Constructivist Models: Narrative, Collaborative Language-Based Systems, Multicultural Family Therapy Flashcards
Modernism vs. Postmodernism
Prior to 1980s: Modernism
Absolute Truths/Universals; families operate according to implicit
laws of interaction
Interest in cognitive sciences
Therapist was a technical expert who could diagnose and repair
family systems
1980s: Postmodernism
Reality is socially constructed; meaning emerges from interactions
between people
Interest in semiotics, hermeneutics, narrative, and linguistics
Science is a product of one’s perspective, as well as of dominant
discourses in culture
Postmodern Views
“Where a society says, ‘that’s just the way it is,’ there is mythology” –
Joseph Campbell
Constructivism: the idea that “human experience is fundamentally
ambiguous.”
Meanings are assigned – e.g. “chair,” “love”
Challenges essentialism (things are the way they are because that’s
natural) and authoritarianism
Social constructionism: taking constructivism one step further,
looking at the cultural influences on how we construct reality
All beliefs have origins, even those assumed to be laws of nature –
e.g. “killing people is wrong”
New constructions may lead to new ways of being
Neither therapist nor client has a corner on the truth – their
identities influence their truths
Social Constructionism
Lynn Hoffman
The observer cannot be separated from the thing being observed,
so it is not possible to be completely objective
The “self” is socially constructed
No standards for normal development
Emotions are not an internal state, but are determined by context
Product of language or discourse
Communication has no underlying, consensual meaning, but is
subjective
Therapists participate in the construction of reality for our clients
and are not experts
- Focus attention to language and meaning
- Therapy and outcome is jointly constructed
Reject the systemic view of families
- No inherent patterns of communication
5 Main Constructivist Models
Inventive Questioning (Tomm)
Reflecting Team (T. Anderson)
Collaborative Language Systems (Anderson and Goolishan)
Solution-Focused Therapy (de Shazer and Berg)
Narrative Therapy (White and Epston)
Inventive Questioning
Karl Tomm
Psychiatrist in Calgary, Canada
Principal translator for Milan model in North America
Influenced by Milan group
Hypothesizing
Circularity
Neutrality
Strategizing
Construct questions not to just gather info but to induce change in
system as well
Reflexive Questions
Reflexive Questions
Future-oriented questions
- To stimulate new options for the future
Observer-perspective questions
- To stimulate self-observations
Unexpected counterchange questions
- To alter the context in which the problem behavior is viewed
- To open up choices not yet considered
Embedded suggestion questions
- To allow the therapist to point to new possibilities
Normative-comparison questions
- Normalize circumstance by comparing to other people in similar
circumstances
Distinction-clarifying questions
- To separate the components of a problem
Questions introducing hypotheses
- To offer tentative hypotheses about the meaning of the problem
Process-interrupting questions
- To create sudden shift in the therapeutic session
Feminist Family Therapy
Challenge traditional family roles by questioning gender roles and
their stereotyping and how these have affected the family
No separate model
Motivated by active concern with justice and desire to contribute to
overcoming of women’s subordinations
Focus on gender norms as “embedded in language, culture, and
experience, and [are] thus subtly communicated and internalize
from the moment of birth”
Pathology of female experience
Faults other models for favoring masculine values and assuming
equal-power and control
Therapy should be egalitarian
May use unbalancing to align with females when power differential
is present in session
Collaborative Language Systems
Harlene Anderson and Harry Goolishan (1960s)
Multiple Impact Therapy
Influenced by post-Milan group that challenged cybernetic
approaches
Houston-Galveston Institute
- Training center for family therapy
Other contributors: Lynne Hoffman, Tom Anderson, Ken Gergen,
Sheila McNamee, John Shotter
Assumptions
Person’s reality/knowledge is socially constructed and maintained
through dialogue, which emerges as a narrative reality
Each session is unique and therapist has no preconceived notion of
how things should be
- “Not knowing” position: non-expert position
- Helps clients to become experts in own lives
- Takes state of “being informed” by the client
Transparency on part of therapist
- Role = co-explorer, offers perspectives, not an answer or solution
Frequency, duration, and termination of sessions are determined
and negotiated on a session-by-session basis with input from all
members of the family and therapy team
Normal development and dysfunction in Social Constructionism means…
Meaning is created through language and social discourse
Problems and solutions are also socially constructed
- Not fixed, concrete entities
- Something that someone is worried about and wants to change
Problems develop a “problem-determined system”
- Made up of people who wish to talk about the problem (e.g. family
members, teachers, members of agencies, etc)
- Therapist is not separate from the problem system
“Problems are stories that people have agreed to tell themselves”
Goals of Social Constructionism
Dissolution of the problem system as a result of “evolution of new
meaning through the narratives and stories created in the
therapeutic conversation and dialogue”
- Once problem is “dissolved”, so are the systems around which it
was organized
Client-therapist conversation
- Collaborative
- Mutual search and exploration through dialogue in which
meanings are continually evolving
- Linguistic process of co-creating stories
Solution Focused Therapy
(SFT)
Steve de Shazer and Insoo Berg
Brief Family Therapy Center (Milwaukee, WI)
Late 1970s
MRI Influence (de Shazer)
Dedicated to brief treatment
Adhere to minimal intervention
Do not emphasize underlying pathology or family history
Focus attention away from problems and help identify and repeat
behaviors that have previously been helpful
Solutions develop by emphasizing previous successes while
deemphasizing the problem
Normal development and dysfunction in SFT means…
No “normative’ model
No single “right way” to live and act
Thus, no need to analyze conceptual ideas of patterns, structures
Difficulties exist when people engage in problem-focused thinking
rather than their own competencies to solve problems
Stance of the SFT therapist
Work collaboratively with clients to negotiate achievable goals
Believe that clients have the ability to solve their own problems with
only slight shifts in how they behave or view problems
Ability to convey hope and understanding through use of solution
focused language
Can be helpful to first validate previous difficulties and experience
of the problem
Highlight exceptions to the problems and design interventions to
amplify non-problematic patterns
SFT Assumptions
Small changes in ways families view themselves and abilities to
solve problems will result in significant improvement in ability to
reach goals
No need to attend to hypothetical underlying causes