CONSTI Comelec natira Flashcards
A manifest error meaning
is one that is visible to the eye or obvious to the understanding; that which is open, palpable, incontrovertible, needing no evidence to make it more clear
The popular vote does not cure the inelegibility of a candidate. Why?
It emphasized that the ballot cannot override the constitutional and statutory requirements for qualifications and disqualifications of candidates.
A failure of election may be declared only in the three instances:
- The election has not been held
- the election has been suspended before the hour fixed by law
- and the preparation and the transmission of the election returns have given rise to the consequent failure to elect, meaning nobody emerged as the winner
Force majeur, violence, terrorism, fraud or other analogous causes.
before the COMELEC can grant a verified petition seeking to declare a failure of election, the concurrence of 2 conditions must be established:
- no voting has taken place in the precints concearned on the date fixed by law or, even if there was voting, the election nevertheless resulted in a failure to elect
- the votes cast would affect the result of the election
The only time that a second placer is allowed to take the place of a disqualified winning candidate is when two requisites concur, namely:
- The candidate who obtained the highest number of votes is disqualified;
- The electorate was fully aware in fact and in law of that candidate’s disqualification as to bring such awareness within the realm of notoriety but the electorate still cast the plurality of the votes in favor of the inelegible candidate
The phrase “within the realm of notoriety” refers to something that is widely known or famous, but often for negative reasons. When something falls “within the realm of notoriety,” it is recognized by many people, usually due to a scandal, controversy, or some infamous action.
Labo case, the disqualification of the candidate had not become final before the elections.
Section 4. The Commission may, during the election period, supervise or regulate the enjoyment or utilization of all franchises or permits for the operation of transportation and other public utilities, media of communication or information, all grants, special privileges, or concessions granted by the Government or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including any government-owned or controlled corporation or its subsidiary. Such supervision or regulation shall aim to ensure equal opportunity, time, and space ,and the right to reply, including reasonable, equal rates therefor, for public information campaigns and forums among candidates in connection with the objective of holding free, orderly, honest, peaceful, and credible elections. What is the reason for such grants?
Such supervision or regulation shall aim to ensure equal opportunity, time and space, and the right to reply, including reasonable, equal rates therefor, for public information campaigns and forums among candidates in connection with the objective of holding free, orderly, honest peaceful, and credible elections
The reason is that such grants, especially those dealing with transportation and communication, can be used to improper advantage by political parties or candidates to the detriment of their rivals who may not be enjoying the privileges. Thus, radio or television time can be alloted unfairly or transportation facilities monopolized by certain candidates only unless the commission on Elections interposes its supervisory or regulatory powers.
Newspaper Case
pp 791 Book
The SC declared as unconstitutional. It held that the compulsory donation was a taking of private property without payment of the just compensation required in expropriation cases. Moreover, the respondent had not established the necessity of the taking, considering that the newspapers were not unwilling to sell advertising space, let alone its own authority to expropriate.
Radio and television case. a law requiring radio and television stations to give free air time to the COMELEC to enable it to broadcast information regarding candidates constitute a valid regulation by the state on the use of its air waves.
pp 791 book
SC considered said law to be a valid exercise of the police power.
It nevertheless ruled that it cannot exercise its powers without limitations, or reasonable basis. It does have discretion, but such discretion is something that must be exercised within the bounds and intent of the law.
How about the change done by the COMELEC in computing the airtime allowed candidates and political parties referred to as its rule on aggregate-based airtime limits
SC held, for being unreasonable and arbitrary as it unduly restricts and constrains the ability of candidates and political parties to reach out and communicate with the people
How about the disclosure of the names of the those who commission or pay the election surveys?
SC, requirement is a valid regulation in the exercise of police power and effects the constitutional policy of guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service.
how about the posting of election material on vehicles used for public transport or transport terminals, both of which are owned by private persons.
The court pronounced that the COMELECS constitutionally delegated powers of supervision and regulation do not extend to the ownership per se of PUVS and transport terminals, but only to the franchise or permit to operate the same.
SC therefore invalidated said prohibition, stressing that the posting of election campaign material on vehicles used for public transport or on transport terminals is not only a form political expression, but also an act of ownership. It has nothing to do with the franchise or permit to operate the PUV or transport terminal. The ownership of transport terminals, even if made available for use by the public commuters, likewise remains private
Section 2, subsection 1 the objective of enforce and administer all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of an election, plebiscite, initiativ, referendum and recall
To achieve the objective of holding free, orderly, honest, peaceful and credible elections.
Instances when a substitution may be made namely:
- When the nominee dies
- when the nominee withdraws his nomination in writing
- When he becomes permanently incapacitated to continue as such
To give more teeth to its authority to enforce and administer election laws, the present Constitution reiterates the requirement that no pardon, amnesty, parole or suspension of sentence for the violation of election laws, rules and regulations shall be granted by the president without the favorable recommendatin of the Comission this rule, significantly, now covers even violations of administrative rules and regulations concerning elections.
Without this provision, persons covicted of election offenses committed by them for the benefit ot the party might be undersevedly relieved of their penalties by a grateful administration
The exclusive power of the Commission on Elections to investigate and prosecute cases of violations of election laws derive from?
Omnibus Election Code.
Under Section 265 of the Omnibus Election Code, the COMELEC, through its duly authorized legal officers, has the exclusive power to conduct a preliminary investigation of all election offenses punishable under the Omnibus Election Code, and to prosecute the same, it may however avail itself of the assistance of other prosecuting arms of the government. Example:
It is clear that the Chief State Prosecutor, all Provincial and City Fiscals, and/or their respective assistants have been given continuing authority, as deputies of the commission, to conduct preliminary investigation of complaints involving election offenses under the election laws and to prosecute the same. Such authority may be revoked or withdrawn anytime by the COMELEC, either expressly or impliedly, when it its judgment such revocation or withdrawal is necessary to protect the integrity of the process to promote the common good, or where it believes that successful prosecution of the case can be done by COMELEC