Constitutional Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Defamatory Speech

A

First Amendment requires plaintiff to prove all the elements of defamation plus falsity and actual malice, if the defamatory statement is about a public official/figure.

Actual Malice means
- Knowledge it was false, or
- Reckless disregard as to its truth/falsity

(Public Officials = electeds or public importance, e.g. prosecutor, cop, principal.)

(Public figure = role of prominence in society, fame/notoriety, or thrust themselves into controversy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Commercial Speech

A

Some is not protected if it is:

  1. False
  2. Misleading, or
  3. About illegal products/services.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Regulation of Commercial Speech

A

…will be upheld only if it:

  1. Serves a substantial government interest;
  2. Advances that interest; and
  3. Is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Content-Based Restriction

A

Strict Scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Advisory Opinions

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ripeness requires:

A
  1. Issue is fit for a judicial decision and
  2. Plaintiff would suffer substantial hardship in the absence of review
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mootness

A

remember it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Standing

A
  1. Injury in Fact (particularized and concrete)
  2. Causation
  3. Redressability

…no standing merely as citizens, except for tax bills and the Establishment Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Standing to Assert Rights of Others

A

yes if,

  1. Difficult for 3rd Party to assert their own right, or
  2. Close relationship between claimant and 3rd Party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standing of Organizations

A
  1. Injury to Members
  2. Members Injury is Related to the Organization’s Purpose
  3. Individual Member Participation in the Lawsuit is Not Required (not seeking individualized damages)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Standing to Enforce Government Statutes

A

Yes if they are within the “zone of interests” Congress meant to protect with that statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sovereign Immunity

A

Can’t sue the state or the federal government

  • States can sue other states
  • Unless state waives
  • CAN sue local governments
  • U.S. can sue states
  • States cannot sue U.S.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Political Question Doctrine

A

The court cannot decide the issue if it is a political question, which means the issue is:

  1. Constitutionally committed to another branch of government; or
  2. Inherently incapable of judicial resolution

E.g. President’s conduct of foreign policy, partisan legislative apportionment, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Adequate and Independent State Grounds

A

No jurisdiction if there is an independent and adequate state ground for the lower state court decision. Michigan case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Federal Police Power

A

None. Congress has no general police power except over federal land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Taxing and Spending Power

A

Congress has it; may use for any public purpose not prohibited by the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Spending Power Conditions

A

For Congress to impose conditions on the grant of money, the conditions must be:

  1. Clearly stated;
  2. Relate to the purpose of the program;
  3. Not be unduly coercive; and
  4. Do not violate the Constitution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Commerce Power

A

Congress may regulate interstate commerce, including,

  1. Channels of Commerce, e.g. rivers/waterways/telephone lines/Internet
  2. Instrumentalities of Commerce, e..g planes/trains/automobiles
  3. Activities that Have a Substantial Effect on Interstate Commerce, e.g. FDR grain quota program.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

War Powers

A

Congress has power to declare war, raise and support armies, and provide for and maintain a navy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Investigatory Power

A

Congress has

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Delegation of Legislative Power

A

Congress may delegate powers to administrative agencies as long as it does so with an intelligible principle behind it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Major Question Doctrine

A

SCOTUS-made doctrine in which administrative agencies cannot decide “major questions” without pointing out clear congressional authorization for it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Speech/Debate Clause

A

Immunity for Federal Legislators

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Bicameralism and Presentment

A

remember

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Impoundment

A

No power - cannot impound. Remember John Oliver clip.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Veto

A

Veto
Veto Override
Pocket Veto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Executive Agreements - Conflict with Other Laws

A
  1. Trumps State Law
  2. Subordinate to Federal Law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Executive Privilege

A

President has executive privilege to keep certain presidential communications secret.

Exception: In criminal proceedings, presidential communiques will be available to the prosecution where a need for such information is demonstrated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Executive Immunity

A

President has absolute immunity from civil damages based on any action taken while exercising official responsibilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Tenth Amendment

A

All powers not granted to the federal government or prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

State Police Power

A

Tenth Amendment = States have General Police Powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Anti-Commandeering Principle

A

Congress cannot commandeer the states by requiring them to enact state laws or to enforce federal laws.

Similarly, if Congress passes a tax that does not apply to private businesses but merely taxes state government entities, the Court may use 10A to prohibit that tax.

Does not apply when Congress regulates an activity in which both states and private actors engage. E.g. minimum wage laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Intergovernmental Immunity Doctrine

A

States cannot interfere with or control the operations of the federal government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Supremacy Clause

A

Express Preemption: Federal law may just say outright the state cannot adopt laws on this subject matter.

Implied Preemption:
- If a state/local law prevents achievement of a federal objective, it is impliedly preempted.
- Field Preemption: A valid federal law may impliedly “occupy” the entire field, thus barring any state or local law even if that law is nonconflicting.
- But note that there is a presumption against preemption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Interstate Compact Clause

A

If an agreement between states increases the states’ power at the expense of federal power, congressional approval is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Privileges and Immunities Clause

A
  1. Prohibits state discrimination against nonresidents. (not corporations/aliens) in commercial activities or fundamental rights.
  2. May be allowed if the law is necessary to achieve an important government purpose and there are no less restrictive means available.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

States may not unduly burden or discriminate against interstate commerce.

If Congress has not enacted laws on the subject, state/local government can regulate aspects of interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Discriminatory Regulations by a State Against Other States

A

State or local regulations that discriminate against interstate commerce to protect local economic interests are almost always invalid (for example, New York cannot ban California wines or tax them at a higher rate than local wines).

Unless needed for an important state interest. E.g. State could prohibit importation of live bait fish because parasites could harm their own fish population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Nondiscriminatory State Commerce Law

A

If a nondiscriminatory state law burdens interstate commerce, it will be valid unless the burden outweighs the promotion of a legitimate local interest. The court will consider whether less restrictive alternatives are available.

Example: An Iowa statute banning trucks over 60 feet was held to be invalid because the state showed no significant evidence of increased safety and the burden on commerce was substantial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

State as Market Participant

A

A state or local government may prefer its own citizens in receiving benefits from government programs or in dealing with government-owned businesses (for example, when hiring labor, buying or selling products, or giving subsidies).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Process for Interstate Commerce and State Questions

A

Federal Law Questions.

  1. Does the question refer to any federal legislation that might supersede the state regulation or preempt the field?
  2. …or that might authorize state regulation otherwise impermissible?

State Law Questions.

  1. If neither, does the state regulation discriminate against interstate or out-of-state commerce? If yes, invalid unless:
    - Furthers an important, noneconomic state interest and there are no reasonable alternatives; or
    - State is a market participant
  2. Does it place an undue burden on the free flow of interstate commerce? If yes, invalid if the burden on commerce outweighs the state interest.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Nondiscriminatory Tax

A

Valid if:

  1. Substantial Nexus between the taxing state and the activity (business availing itself of the state.)
  2. Fairly Apportioned according to a rational formula.
  3. Fair Relationship to the services/benefits provided by the state.
43
Q

“Doing Business” Taxes

A

Generally permitted. Must:

  1. Have a substantial nexus to the taxing state;
  2. Be fairly apportioned;
  3. Not discriminate against interstate commerce; and
  4. Fairly relate to services provided by the state.
44
Q

Full Faith and Credit Clause

A

State court judgments must be recognized in other states.

This rule applies only if the judgment was on the merits and was final.

45
Q

Exclusive Public Functions

A

Activities that are so traditionally the exclusive prerogative of the state are state action no matter who performs them.

So a company that runs a “company town” still can’t prohibit minorities from using the town park.

46
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

Substantially related to an important government purpose

47
Q

Rational Basis

A

Rationally related to a legitimate government purpose.

Easy to meet unless arbitrary or irrational.

48
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

Upheld only if it is the least restrictive means to achieve a compelling government purpose.

49
Q

Process Requires

A
  1. Notice
  2. Opportunity to be Heard
    - Type/extent of hearing determined by a balancing of:
    - Importance of interest to the individual and value of procedural safeguards to that interest against the government interest in efficiency.
  3. Neutral decisionmaker
50
Q

Fundamental Rights include:

A
  • All First Amendment rights
  • Right to interstate travel
  • Privacy
  • Voting
51
Q

Restrictions on Right to Vote

A
  • Reasonable time periods for residency are valid, e.g. 30 days
  • ID
52
Q

One Person One Vote

A
  1. State/Local Elections. Populations of voting districts must be substantially equal. 10% is a presumptively valid variance.
  2. Congressional Districts: Exact mathematical equality. 0.7% variance invalid.
53
Q

Gerrymandering

A

Political Gerrymandering = Nonjusticiable

Racial Gerrymandering = up in the air kind of

54
Q

Second Amendment

A

Must be consistent with the country’s historical tradition of firearm regulation

55
Q

Right to Refuse Medical Treatment

A

…exists

56
Q

Equal Protection

A

Suspect Classification → Strict Scrutiny (least restrictive means of achieving compelling govt purpose)

57
Q

Three Types of Potential EPC Violation

A
  1. Discriminatory on Face → Invalid
  2. Discriminatory Application → probably not invalid now; think Yick Wo
  3. Disparate Impact → not invalid now
58
Q

Affirmative Action

A

Only to remedy discrimination in that specific area/town or whatever.

Not past societal discrimination, and not for diversity.

59
Q

Eminent Domain

A
  1. Only for public use
  2. Must pay just compensation
60
Q

Taking v. Regulation

A

Taking:
- Confiscation of a person’s property
- Permanent or regular physical occupation of a person’s property by the government
- Sometimes temporary occupations, dependent on degree of invasion, duration, govt intention, foreseeability of the result, and more.

Regulation: If govt regulation denied landowner of all economically viable use of the land, that can be a taking.
- If it decreased economic value, maybe a taking, based on:
1. Govt interests;
2. Diminution in value to the owner;
3. Whether the regulation substantially interferes with the distinct, investment-backed expectations of the owner.

61
Q

Public Use in a Taking

A

Broadly construed. Rationally related to a legitimate public purpose, e.g. health/welfare/safety, you’re good.

62
Q

Just Compensation

A

Fair market value at the time of the taking

63
Q

Contract Clause

A

Limits state and local govts.’ ability to enact laws that retroactively impair contract rights.

Does not impede the federal government.

64
Q

Private Contracts

A

Intermediate Scrutiny

Legislation that substantially impairs an existing private contract is invalid unless the legislation:
1. Serves an important and legitimate public interest, and
2. Is a reasonable and narrowly tailored means of promoting that interest

65
Q

Public Contracts

A

Heightened Scrutiny

Legislation that impairs a contract to which the state is a party is tested by the same basic test, but the legislation will likely receive heightened scrutiny, especially if the legislation reduces the contractual burdens on the state.

66
Q

Ex Post Facto Laws

A

May not pass a law that retroactively alters criminal offenses or punishments in a substantially prejudicial manner to punish a person for past activity

67
Q

Bill of Attainder

A

Cannot target a person

68
Q

Speech includes…

A

Words, symbols, and expressive conduct.

69
Q

Expressive Conduct is:

A
  • Inherently expressive; or
  • Intended to convey a message and
  • Reasonably likely to be perceived as conveying a message
70
Q

Unprotected Speech

A
  1. Incitement
  2. Fighting Words
  3. True Threats
  4. Obscenity
  5. Defamatory Speech
71
Q

Incitement

A

Speech is incitement if it is:

  1. Intended to produce imminent lawless action and
  2. Likely to produce such action.
72
Q

Fighting Words

A

Personally abusive words that are likely to incite immediate physical retaliation in an average person.

73
Q

True Threats

A

Words that are intended to convey to someone a serious threat of bodily harm.

Speaker must have a subjective understanding of the threatening nature. A mental state of recklessness is sufficient.

74
Q

Obscenity

A

Speech is obscene if it describes or depicts sexual conduct specified by statute that:

  1. Appeals to the prurient interest, using a contemporary community standard;
  2. Is patently offensive under contemporary community standards; and
  3. Lacks serious value, using a national, reasonable person standard.
75
Q

Defamatory Speech

A

If about a public official/figure or involves a matter of public concern, plaintiff has to prove all the elements of defamation plus:

  1. Falsity
  2. A degree of fault, usually actual malice.
  • Actual Malice means
    • Knowledge it was false; or
    • Reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity
76
Q

Speech Restrictions on Government Property

A

Depend on whether the property is a:

  1. Public Forum
  2. Designated Public Forum
  3. Limited Public Forum
  4. Nonpublic ForumT
77
Q

Traditional Public Forum

A

Public property historically open to speech-related activities.

Streets, sidewalks, public parks.

78
Q

Designated Public Forums

A

Public property not historically open to speech-related activities, but which the government has thrown open for such activities.

Town hall open for use by civi group.

79
Q

Content-Based Speech Regulation must be:

A
  1. Narrowly tailored to
  2. Serve an important government interest, and
  3. Leave open alternative channels of communication.

Need not be the least restrictive means.

80
Q

Limited Public Forum

A

Government forums not historically open for speech/assembly, but opened for specific speech activity.

School gym open for a debate on a particular community issue; public university funding student publications.

81
Q

Nonpublic Forums

A

Government property not historically open for speech/assembly and not held open for specific speech activities.

Military bases or government workplaces.

82
Q

Regulation Level for Limited Public Forums and Nonpublic Forums

A

Govt. can regulate speech in this forum to reserve the forum for its intended use.

Regulation must be:
1. Viewpoint neutral; and
2. Reasonably related to a legitimate government purpose.

83
Q

Regulation of Speech in a Traditional or Designated Public Forum

A

Content Based → Strict Scrutiny

Content Neutral → Intermediate Scrutiny

84
Q

Speech Restrictions in Public Schools

A

School activities are not public forums

85
Q

Personal Student Speech on Campus

A

A student’s personal speech on campus cannot be censored absent evidence of substantial disruption.

86
Q

Personal Student Speech Off Campus

A

School is limited to preventing cheating, bullying, threats, and other speech where pedagogical or safety concerns predominate.

87
Q

School Speech

A

Restrictions on speech related to the school teaching must be reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical concern.

88
Q

Public Employee Speech

A

Unprotected if at work and relating to official duties, even if r.e. public concern.

Protected if a matter of public concern but not made pursuant to official duties, subject to a balancing test (govt interest in efficiency of workplace v. speech’s value).

89
Q

Void for Vagueness

A

Violates DPC

90
Q

Safeguards for Prior Restraint Regulations

A

To be valid, a system for prior restraint must:

  1. Be narrowly drawn, reasonable, and definite;
  2. The injunction must be promptly sought; and
  3. There must be prompt and final judicial determination of the validity of the restraint.
91
Q

Content-Based Restrictions on Freedom of the Press

A

Strict Scrutiny

92
Q

Compelled Speech

A

you know

93
Q

Government Funding of Speech is upheld if it is:

A

Rationally related to a legitimate state interest

94
Q

First Amendment and Election Law

A
  1. Limits on Contribution → Intermediate Scrutiny
  2. Limits on Expenditures → No Limits
95
Q

Free Exercise

A

Strict Scrutiny

96
Q

A Law is Discriminatory Against Religion if it is:

A

Either →

  1. Not neutral on its face; or
  2. Facially neutral but not generally applicable (by design targets religion generally or a religion in particular)
97
Q

Neutral Laws of General Applicability

A

Not challengeable under the Free Exercise Clause. Unless it was specifically designed to interfere with religion.

98
Q

Laws with System for Exemptions Not Generally Applicable

A

A law that gives government officials discretion to grant exemptions from the law is not generally applicable.

Thus, if someone seeks an exception from such a law on religious grounds and the government refuses to grant the exception, that person can challenge the denial on Free Exercise Clause grounds. Strict scrutiny would apply.

99
Q

Religious Exemptions Required?

A

No.

The Free Exercise Clause does not require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations that happen to burden religious conduct.

Exceptions:
- Ministers can “discriminate” in hiring
- State can’t refuse unemployment benefits to people who quit jobs for religious reasons.
- Right of Amish not to educate children

100
Q

Neutrality Principle

A

Govt neutral with respect to religion

101
Q

Establishment Clause - History and Tradition

A

The Court has often stated that the Establishment Clause must be
interpreted by reference to historical practices and understandings.

102
Q
A
103
Q
A