Constitutional Law Flashcards

1
Q

Rational Basis

A

A law will be upheld upon a showing that the law is rationally related to a legitimate government interest.

Applies to all other classifications not covered under Strict or Intermediate Scrutiny, like age.

Burden is on the PLAINTIFF to demonstrate that there is no rational relationship to any legit government interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strict Scrutiny

A

A law will be upheld only if it is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest.

Applies to protected classes, such as race and national origin.

Burden is on the GOVERNMENT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intermediate Scrutiny

A

A law will be upheld if it is substantially related to an important government interest.

Applies to quasi-protected classes, such as gender and illegitimacy.

Burden is on the GOVERNMENT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Equal Protection Clause

A

Used to ensure equal protection of the laws as applied to protected classes. Applies when a state enacts a law that discriminates against some people based on various classifications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

City of Boerne v. Flores (Congressional Powers)

A

Congress cannot, under its 14th Amendment power, legislate or prohibit constitutional behavior where there is no constitutional injury to be prevented or remedied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Private Parties Acting as State Actors

A

Occurs where (1) they have performed a traditional public function; (2) there is the enforcement of certain private contracts; (3) there is joint action or “entanglement” between a state and private actor; or (4) there is state encouragement of private discrimination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

United States v. Virginia (Separate Facilities for Each Gender)

A

Allow in certain cases, if state can (1) demonstrate the “exceedingly persuasive justification” for the separate treatment; and (2) demonstrating that the separate facilities are substantially equivalent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interstate Commerce Clause

A

Gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, as well as the instrumentalities of interstate commerce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

If the state regulation on its face discriminates against out of state business to promote in state businesses, then it will be held to be invalid unless it is necessary to achieve an important government purpose and no less restrictive means are available.

If the state regulation does not discriminate against out of state commerce on its face, then we look at the burden that it places on interstate commerce. If a state regulation unduly burdens interstate commerce, even though it is not discriminatory against out of state business, then it will be held to be invalid if its burden on interstate commerce outweigh the benefits to the state through the regulation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The 10th Amendment

A

Powers of the federal government not expressly herein granted are reserved to the states and the people, respectively.

Prohibits “commandeering,” meaning commanding local action, usurping local control, by taking over the state legislative or executive functions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Congress’s Spending Power

A

Congress has the power to place conditions upon grants of federal money to the states. Conditions on spending will be upheld so long as: (1) the terms of the condition are related to the funds being spent; (2) the terms of the condition are unambiguous and obvious to the states; (3) the spending being withheld if the states refuse to comply must be so great so as to be deemed coercive; and (4) the condition must not require the states to engage in unlawful or unconstitutional behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Brandenburg v. Ohio (First Amendment)

A

The First Amendment precludes the conviction of individuals who incite or advocate breaking the law unless (1) there is advocacy of illegal conduct and not just an abstract expression of ideas; (2) the advocacy calls for imminent lawbreaking; and (3) the lawbreaking is likely to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fighting Words

A

Excluded from protection of the First Amendment.

Words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace. They play little or no part in the exposition of ideas. Must be likely to cause a violent reaction from others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The First Amendment (generally)

A

Prohibits the government from restricting the content of speech unless: (1) the government can prove that (2) the restrict is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Defamation (First Amendment)

A

At common law, a plaintiff may bring a defamation action against a defendant who makes a false statement about the plaintiff.

However, public figures cannot recover for defamation unless they can show that the defaming statement was made with actual malice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Actual Malice

A

Found where the statement is made with knowledge that it is false or with reckless disregard of its truth or falsity.

17
Q

The 11th Amendment

A

Prohibits a state from being sued in federal court by its citizens, unless it consents. However, Section 5 of the 14th Amendment abrogate a state’s 11th Amendment power and allow for suits against it to take place in federal court.

NOTE: Only prevents State suit in Federal court; not State suit in State court.

18
Q

Article III, Section 2 (Original Jurisdiction over…)

A

The US Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls, and in which a state is a party.

19
Q

Obscenity

A

Category of speech not protected by the First Amendment. Obscenity is a depiction of sexual conduct that, taken as a whole, by the average person, using contemporary community standards: (1) appeals to the prurient interest in sex; (2) portrays sex in a patently offensive way; and (3) using a national, reasonable person standard, does not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

20
Q

When does a “taking” occur?

A

When the government (1) permanently physically occupies an owner’s private land; or (2) totally deprives the land of any economic value.

21
Q

Doctrine of Eminent Domain

A

A government entity may take private land for any public use, broadly construed, including economic development. As long as the taking is rationally related to a public good, the court will uphold the taking. Government must pay just compensation tho.

22
Q

School Searches

A

Will be upheld only if it offers a moderate chance of finding evidence of wrongdoing, the measures adopted to carry out the search are reasonably related to the objectives of the search, and the search is not “excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of the student and the nature of the infraction.”

23
Q

When are taxes under the Commerce Clause valid?

A

Valid if:

(1) The tax does not discriminate against interstate commerce;
(2) There is substantial nexus between the activity taxed and the taxing state;
(3) The tax is fairly apportioned; and
(4) The tax fairly relates to services or benefits provided by the state.

24
Q

Enabling Clause of the 13th Amendment

A

13th Amendment prohibits slavery. The Enabling Clause of the 13th Amendment has been held to confer on Congress the authority to proscribe almost any private racially discriminatory action that can be characterized as a badge or incident of slavery.

25
Q

Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution

A

Prohibits state courts from re-litigating cases in which the courts of another state have rendered final judgment.