty”

Journalists could publish information that could prejudice an active case by affecting a jury’s decision, witness’s evidence or witness’s intention to come forward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can journalists commit contempt?

A
  • Stating someone committed a crime
  • Anticipating a verdict
  • Publishing someone’s previous criminal convictions
  • Vilifying a suspect as someone likely to have committed a crime i.e. by referring to them as ‘criminal’ ‘murderer’ ‘ robber’ etc.
  • Publishing confidential jury deliberations about a verdict
  • Vilifying a witness at the trial could deter other witnesses from coming forwards
  • Interviewing witnesses before a trial so contaminating their evidence
  • Publishing witness statements
  • Publishing material in breach of a court order
  • Publishing a photo ahead of an ID parade

Court proceedings should generally not be published if a Jury is absent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What can a journalist publish without risking contempt of court?

A

‘Common ground’ details between defence and prosecution:

  • Name
  • Address
  • Age
  • Occupation
  • Facts of the trial or case

Police can appeal to the media for assistance in searching for a wanted person, so publications can publish a photo or description given by the police.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What specific sections of the 1981 Act could journalists be in breach of?

A

Section 8: Publishing jury deliberations (in Scotland and NI only)

Section 9: Bringing tape recorders into court. You could be jailed or fined for doing this. Also bans any recorded material being played publicly as could prejudice witness giving evidence. Criminal Procedure Rules can grant permission for recording but must be ‘reasonable need’

Section 20D of Juries Act 1974: Contempt to publish how a juror voted in a verdict and what was discussed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a Section 11 of the Act?

A

Where courts grant lifelong anonymity for a victim or defendant. This is to:

  • Protect anonymity of victims
  • Protect commercially sensitive information
  • Protect national security

There must be a ‘real and immediate risk’ to grant a Section 11, i.e. that defendant will be attacked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When can Section 11 (anonymity) NOT be used?

A

Can’t be made if the name has already been mentioned at start of hearing or previous hearing. I.e. R v Arundel Justices ex p Westminster Press

Can’t be used to protect the ‘comfort and feelings’ of defendants

17
Q

What is a Section 4(2) postponing order?

A

Where the court orders you to postpone publication because there is going to be a ‘pending or imminent’ trial of that person, or they are part of a wider group that is due to go on trial.

Possibility of a retrial is not covered by this order.

These are common as courts only have to prove there is a ‘substantial’ risk of prejudice instead of ‘serious’

Breaching a Section 4(2) postponing order is punishable as contempt and with an unlimited fine and/or up to two years in jail

18
Q

What is fade factor? (Defence)

A

Theory that media reports are less likely to affect jurors the further away they are from case being heard. Still may not be enough for a publication to avoid liability for contempt.

If a media org finds material relating to a case in archives, they should remove or block public access until case is no longer active.

19
Q

What about readers comments?

A

Best practise is for media organisations to not provide a space for comments under reports of active cases.

Protection is under Regulation 19 of the E-Commerce Regulations 2022.

20
Q

What defences can media organisations put up when found in breach of the Act?

A

Section 3: Not knowing case is active.

Journalists must prove they’ve taken reasonable care to check that a case is active or not. They must keep a clear record of the measures they’ve taken to check whether case was active or not.

Section 4: It’s not contempt to publish:

  • Fair
  • Accurate
  • Contemporaneous reporting of court proceedings held in public
  • Made in good faith
  • Where no Section 4(2) postponing order has been made

Section 5: It’s not contempt to publish material about a case when information is in the public interest, e.g. behaviour of the police or women’s safety. Still, details can’t be published, just relevant themes and issues. The risk of prejudice must be ‘merely incidental to the discussion’ of wider themes and issues.

21
Q

What is a good case study for Contempt of Court Act 1981?

A

Attorney General v MGN Limited and News Group Newspapers Ltd 2011

The High Court fined the Daily Mirror £50,000 and the Sun £18,000 for being in contempt of court for “vilifying” early suspect Christopher Jefferies in killing of Jo Yeates. Jefferies also sued eight papers for libel.

Attorney general said they were engaged in a “feeding frenzy”.

The Sun called Jefferies lewd, creepy and a loner and the Daily Mirror said he had a friend in jail for paedophile crimes.