Constitutional Framework for Protection of Individual Liberties Flashcards

1
Q

What is the exception to the rule that the Constitution applies to public/state action?

A

13th Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When can the actions of private individuals be considered state action?

A

Where the private individual/entity is performing an exclusive public function or where there is significant state involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is a private individual performing an exclusive public function?

A

When they perform a function traditionally the exclusive prerogative of the state (running a town, conducting an election, running a prison)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is there significant state involvement in private conduct such as to make it state action?

A

Where a state affirmatively facilitates, encourages, authorizes, or is entwined with the challenged private conduct
Examples: enforcing racially restrictive covenants (Shelley); leasing property to a racially discriminatory lessee where the state derive extra benefits from the discrimination (Burton); administering a private discriminatory trust; an association of public and private schools dominated by public schools and run by public school officials during school hours (Brentwood)
Not significant state involvement: NCAA (association of public and private universities); state grant of liquor license to discriminatory private club (moose lodge); granting corporate charter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which rights in the bill of rights have not been incorporated against the states and their political subdivisions?

A

3A right not have soldiers quartered in the hold
5A right to grand jury indictment
7A right to jury in civil cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three constitutional prohibitions on retroactive legislation?

A
  1. Contract clause
  2. ex post facto clauses
  3. Prohibition on bills of attainder
    - –also any retroactive law that passes muster under these categories should still have to contend with due process requirements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the contract clause do?

A

Limits the ability of states to enact laws that retroactively impair contract rights (not applicable to federal government or to contracts not yet made). Different rules for private and public contracts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does a state law impairing a private contract violate the contracts clause?

A

State legislation that substantially impairs an existing private contract is invalid unless (1) it serves an important and legitimate public interest and (2) is reasonable and narrowly tailored to achieve that interest (e.g., moratorium on mortgage foreclosures in economic crisis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When does a state law impairing a public contract violate the contracts clause?

A

A similar test but receive heightened scrutiny, with special attention to whether the legislation reduced the state’s contractual burden.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What do the ex post facto clauses prohibit?

A

States and federal government may not retroactively alter criminal offenses or punishments. There are three categories:
(1) makes an act criminal that was innocent when done
(2) prescribes a greater punishment for an act than what was prescribed when done
(3) reduces the evidence required to prove guilt from what was required when the act was done
Relatedly 5A and 14A due process prevent courts from retroactively applying interpretations of criminal laws in unexpected and indefensible ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are bills of attainder?

A

Legislative acts inflicting punishments on individuals without a judicial trial. Not permissible by feds or states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the basic requirement of procedural due process?

A

An individual has a right to a fair process when the government intentionally* acts to deprive them of life, liberty, or property.
*not negligently!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When is the state depriving someone of a liberty interest?

A

Occurs if someone is denied physical freedom (institutionalization, imprisonment), or is denied a Constitutional or statutory right (right to contract, right to gainful employment, parental rights, etc).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is the state depriving someone of a property interest?

A

Personal belongings and realty as well as government entitlements to which the individual has a legitimate claim/reasonable expectation of continued receipt (welfare benefits, public education, government licenses, tenured or term public employment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do courts determine what process is required in a given situation?

A

Notice (reasonably calculated to inform) and opportunity to be heard prior to the deprivation are usually required (preference for pre-deprivation proceedings unless impracticable). Fair procedures and a neutral decision maker (no actual or serious risk of bias) are always required.

Three-part Mathews balancing test determines the nature and extent of proceedings:

(1) The importance of the interest to the individual
(2) the value of specific procedural safeguards and risk of erroneous deprivation as a result of certain procedures
(3) the burden on the government (government’s interest in fiscal and administrative efficiency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can due process rights be waived?

A

Yes, if voluntary and knowing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What process is required for commitment to a mental institution?

A

Adult: prior notice and prior evidentiary hearing absent emergency
Child: prior screening by neutral fact-finder. parental consent alone insufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What process is required for termination of welfare benefits?

A

Prior notice and prior evidentiary hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What process is required for termination of disability benefits?

A

Prior notice and opportunity to respond accompanied by subsequent evidentiary hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What process is required for termination of non at-will public employment?

A

Prior notice, opportunity to respond, subsequent evidentiary hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What process is required for suspension of driver’s license?

A

prior evidentiary hearing (except for breathalyzer test suspension statutes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What process is required for disciplinary suspension/dismissal from public education?

A

Prior notice and opportunity to respond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What process is required for termination of parental rights?

A

Notice, hearing, prior evidentiary hearing showing proof of neglect or misconduct by clear and convincing evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What process is required for civil forfeitures?

A

Real property: prior notice and evidentiary hearing

Personal property: subsequent notice and hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What process is required for detention of a citizen as an enemy combatant?
subsequent notice and meaningful opportunity to constellation the factual basis for detention before a neutral decisionmaker
26
What does the 5A takings clause prohibit?
The taking of private property for public use without just compensation (incorporated against states via 14A). This can include both physical appropriations and action that damages or impairs a property's use
27
What property does the takings clause apply to?
Real and personal property; some intangible property like interest on an attorney trust account or trade secrets. Other intangible property may not be protected under takings but would still require procedural due process (welfare benefits)
28
What constitutes a taking?
Physical: – confiscation/appropriatoin -- occupation/physical invasion Regulatory/use restriction
29
When is a temporary occupation a taking?
May be a taking depending on degree of invasion, duration, government intent, foreseeability with respect to result, character of property and level of interference with use. Exception: in a public/wartime emergency, even a complete and permanent deprivation is not going to be a taking
30
When are traditional conditions on property development a taking?
E.g., streets, utility easements | Not a taking if benefits roughly proportional to burdens
31
What are the two tests applied to determining whether a regulatory taking has occurred?
(1) Bright line: there is a taking if the regulation denies the landowner all economic use of their land (prohibition on putting any building on it). If the denial is temporary, the court will look at factors like length of delay, actual effect, good faith, etc... (2) Balancing test: usually diminished property value is not a taking but courts will consider (1) the economic impact of the regulation/diminution in value; (2) the character of the government action (in relation to what counts as a traditionally government regulation); (3) where there is a substantial interference with an investment-backed expectation of the owner
32
What constitutes a public use?
This is liberally construed. Anything rationally related to a legitimate public purpose. Can extend to takings by private enterprises redounding to the public advantage (railroads, public utilities)
33
What is an exaction?
Municipal conditions on building/development permits (landowner must convey all or part of title to govt/grant a public easement).
34
When are exactions a taking?
They are a taking unless (1) government can show an essential nexus between the condition and proposed development (legitimate government interest) and (2) adverse impact is roughly proportional to loss caused to property owner
35
What is the remedy for a taking without condemnation proceedings?
An action for inverse condemnation -- if successful government will have to pay just compensation or terminate the regulation and pay damages
36
What is just compensation?
Fair market value at the time of the taking (no compensation need be paid to the owner of worthless property)
37
What are the three general levels of scrutiny?
Rational basis Intemediate scrutiny Strict scrutiny
38
What is the rational basis formula?
State action must be rationally or reasonably related to a rational or legitimate interest. The burden of proof is on the challenger and the state action is presumed valid. A/k/a law valid unless arbitrary and irrational
39
What is the intermediate scrutiny formula?
The state action must be substantially related to an important or significant state interest. Substantially related requires narrow tailoring but not the least restrictive means. The burden of proof is on the state.
40
What is the strict scrutiny formula?
The state action must be the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling state interest. The burden of proof is on the state and the state action is presumed invalid. A/K/A "necessary to achieve a compelling govt purpose" or "narrowly tailored to achieve an overriding government purpose"
41
What does strict scrutiny apply to?
Regulations affecting fundamental rights or evolving a suspect classification
42
What does intermediate scrutiny apply to?
Regulations involving quasi-suspect classifications
43
How do you determine whether a suspect or quasi-suspect classification discrimination is involved?
(1) facially discriminatory | (2) not facially discriminatory but has disparate impact and discriminatory intent
44
Which classifications are suspect?
Race, national origin, alienage
45
Which classifications are quasi-suspect?
Gender, non-marital child status
46
What have courts generally ruled with respect to the government's ability to diversify or desegregate schools?
Government has a compelling interest in remedying effects of past segregation. Bussing was found to be narrowly tailored to respond to this but bussing for a broader diversity purpose was not narrowly tailored (dodged whether diversity was a compelling interest)
47
What have courts generally ruled with respect to the government's ability to diversify higher education?
There is a compelling government interest in diversity in higher education which is permissibly accomplished by means of using race as a soft factor in a multi-factor admissions system. Race quotas/hard factors not permissible
48
When may a state or local government require US citizenship as a condition of public participation?
Generally cannot for benefits, property ownership, bar admission, or public employment but can where the activity is integral to self-governance (voting, holding elective public office, being a police officer, being a public school teacher -- not for being a notary public)
49
What test is applied to determine whether a gender discriminatory law is Constitutional?
Intermediate scrutiny and the important interest involve must have an exceedingly persuasive justification beyond role stereotype
50
When is a classification subject to rational basis never rational?
When based on animus
51
What is the basic substantive due process analysis?
(1) is it a fundamental right? (2) if yes -- strict scrutiny (3) if no -- rational basis review
52
What rights are fundamental?
Enumerated rights in the Constitution (freedom of speech, e.g.) and unenumerated rights which are rooted in history and tradition, implicit in the concept of ordered liberty, or identified as fundamental based on reasoned judgment and new insight They are: privacy (marriage, procreation, contraception, child custody care and upbringing, living with extended family, abortion); voting, and interstate travel
53
What analysis is applied to abortion restrictions?
The right to privacy includes a right to an abortion without interference from the state. The states two possible compelling interests are (1) the health of the mother; and (2) protecting the life of the fetus. The court has thus split the analysis into pre- and post-viability rules. Pre-viability: a state may adopt a regulation protecting the mother's health and life of the fetus only if the regulation does not place an undue burden or a substantial obstacle to the right to obtain an abortion Post-viability: a state's interest in the life of the fetus may override the mother's right, but cannot prohibit a mother from obtaining an abortion for health and safety reasons
54
Does the government have an obligation to finance abortions?
No
55
What constitutes an undue burden on the pre-viability right to an abortion?
Spousal notification requirements | Requirement that abortion providers have admitting privileges at local hospitals
56
What has been found not to constitute an undue burden on the pre-viability right to an abortion?
Requiring the doctor give information relevant to informed consent 24 hour waiting periods parental consent or notice for minors so long as there is a judicial bypass option requirement that the abortion be performed by a licensed physician Barring well-defined partial birth abortion procedures
57
Is there a fundamental right to intimate sexual conduct?
While the court has not specified a standard of review for laws regarding this, it has made clear that there is no legitimate state interest in criminalizing non-commercial consensual adult sexual intimacy and such laws could not even survive rational basis review
58
Is there a right against the accumulation and distribution of information about citizens by the government?
no
59
What restrictions on the right to vote are not subject to strict scrutiny?
Age, residency (if time periods are reasonable), citizenship
60
May governments require voters to show government ID to vote?
yes
61
Can states condition voting on property ownership?
No, except for some special purpose elections
62
Can the government institute a poll tax?
no, unconstitutional
63
Can states require early registration for primaries?
yes
64
What is the one person one vote principle?
The right to vote cannot be diluted at any level of government when that government decides to select representatives to a governing body by district`
65
What is the requirement for national congressional districts?
States must use almost exact mathematical equality in creating congressional districts w/in the state Congress gets deference when apportioning representatives among the states in good faith and is not subject to precise math formula
66
What is the requirement for districting at state/local level?
the districts in state and local elections must not include variances in populations that are unjustifiably large but need not be within a few percentage points of one another. Deviations from mathematical equality must be reasonable and tailored to promote a legitimate state interest (like preserving political subdivisions)
67
How must states count the population for purpose of districting?
need not count only eligible voters/fine to count total population
68
Where is the one person one vote requirement inapplicable?
Appointed officials and officials elected at large Elections of officials dealing with matters of special interest in the community rather than exercising normal govt authority (eg water storage districts)
69
What are the constitutional restrictions on candidate qualification requirements?
Cannot charge a fee precluding indigents from running for office ballot access regs must be reasonable nondiscriminatory means of promoting impt state interests (like a show of reasonable support to get on ballot)
70
What is included in the right to interstate travel?
fundamental right to migrate from state to state and be treated equally after moving to a new state. problem when state imposes minimum durational residency requirements for receiving benefits etc... Invalid -- 1 yr residencies to receive full welfare benefits, state subsidized medical care or to vote Valid - 30 day residency to vote, 1 yr residency to get divorced Does not include right to international travel but this is protected from federal interference under 5A due process subject to rational basis review