Constitutional Law Flashcards

1
Q

Organizational Standing

A

Organizations can assert standing when (1) their members have standing, (2) when the injury or interests at stake are germane to the organization’s purpose, and (3) when individual members are not necessary to adjudicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Procedural Due Process (Intro)

A

The 14th amendment prohibits states from depriving persons of “life, liberty, or property” without due process.

In assessing whether a procedural due process (PDP) violation exists, courts will first determine if there has been a deprivation of a fundamental right to life, liberty, or property. If there is such a deprivation, courts will then determine the amount of due process required for such a deprivation and whether sufficient due process was afforded. In general, due process requires a pre-termination notice and a hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PDP - Public Employment

A

Public employment may constitute a property interest in some cases.

In general, the Supreme Court has held that employees possess a property interest in continued employment if there is an employment contract providing as such, or if they can only be fired for-cause.

In contrast, at-will employees have no right to continued employment unless (a) they have been given assurances of continued employment, (b) their employment contract limits the grounds of their termination, or if (c) the grounds for their termination are constitutionally impermissible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PDP format

A

(1) Discuss whether there was a legitimate property or liberty interest (i.e. wages, continued employment, first amendment or other liberty rights)

(2) Discuss whether that interest was deprived by the state

(3) What due process should be afforded

(4) What due process was afforded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

First Amendment Rights of Government Employees

A

At-will government employees cannot be fired for having engaged in speech protected by the First Amendment.

In general, government employees may avail of first amendment free speech protections when speaking as a private citizen on matters of public concerns. When speaking pursuant to official duties, however, public employees may not avail of First Amendment protections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PDP - What process is due

A

PDP generally requires the imposition of certain procedural safeguards, including The Supreme Court has delineated a 3-pt. balancing test to determine what due process should be afforded upon a deprivation of life, liberty, or property. Courts generally look at (1) the private interest at stake, (2) the government’s interest, and (3) the risk of erroneous deprivation with current procedural safeguards, and the burden or value of additional or substitute safeguards.

(1) private interests at stake
- talk about why public employment or wages are important (people depend on their jobs for their livelihood, a salary cut would make it harder for people to support themselves or dependents, etc.)
- people have a right to voice concerns re: public matters

(2) government’s interest
- talk about cost and burdens of requiring more process
- government’s objective in depriving of LLP interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

TRO

A

A TRO is generally sought at the first stage of a plaintiff’s request for an injunction, and is primarily issued to maintain the status quo. Under the FRCP, TROs are not to exceed 14 days.

TROs are generally issued with a hearing and without notice so long as the movant’s attorney can certify that irreparable harm would result if the TRO were not immediately issued, and either good-faith efforts were made to notify the other party or notice to the other party would be harmful.

In issuing TROs, courts generally assess (1) whether irreparable harm will ensue, and (2) a balance of equities (though this is often not evaluated at the TRO stage).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Preliminary injunctions

A

Preliminary injunctions are issued before a trial on the merits in order to enjoin a law or activity while awaiting trial. Unlike TROs, PIs are not ex parte, and thus require notice and a hearing.

Elements:
(1) likelihood of success on the merits
(2) irreparable harm
(3) balance of equities (plaintiff’s hardships if injunction is not issued will be substantially greater than D’s if injunction is issued)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Declaratory judgment

A

A declaratory judgment is a special type of lawsuit in which the court rules on the rights and obligations of the parties involved in an actual case or controversy. Declaratory judgments are permissible and are distinct from advisory opinions. To obtain declaratory relief, the challenged action must involve an actual dispute and must pose an actual injury to plaintiff’s interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Eleventh Amendment

A

The Eleventh Amendment bars citizens from suing their own state in federal court without the state’s consent. Thus, such suits are generally prohibited.

However, a state official may be permissibly enjoined if the official’s acts violate federal law or the federal constitution. But, such suits are only valid as to injunctions, not damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Commerce Clause

A

The Commerce Clause grants Congress the authority to regulate (1) instruments of interstate commerce, (2) channels of interstate commerce, and (3) inter- and intra-state activities that, in aggregate, have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Spending Power

A

Under the spending clause, Congress has the power to spend for the general welfare. The spending clause allows Congress broad authority to accomplish regulation indirectly by conditioning federal funding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Executive Order

A

The president has the authority to issue executive orders within the scope of his presidential powers.

President’s powers include:
Appointment and Removal
Pardon power
Commander in Chief
Duty to Execute Laws
Foreign affairs
Deploy Troops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Supremacy Clause

A

When the federal government has authority to promulgate a law, that law is supreme over state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Preemption

A

Express Preemption - federal law explicitly states that it is the only law allowed

Implied Preemption - The state law conflicts with a federal law (conflict preemption) or the federal law is intended to occupy a field (field preemption)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause Art. IV (Comity)

A

The Comity Clause prohibits discrimination against out of state citizens with respect to fundamental rights or essential activities. (DOES NOT APPLY TO CORPORATIONS)

Laws that discriminate against out-of-state citizens are unconstitutional unless the state can show (1) a substantial justification for the differential treatment,

17
Q

Anti-Commandeering

A

The federal government cannot commandeer state legislatures and force them to pass or enforce federal laws

18
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

The Dormant Commerce Clause is a doctrine that limits state regulation of interstate commerce. (APPLIES TO CORPORATIONS AS WELL AS NATURAL PERSONS)

If Congress has not enacted legislation in a particular area of interstate commerce, then the states are free to regulate so long as (1) the regulation is not discriminatory against out-of-state commerce, (2) the regulation does not unduly burden INTERSTATE commerce, and (3) the regulation does not regulate wholly extraterritorial (out-of-state) activity.

(1) if a regulation discriminates against out-of-state commerce, it is still permissible if the regulation advances an important state interest and there are no non-discriminatory alternatives

(2) even if a regulation is nondiscriminatory, it may still be impermissible if the burden on INTERSTATE commerce substantially outweighs any state benefits.

(3) states may not deliberately regulate conduct that occurs wholly beyond their borders.

EXCEPTIONS:

(1) market-participant (when state acts as a buyer or seller rather than a market regulator)
(2) subsidy - states may grant in-state residents a subsidy
(3) traditional government function - states may favor state entities when those entities are performing a traditional government function
(4) congressional authorization of discriminatory legislation

19
Q

Takings Clause

A

Under eminent domain, the government may take private property for public purposes. As a check against this power, the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause require that the government provide just compensation when taking private property. This Clause has been incorporated against the states via the 14th amendment. A taking may occur as a result of a (1) physical invasion or (2) a regulation.

To have a taking, need a property interest!

When determining whether a regulation constitutes a taking, courts look at a variety of factors, including (1) the economic impact of the taking on the owner, (2) the extent to which regulation interferes with investment-backed expectations regarding use of property, (3) character of regulation, including public benefit and distribution of burdens and benefits on property owners (note - if the property still has some economically viable use, it can be considered a partial taking)

Regulations per se result in unconstitutional takings when they render the property without any economically viable use, or when they result in a permanent physical invasion (note - these constitute a total taking)

Just compensation- if a taking has occurred, the owner is entitled to the fair market value of the property at the time of the taking

Summary:
(1) Takings Clause intro (5th am, 14th am, types of taking)
(2) Government action
(3) private property
(4) public use
(5) property interest
(6) Physical Taking
(7) Regulator taking
- total vs partial

20
Q

Equal Protection

A

The equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment prohibits the government from discriminating against a class of persons. This protection extends against the federal government via the 5th amendment. Alleged equal protection violations are generally granted three levels of review:

Strict scrutiny is applied to laws that discriminate on the basis of suspect classifications or WITH RESPECT TO A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT. The test to survive strict scrutiny is if the law is narrowly tailored to advance a compelling government interest. Thus, the law must be the least restrictive means available.

Intermediate scrutiny - substantially related to an important government interest

Rational basis review - rationally related to a legitimate government interest

21
Q

Symbolic Speech

A

Laws that regulate symbolic speech are constitutional if (1) the restriction on speech is only incidental (purpose of law is unrelated to suppression of speech), (2) the law furthers an important government interest, (3) the burden on speech is no more than necessary, and (4) the law is within the government’s power to enact

22
Q

Prior Restraint

A

A prior restraint on speech is a restraint on speech that has not yet happened. Prior restraints are generally unconstitutional, but may in very limited circumstances be permissible IF: (1) there is a particular harm to be avoided, and (2) proper procedural safeguards are in place (i.e. immediate review of restraint and clear standards)

23
Q

Commercial speech

A

Commercial speech is only protected if not false or misleading

Protected speech can only be regulated if: (1) government interest is substantial, (2) the regulation directly advances the interest, and (3) the regulation is narrowly tailored

24
Q

Tests for each fora (Free Speech)

A

Content-Based - strict scrutiny (law must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest, and must be the least restrictive means)

Content-Neutral (TPM) - law must be narrowly tailored to advance a significant government interest, and must leave open ample alternative channels

25
Q

Establishment Clause

A

Challenges brought under the establishment clause are generally reviewed under the “historical practices and understanding” test, which allows for certain religious symbols, practices and accommodations when there is a long historical tradition of such allowance. But courts may forego this test an apply the more stringent strict scrutiny test when the law directly impacts a religion.

When applying historical practices and understanding test, courts often assess whether the ordinance or practice is rooted in history or tradition.

Always do strict scrutiny analysis but note that a court is unlikely to apply it if law does not impact religion

Then pull facts where law appears to favor or disfavor religion and make up some BS about how plaintiff may argue this violates Establishment Clause but a court would find that that is not the primary effect; the law does not actually favor or disfavor religion because there is no endorsement.

26
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

The First Amendment prohibits state action that interferes with the free exercise of religion, including both the freedom to believe and the freedom to act.

Sincerely held beliefs - the government may not determine the reasonableness of the belief, but it may determine the sincerity of the belief

27
Q

Substantive Due Process

A

Whether the government’s action impermissibly infringes on individual’s rights

Standard of Review:
Strict - when it infringes on a fundamental right (life, liberty, and property)

Non-fundamental rights get RBR

Generally should analyze together with PDP (so SDP would be whether it infringes, PDP is whether due process was provided)

28
Q

Fora (speech)

A

Traditional Public Forum
Content-based regulations are subject to strict scrutiny
Content-neutral regulations are subject to TPM test

Designated Public Forum
Content-based regulations are subject to strict scrutiny
Content-neutral regulations are subject to TPM test

Nonpublic forum
Government can regulate speech if:
(1) regulation is view-point neutral and
(2) reasonably related to a legitimate government interest

29
Q

Fundamental rights strand of EPC

A

When a law disallows SOME people from exercising a fundamental right EPC analysis is fine, when a law disallows ALL people from exercising a fundamental right, SDP analysis works better

30
Q

Classifications based on gender

A

Need an exceedingly persuasive justification

31
Q

Thirteenth Amendment

A

creates an exception where in involuntary servitude may only be permissible as a punishment for a crime

32
Q

SDP rights

A

Include fundamental rights to liberty and freedom of movement in one’s person

33
Q

Designated public forum

A

Government property that has not traditionally been used for speech related activities, but that the government has made available for such use

In a designated public forum, government may impose reasonable restrictions on speech so long as such restrictions are content-neutral time place and manner restrictions. Restrictions that are content-based are subject to strict scrutiny.