Construction Administration Flashcards
What are the general responsibilities of the architect during construction for CM as Advisor?
Same as with Design-Bid-Build, except:
- Both architect and CM provide CA services:
- both can require testing/inspector or reject work
- both review submittals
- the CM only prepares Change Orders and Directive, but they still must be signed by the architect (as well as owner and contractor)
- The architect reports the findings of site visits to the CM. The CM also shares their site findings with the architect
- Communication between owner and contractor go through the CM, not the architect, but the architect is copied on all messages
- The CM receives RFIs and forwards them to the architect w/ recommendation
- The architect remains the Initial Decision-Maker on claims between the owner and the contractor
What are the general responsibilities of the architect during construction for CM as Constructor?
Almost all aspects are the same as with Design-Bid-Build, except:
- The architect must both advise and consult with CM in addition to with the owner
- The architect’s CA responsibilities start when the owner accepts the CM’s GMP, Control Estimate, or with the owner’s Notice to Proceed
- The CM still submits Application for Payment to the architect, but there is a more complex method for calculating the progress payment
What are the general responsibilities of the architect during construction for Design-Build?
The architects responsibilities are defined in the agreement between constructor and owner. The architect may have all, few, or no CA responsibilities. All CA responsibilities are for only the architect’s portion of the work.
If selected, these responsibilities may include:
- Full administration of the contract between the constructor and any sub-contractors (EG request for payment, approve/reject work, receive and forward legal/financial/insurance documents)
- Review RFI and submittals
- Make site visits on behalf of the constructor in order to help protect them from defects and determine conformance with the Contract Documents
- Prepare/review proposed Change Orders
- Require testing/inspections
- When employed by the constructor (“design-builder”), perform any CA responsiblities that are contractually assigned to the constructor, which the architect may be asked to perform on their behalf
What are the general responsibilities of the architect during construction for Integrated Project Deivery?
Once construction as begun, all responsibilities are essentially the same as with Design-Bid-Build.
What are the cases where work must be uncovered? Who is responsible for the cost in each case?
Firstly:
If the architect has made a prior request to view work OR the contract requires work to be uncovered until inspected, but that work has already been covered.
In this case, the contractor is responsible for the cost of uncovering and replacing the any work.
Secondly:
When the architect or owner requests that work be uncovered.
In this case:
- The owner is responsile for the cost of uncovering and replacing any work if the what is uncovered is found to be in compliance with the Contract Documents
- The contract is responsible for the cost if the work is found to be not in conformance, unless the non-conformance has been caused by the owner or a separate contractor
What are the architect’s responsibilities with respect to safety?
The architect has no obligation to ensure and advise on safety with respect to the contstruction.
If the architect observes clearly unsafe conditions, they should notify the contractor immediately verbally and in writing.
The achitect should never provide any advice, comment, or evaluation on how to provide safety. If they do so, they become legally responsible for the outcome of their suggestion.
What are the division of responsibilities for tests/inspections? Who pays for tests/inspections?
- The contractor is responsible for making arrangements for inspections to occur and informing the architect of times, ETC.
- The contractor initially pays for all tests/inspections
- If tests or inspections are required (by owner, architect, or AHJ) beyond what was originally stated in the Contract Documents, or if they are Special Inspections required by IBC, then the owner must pay/reimburse the contractor for them.
- No matter who pays for the tests/inspections, the contractor is allways responsible for the cost to correct any times, including additional tests/inspections of that work
What additional responsibilities does the architect have for sustainable projects?
Within the sustainability goals defined in the agreement or the Contract Documents:
- Along with other progress reports, ETC, also advise on the progress of achieving sustainability goals.
- As part of any inspection for and notification of deviation from the Contract Documents, also do the same for the sustainability goals.
- The architect registers the project with any authority that certifies sustainability
- Collect any sustainability documentation, format/maintain it, and submit to any certifying authority, as well as appealling any ruling by that authority, but only if made while the contract is still active
What are the general aspects of the ways the project schedule can be accelerated?
Three types of acceleration:
- Directed Acceleration: The owner elects to accelerate the schedule and pays the agreed additional price for this
- Voluntary Acceleration: The contractor elects to accelerate the schedule (such as if they have fallen behind schedule or they want to finish early for personnel or financial reasons)
- Constructive Acceleration: The project has been delayed by an unavoidable sitaution (weather, deliveries, Change Orders, ETC) but choses not to negotiate an extension of the schedule.
If an extension of the schedule is warranted (such as with Constructive Acceleration), but for whatever reason the contractor is not given an extension, then they must meet the project deadline but may claim damages from the owner for the additional cost of accelerating the schedule.
What are the general aspects of changes to the Construction Documents made before the contract is awarded vs after?
Before Contract is Awarded:
Changes are issued through “Addenda” and are included in the contractors bid amount.
After Contract is Awarded:
Changes come in the form of:
- “Minor Change to the Work”
- Construction Change Directive
- Change Order
Changes at this point may have cost or schedule implications that modify the contract price or milestones.
What are the general aspects of the three types of construction changes?
- *Minor Change in the Work**
- A low-consequence change that does not require a change in the contract sum or schedule
- The architect may issue an order for this change without approval from the owner or the contractor
- May use AIA form G710 “Architect’s Supplemental Instructions”
- *Construction Change Directive**
- A change that has an impact on contract sum and/or schedule
- Issued when the change must be made immediately but the owner and contractor have not yet agreed upon a price and schedule change.
- The architect prepares the Directive with the owner’s approval; the contractor does not have to approve
- May use AIA form G714 “Construction Change Directive”
- *Change Order**
- A change that has an impact on contract sum and/or schedule
- Include a description of the change to the work (including drawings) and the amount of change to the contract sum and/or schedule
- Any party may propose a change order, but they are typically prepared by the architect and sent to the owner
- The architect, owner, and contract must all approve and sign the change order
What is the typical process of a Construction Change Directive?
- The architect prepares the CCD. It includes:
- a description of the change to the work (text and drawings)
- a proposed basis for adjusting the contract sum
- The basis for adjusting the contract sum may be a mutually agreed lump sum, based on unit prices agreed upon in the original contract, or some other method described in the CCD
- The architect sends the CCD to the contractor, who must immediately proceed with the work as described
- The contractor must adives the architect and owner of their agreement or disagreement with the proposed basis for adjusting the contract sum. If the contractor agrees, it is recorded as a Change Order
- If the contractor disagrees, the architect proposes an adjustment to the contract sum based on an evaluation of the materials, labor, other costs, and profit. The contrator may propose this. Ultimately, the owner and contractor must negotiate and agree on this amount.
- If in the meantime the contractor submits an Application for Payment that includes payment for the change in the work, the architect must make a determination whether it is justified, with the owners approval.
- If such an additional amount in an Application for Payment is approved, it becomes an adjustment to the contract sum.
What are the general aspects of Submittals?
- They do not become part of the Contract Documents, even if approved
- The architect is not responsible for reviewing for:
- Accuracy of field measurements
- Verifying quantities
- Approving fabrication or installation procedures
- The General Conditions of the Contract usually requires the contractor to submit a Submittal schedule to the architect for approval at the beginning of the project. This schedule should include reasonable time for the architect’s receipt and review, including any time and proceedures given in the Specifications
- Submittals may be sent for informational purposes only, if they do not require the architect’s approval (such items that are for record purposes only).
In reviewing Applications for Payment, what are the general aspects of “acceptable storage”?
- Materials purchased by the contractor but not yet part of the work, which are stored in an acceptable way
- Usually means stored on-site, but if agreed before-hand in writing, can be stored elsewhere
- Materials not in acceptable storage may not be included on the Application for Payment, even if they have already been purchased and received by the contractor
What is and is not included in the architect’s review of an Application for Payment?
Included:
- Reasonable belief that the work and materials on the Application have been completed/received
- Reasonable belief that the work completed is to the necessary quality and conformance with the Contract Documents
Not Included:
- Exhuastive inspections and verifications
- Review of methods and practices
- Review of requisitions, receipts, invoices, ETC to the contractor
- Determination of how the money previous paid to the contractor was used (IE, that the contractor has actually paid vendors or sub-contractors)