Contempt & Enforcement Flashcards
What is the standard of review on contempt?
Abuse of discretion. Brooks v. Brooks
When is a contempt order considered an abuse of discretion?
When the order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence.
Can a person be held in contempt of an order that is not clear?
No, in order to be held in contempt of a courts order, the order must be clear and precise and the persons conduct must be in clear violation of the order.
When can trial court hold a party in civil contempt when they violate a court order?
Upon a finding that the party has the present ability to comply with the order and willfully refuses to do so.
Can a person be held in contempt due to nonpayment of a debt NOT involving support?
No.
Are property awards enforceable by contempt.
No. The only available remedies are those of creditor against debtor.
Can a person be held in contempt for failure to sig a quitclaim deed?
Yes, per FL. Fam. L.R.P., 12.570, a court can use their contempt powers to perform an act other than payment of money (i.e, sign title, deed or transfer document).
Are attorney fee orders enforceable by contempt?
Yes. Trial courts may use contempt to enforce orders awarding atty fees even when there are no children and no alimony was awarded.
What are the four types of contempt?
Direct Civil Contempt
Indirect Civil Contempt
Direct Criminal Contempt
Indirect Criminal Contempt
What is the definition of contempt?
A refusal to obey any legal order, mandate, or decree, made or given by any judge relative to any of the business of the court, after due notice thereof, is contempt, punishable accordingly.
What is direct contempt?
A contemptuous at that is committed in the immediate presence of the court.
What is indirect contempt?
An act committed outside the presence of the court.
What is the main difference between civil and criminal contempt?
Civil contempt is remedial whereas criminal contempt is punitive.
is criminal contempt available in a civil matter.
Yes.
What is criminal contempt?
Criminal contempt involved conduct that is calculated to embarrass, hinder, or obstruct the administration of justice and is used to vindicate authority of the court and to punish the offending participant.