Contemporary Aboriginal Spiritualities Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Dreaming

A

the spiritual aspect of Aboriginal religion that encapsulates both the spiritual and physical dimensions giving meaning to all aspects of life

Background

  • Links to Spirit Ancestors, totems, law and oral teachings
  • Fundamental tenet that underpins the whole of the Aboriginal Belief System – life, creation, land and Identity
  • Meta-temporal Concept: transcends time. Incorporates past, present and the future reality as a complete and present reality.
  • Inextricably connected to the land
  • Embedded in all aspects of life
  • Refers to the way that ancestor spirits came from,
  • Shaped and formed and returned to the land.
  • Informs and is informed by kinship, ceremonial life
  • obligation to land and peoples
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aboriginal Spirituality

A

(living religion) whole of creation is linked together and every action or event of social significance has a spiritual significance – the religion is holistic; there is a correlation between the created world, social world and spiritual world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How Aboriginal spirituality is determined by the dreaming

A

Aboriginal Spirituality is determined and characterised by the dreaming through importance of kinship, ceremonial life and obligations to the land and people.

  • kinship
  • ceremonial life
  • obligations to the land and people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Kinship

A

Is a term used by non-indigenous Australians to explain the complex relationships of blood and spirit that exist between Aboriginal peoples; a highly sophisticated network of relationships governing interactions between members of the clan. It also directly relates to kanyini.

  • Kinship provides a framework for living which is defined by the Dreaming. Outlining obligations, rights, appropriate forms of behaviour, marriage and family (children raised by a variety of individuals).
  • Extends to land and governs dancing, ceremonies, hunting
  • Determines tribe and family relationships, creating a connection with the land ancestor spirits and the dreaming
  • Every person belongs to a specific kinship relationship based on a system of ‘classes’ or ‘skins’ & this determines responsibilities within the group according to Aboriginal Law.
  • Is determined by both family relationships and a person’s totem and is thus a connection with the ancestor spirits, land and dreaming – metaphysical connection.

“Kinship is the completeness of the oneness” (kanyini) – Bob Randall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kinship systems

A
  • defines where a person fits into a community, varying across communities (for an Aboriginal person to function fully within their society they must have knowledge of their relationship to the clan & their position within it)
  • (relationships interlink & overlap & every person is bound to every other person)
  • Roles for raising & educating children + provides systems of moral & financial support within communities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Extended family/kinship

A
  • As many young Indigenous Australians seek to recover the traditions which have been discouraged by the dominant attitudes and policies of Australian culture, one of the things they are seeking to recover and relearn is their kinship system.
  • Family roles are not necessarily determined by biological relationships and vary between regions e.g. A biological ‘cousin’ may be referred to as ‘brother’ or ‘sister’.
  • Understanding family roles is essential when identifying an appropriate next of kin – this may not be a spouse or immediate family member, but alternatively, an extended family member or community elder.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Kanyini

A

Kanyini is nurtured through caring and practicing responsibility for all things and describes the connectedness to our tjukurrpa our ngura our walytja and our kurunpa
- extends to land, dancing, ceremonies, hunting parties and raising children (crucial elements to dreaming), also governs totems, unifying clans under ancestral beings, creating a metaphysical connection of Dreaming Kinship.

Kanyini is the principle of connectedness through caring and responsibility that underpins Aboriginal life,”
- Bob Randall.
4 concepts of Kanyini
1. tjukurrpa = knowledge of creation or ‘Dreaming’
2. ngura = place – wherever we are at any moment of time, with a responsibility to care for that place
3. walytja = kinship – not just blood family, but the ceremonial and totemic family line
4. kurunpa = spirit or soul – only we are responsible for our soul, which is affected by thoughts and actions

these concepts are predominantly influenced by tjukurrpa;
‘the bigger consciousness of something that was and is the way to live, the way to live in harmony with all things.” – Bob Randall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ceremonial life

A

The ritual and artistic expression of the Dreaming concerning;

  1. rites of passage = informs different individual status e.g. initiations and funerals
  2. passing on social information = transferred from older to younger generations
  3. personal connections = supports personal friendships or group activities
  4. spiritual connections = connect individuals with the spiritual world or dreaming
  • A ceremony is an activity infused with ritual significance, performed on a special occasion and a ritual is any customary observance or practice.
  • Most ceremonies practised in Aboriginal communities cannot be discussed fully due to their sensitive and sacred nature; Inherited through kinship and community groups
  • Acts as the link between people, land and identity
  • All ceremonies have a firm place with the Dreaming. They ensure that vital components of Aboriginal law and the Dreaming stay intact.
  • Examples include: birth, male initiation, female initiation, death and balance.
  • It is through there ceremonial life that they are able to better this connection to the land and identity
  • represent the present part of the Metatemporal concept
  • passing on and maintaining beliefs and practices
  • acknowledge a creation event and show the metaphysical presence of the dreaming world in the real world
  • Ceremonies tell Dreaming Stories that provide continuity between present and the Dreaming.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Obligations to the land and people

A
  1. Land and people cannot be separated because of the inextricable connection – the land is seen as the physical medium through which the dreaming is carried out – resting place for ancestors
  2. rituals are connected to sacred sites – called balance rites
  3. land is the meeting point – where tribes derive identity and their relationships
  • Land is of crucial importance to the Dreaming
  • Dwelling place for Ancestral Beings
  • The Aboriginal People are responsible for Sacred Sites and Ritual Estate on their land.
  • Totems link to land, plants, animals and land forms.
  • Aboriginal people are custodians of the land.
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have such an inseparable and timeless connection with land and that they often regard the Land as mother.
  • Due respect is shown in use care and management of the land. e.g. Sustainable practices Formal protocols of entry and crossing land exist. Welcome to country. Fulfils obligation to the land and the peoples by addressing the original custodians and the ancestors past and present.

Because of the LAND being so crucial, the obligations to the land and people are also crucial, they can:

  • Only be truly understood by those “elders” with full knowledge of the Dreaming
  • Vary according to place
  • Vary according to gender and place in the community

Therefore country is the geographical and spiritual place where kinship connections are established and ceremonial life is enacted by different individuals and groups according to their obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Effect of dispossession

A

Dispossession = where one is ‘physically or spiritually homeless or deprived of security’

BACKGROUND
Gain “the consent of the natives” was the instruction given to Captain Cook before he took possession of the land on behalf of Great Britain
- Capt Cook made several attempts to land on Australian shores and was repeatedly repelled by Australian aboriginals – Aboriginal warrior Pemulway led armed resistance against the colonizers.
- Claimed the “new land” for the crown and used the social construct of Terra nullius, dispossessing Aboriginal people of their lands without any compensation.
- The notion of Terra nullius meaning the ‘land belongs to no one’; no-one has legal ownership.
- The terra nullius construct was declared fiction and void by the Australian High Court in 1992.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Separation from the land

A
  • Major factor in separating Aboriginal people from their culture and religion and severed link with land
  • This was in fact one of the stated aims of early 20th century policies of separation. It was hoped that: Culture, Language, Law, identity of Aboriginal people would be destroyed as the people were moved to reserves & missions
  • In some language groups, separation from land has destroyed traditional structures of ownership, management & inheritance (it is important for Aboriginals to have knowledge of their ‘country’ – the law, culture & traditions associated with it)
  • Separation therefore = destruction of traditional spirituality.
  • Aboriginal people define themselves by their connection to their country or land. Therefore loss of land = loss of identity and personhood
  • Taking of the land = Europeans destroyed the most meaningful base of Aboriginal life.
  • Because of the enforced values of Europeans, traditional values and attitudes of indigenous people shifted e.g. They took Indigenous young men, weakening value of elders.
  • Fences & boundaries were put up. This was a foreign concept for the natives. In order to remove traditional land, Europeans started up reserves & missions.
  • Land is inextricably connected to kinship, relationships, ceremonial life, family connections, totemic responsibilities
  • 1788 settlement and establishment of Terra Nullius lead to; no recognition of Aboriginal land ownership and marked the start of the removal of tribes from Dreaming stories/totems found in the land.
  • 1820/1850: governments and churches established missions and reserves to impose Christianity, European culture and lifestyle – lead to loss of culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Separation from kinship groups

A
  • Lost opportunity to express their religion in traditional song, dances and rituals
  • Separation made it impossible for Aboriginals to preserve their own language - Important words & concepts relating to Aboriginal spirituality were lost, along with ways of learning within the group and ways of exercising responsibilities.
  • The sense of ‘not belonging’ has been a major consequence of separation.
  • In many cases, information that could be used to establish family links has been lost or destroyed. This makes it difficult for Aboriginal people to connect with their kinship heritage and participate in Native Title claims.
  • In Aboriginal communities, the responsibility for raising & nurturing children and continuing tradition (as with all other social obligations) was shared within the kinship group – this was severed by dispossession.
  • Since family and sacred roles were intertwined, the undermining of Aboriginal parenting has contributed to the continuing breakdown of Aboriginal spirituality and years of custom/culture.
  • 1838: policy of protection placed Aboriginal people on missions and reserves - forced placement on mass, in a deliberate attempt to destroy spirituality, destroying kinship, gender roles, culture and language
  • 1901: Policy of assimilation removed mixed Aboriginal people from kinship groups – detrimental to all-encompassing nature of spirituality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stolen generation

A
  • From the late 1800s to the 1970s, forced separation pf Aboriginal children was Government policy
  • As many as 100,000 children were removed, in a deliberate attempt to remove their Aboriginal identity
  • Bringing them home report revealed the loss of; heritage, culture, language, land and community - the report made 54 recommendations to government, church groups and other community groups e.g. 7A = National sorry day to be held.
  • ABS revealed aboriginal life expectancy is 20% below national average, caused by separation from land, kinship groups and family.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Overview of things taken from Indigenous people

A
  • Loss of language, land and culture (spirituality)
  • Loss of identity (violation of kinship ties)
  • Unable to connect to ancestral beings; loss of spirituality + no one to perform rituals (i.e ‘rituals of estate – land)
  • Loss of kin, which can lead to lower self-esteem and/or self-worth; as they have no rights, role or responsibility to others.
  • The dreaming cannot be taught, it is something that is felt and experienced by, being in one’s own country and being surrounded by ones kin.
  • Trauma from being forcibly removed from their lives; may result in mental illnesses and/or substance abuse
  • “cultural genocide” & “rape of the soul”
  • Statistics show that without their spiritual connection, Aboriginal people are in a state of apathy & despair
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Policies in regards to indigenous peoples PAIS

A

protectionism (segregation)

  • Aboriginals were not dying out so the thought was the need to ‘protect’. This deliberately set Aboriginals physically apart from white settlement.
  • People were forcibly removed to missions (church) and reserves (gov). Authorities treated them as if they were children (paternalistic).
  • Changed names and decoded who could marry who. Controlled employment and wages. Were not permitted to leave; if caught severely punished.
  • Deliberate attempt to destroy spirituality and religious links to land.
  • Aboriginal Protection Act passed by NSW in 1909 gave greater powers over Aboriginals.

assimilation

  • protection paved the way for assimilation. The economic burden of protection was ever increasing.
  • After Federation the gov completely reversed its position on Aboriginals again and moved to develop assimilation policies.
  • Assimilation didn’t recognise Aboriginals as the continent’s Indigenous people bearing inherent rights. The policy theoretically worked towards the goal of ‘one nation’ whereby all nationalities and races in Australia would see themselves as one people.
  • Under this policy children were taken from their homes.
  • Although no longer the official policy of Aust gov it is still the ‘official attitude’.

integration

  • Assimilation had failed, with many Aboriginal people failing to assimilate into society and adopt Australian ways. Instead they remained on the fringes of society whilst living in a segregated world.
  • Integration involved combining Aboriginal and Aust culture into one seamless culture. Whilst Aboriginals still had to adopt Australian ways, Aust in general were supposed to be more tolerant of their habits.

self-determination

  • with racism still rife in society integration failed. Gov and society were tired of trying attempting to make Aboriginals like white society; instead they let Aboriginals start to make their own choices, within the constraints of Aust law.
  • In this Aboriginals are supposed to be able to determined and control their own business. This led to the formation of several gov agencies for Aboriginal self-determination including the National Aboriginal Council, the ATSI Commission and Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Land Rights Movement

A

Land Rights Movement = a religious-political movement that seeks to secure the inherent rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples to their land, and to ensure that their religious, spiritual and cultural integrity is preserved (connection to the Dreaming). To reclaim land means, for Aboriginal people, to reconnect with their cultures and with their Dreaming stories (if these stories have not been already completely lost).

  • In 1976 the Fraser Government passed a law that gave Aboriginal people some land rights - Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976
  • This did not mean that Aboriginals actually got (all) their land
  • The Law did not include States - only Territories
  • The Act - the first of the Aboriginal Land Rights Acts, and was significant in that it allowed a claim of title if claimants could provide evidence of their traditional association with land.
  • Native Title - is the recognition that Aboriginal people who occupy land on which their families have lived continuously for hundreds of years are the owners of that land.
17
Q

Importance of Land rights movement to Aboriginal spirituality

A
  • It is central to their spiritual life e.g. it is the source of the Dreaming, it is the resting place of spirit ancestors
  • It is central to their cultural life e.g. tribal boundaries are define by the land, ritual actions have source in the land
  • It is the basis of their economic life e.g. source of food/ water (hunting)
  • Control over land is a means of regaining control over their lives (i.e. allows for the economic and spiritual dimension of their lives)
  • Land rights of critical importance in relation to Aboriginal spirituality, because Dreaming is inextricably connected to the land and ancestral beings.
  • Each person is connected to their land through their totem – with them requiring a connection with the land to fulfill totemic responsibilities.
  • Specific areas have important spiritual meaning for groups of Aboriginal people – known as sacred sites

“I want to acknowledge that we Australians have still much to do to redress the injustice and oppression that has for so long been the loss of Black Australians…. And I want to give back to you formally in Aboriginal and Australian Law ownership of this land of your fathers.” Whitlam, 1975

18
Q

Importance on the land rights movement

A
  • native title
  • mabo
  • Wik
19
Q

land right movement - mabo

A
  • Eddie Mabo (29 June 1936 – 21 January 1992) was an Indigenous man from the Torres Strait Islands known for his role in campaigning for Indigenous rights and for his role in a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia which overturned the legal doctrine of Terra Nullius (‘land belonging to no one’) which characterised Australian law with regard to land and title
  • Initially in the supreme court, the decision was ruled in favour of the Queensland government – which was later appealed to the High Court reversing the decision - Mabo won the land rights claim on behalf of the Murray Island people.
  • Mabo & Others v Queensland (No. 2) (1992) ruled in favour of an action brought by Eddie Mabo on behalf of the Murray Island people.
  • The High Court held that: ‘Native Title’ is defined according to the traditional laws & customs of people having relating with the Land.
  • It was more of a symbolic than realistic benefit – there were restrictions:
    – only limited amounts of land which they could claim under this If land was owned under a freehold title, native title was invalid
    – Had to prove that there was a continuous traditional link with the land since 1788
    – This was often difficult to prove this as British colonisation removed ATSI people from their land
20
Q

summary of mabo case

A
  • This landmark case finally recognised that Native Title did exist in Australia and that Indigenous people still had the right to make claims over their traditional lands.
  • The Mabo case stimulated both increased awareness and support for Indigenous rights, and a backlash of fear as Australians began to consider what the case may mean.
  • The government chose to respond by establishing a national Native Title Act 1993.
  • While many saw the Native Title Act as a positive move forward, as it established a way for Indigenous people to make land rights claims without going to court, the Native Title Act was very controversial and many amendments were made before conservative politicians would pass it into law.
21
Q

Land right movement - native title

A

Native Title = “Rights and interests in relation to land and water” – gave them the right to fish, hunt and practice ceremonies. It can’t be claimed over private property or areas with public building – has to be claimed with proof of occupation prior to settlement.

  • Passed down in the High Court of Australia as a result of Mabo 1992 – Indigenous property rights
  • 1991: High court – Meridian people continued to have traditional right to possess and live on most lands of Mer;
    Outcomes: set a precedent for land rights, rejected terra nullius, says that native Title exists where continuous connection to the land has been maintained.
  • Native Title Act 1993: Native title is the traditional rights and interests of indigenous people, however this can’t prevail over freehold title (farmers).
  • Since the 1950s the struggle for justice has been heavily focused on land rights. 1992 Mabo – High Court ruled that in certain circumstances a form of title named ‘Native Title’ existed under Australian law.
22
Q

rights from native title

A

Many native title claims are for shared rights to the land with other people who also have an interest in the land.
Recognition of native title may give Indigenous people the right to hold ceremony, gather bush tucker or have a say on what development can happen on the land. Examples of native title rights:
 The right to protect sites and access or hunt
 In some cases, the right to camp or live on the land and share in money made from development of the land;
 The right to hold ceremony; and,
 The right to have a say on the management or development of the land.
Native title DOES NOT give you:
- Ownership of the land as recognised by white fellas;
- The power to take away other people’s rights to the land, like a pastoralist or a company with a mining licence; or, The right to stop developments.
PASTORLISTS ISSUE
- The Australian economy depends on mining and cattle-raising.
- This is all done on Aboriginal land
- The problem of Aboriginal ownership, mining and cattle-raising remained.
- The question was: Can mining and pastoral activity co-exist on Aboriginal land?

23
Q

importance of land rights movement - wik case

A
  • In 1996 the High Court decided that pastoral leases did not extinguish native title
  • The decision established the principle of co-existence
  • Aboriginal people could own their land and negotiate with commercial companies to use that land for the payment of a rent.

The Wik Peoples vs. The State of Queensland (1996) established that pastoral leases did not automatically extinguish native title and that:

  • They could co‐exist when interests were in conflict, however, the rights of the leasehold title would prevail
  • It was extremely significant as there was a great increase in potential for Native Title Claims
  • Over 42% of Australia is held under pastoral leases - It later led to the Howard government introducing the Native Title amendment act and the 10 point plan.

NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT ACT (1998) + 10-POINT PLAN

  • It was introduced with other claims the Wik decision had left too much uncertainty & threatened investment from mining companies.
  • In 1998 Howard Government amended the Native Title act in response to pressure from Rural investors. This is referred to as the ten point plan.
  • This meant that leasehold title could be upgraded to transfer to freehold title thus making Native Title more difficult to obtain.
  • Sunset clause in ten point plan set a cutoff date for Native Title claims effectively making it impossible for many rightful claimants to negate their claim.
  • WIk people argued that
  • 1996: High court: Native Title could co-exist with pastoral leases, however the Pastoralists’ rights prevail
  • 1998: Native Title amendment Act: removed the right to negotiate for government owned land
  • Native land contains bauxite deposit – causing high numbers of mining
  • People spent 4 years talking to bankers, industry advisors – signed an IlUA
  • Traditional owners of the land receive a 15% share, 2 seats on the board
  • Seat at the negotiating table
  • In 1996 the High Court ruled in favour of the Wik people who claimed that leasehold title may not automatically extinguish native title.
  • Outcome: they can coexist with lease holders, leading to the development of the amendment act
24
Q

importance of dreaming for land rights movement

A
  • Defines the connection to the land
  • Confers on each person the responsibility to care for the land
  • Land is the resting place of the ancestor spirits – creates sacred sites
  • The identity of every person is linked to the land through the dreaming
  • Provides stories of creation by ancestor spirits
  • The land is home to ancestor beings
  • Aboriginal Spirituality is founded on the principle that Indigenous people have an inextricable connection to the land – they are part of the land and the land is part of their being
  • Their Ancestor Spirits gave them rights, obligations and responsibilities – to care for the land and use it in the expression of their spirituality
  • Sacred places are critical for the ceremonial life
  • That land is home to – and provides the origin of – totems, sacred objects and the Ancestor Spirits
  • The declaration of Terra Nullius deprived the Aboriginal people of these principles
  • Mabo, Wik and the Native Title Act clarified the Government’s position in regard to land claims and – to some extent – restored the rights of Aboriginal People who had maintained continual contact with their land
  • The Dreaming defines the connection between the Aboriginal People and the land
  • The Aborignal people had occupied the land continuously for 40,000 years
  • All aspects of Aboriginal life are rooted in the Dreaming stories – the Ancestor Beings
  • So without the land, the Dreaming could not be communicated because the stories of the ancestor spirits spring from the land
  • Thus the land lies at the heart of Aboriginal Spirituality
  • The identity of every Aboriginal person is inextricably linked to the land
  • It follows then that their belief systems, rituals, traditions and laws are connected to the land
  • The Aboriginal People have ritual responsibilities to take care of the land because it is the resting place for the ancestor spirits
  • This gives rise to the existence of Sacred Sites
  • The land is home to the totems
  • It is the understanding – and the acceptance – of the sacred nature of the land that underpins all aspects of the Land Rights Movement
  • Thus the Dreaming provided the motivation behind the Land Rights Movement
25
Q

background to motion of apology to australia’s indigenous peoples

A
  • Wednesday 13 February 2008 was an historic day for all Australians when the Prime Minister, the Hon Kevin Rudd MP, introduced the Motion of Apology to Australia’s Indigenous Peoples in Parliament.
  • The apology, a recommendation of the Bringing Them Home report, was made on behalf of the Australian Parliament to all Indigenous Peoples for the policies of past governments, including those policies which forcibly separated Indigenous children from their families and communities.
  • The 1997 report, titled “Bringing Them Home”, highlighted that many children experienced physical, sexual and psychological abuse, were poorly educated, received inadequate clothing and food and were sent to work for less than the minimum wage, if they were paid at all.
  • ‘Sorry Day’ was also a recommendation of the Bringing Them Home report and has been marked by communities each year on 26 May since 1998 to commemorate the history of forcible removal of children and its effects.