Conspiracy Flashcards

1
Q

Conspiracy: section and penalty

A

s310(1) CA 1961

7 years imprisonment if maximum punishment for that exceeds 7 years, otherwise same punishment as if he had committed that offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conspiracy: Elements

A

Conspires
With any other person
to commit any offence
OR
to do or omit, in any part of the world
anything of which the doing or omission in New Zealand would be an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conspiracy: definition

A

Two or more people
forming an agreement
to do an unlawful act
or do a lawful act by unlawful means

Where there is only the intention to commit the offence without an agreement, then no offence committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mulcahy v R

A

A conspiracy consists not merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act, or do a lawful act by unlawful means. So long as such a design rests in intention only it is not indictable. When the two agree to carry it (the intended offence) into effect, the very plot is an act itself…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conspiracy: Omission

A

The agreement between the parties concerned may also have an omission (failure to act) as opposed to a commission of an offence.
exclusion or leaving something out.
Failure to fulfil a moral or legal obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conspiracy: withdrawing from the act

A

A person withdrawing from the agreement is still guilty of conspiracy, as are those people who become party to the agreement after it has been made. However a person can effectively withdraw before the actual agreement is made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Completion of conspiracy

A

The offence is complete on the agreement being made with the required intent. No further progression towards the completion of the offence nor further involvement by the parties involved in the agreement is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When a conspiracy ends

A

R v Sanders: A Conspiracy does not end with the making of the agreement. the conspiratorial agreement continues in operation and therefore in existence until it is ended by completion of its performance or abandonment or in any other manner by which agreements are discharged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mens rea for conspiracy

A

-an intention of those involved to agree, and
- an intention that the relevant course of conduct should be pursued by those party to the agreement

note; must be intent to commit the full offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Actus reus of conspiracy

A

The agreement between two or more people to put their common design into effect.

the agreement must be made before the commission of the acts which make up the full offence and the object of the conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conspiracy: passive presence or knowledge of intention

A

Mere passive presence or knowledge of an intention does not amount to being a party to the conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

intent:

A

Deliberate act to produce a specific result.

Act or omission done deliberately. Act or omission must be more than involuntary or accidental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Conspiracy: two or more people
Case law white
Parties unknown

A

R v White: Where you can prove that the suspect conspired with other parties (one or more people) whose identities are unknown, the suspect can still be convicted even if the identity of the other parties is never established and remains unknown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

s67 CA 1961

A

Conspiring with spouse or partner

A person is capable of conspiring with his or her spouse or civil union partner or with his or her spouse or civil union partner and any other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conspiracy: jurisduction

A

A person charged with conspiracy need not have been in New Zealand at the time of the act, omission, event.

In R v Sanders it was deemed sufficient if one act or omission forming part of the offence (or any event necessary to the completion to the offence) occurs in New Zealand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conspiracy entered into overseas

A

New Zealand courts have no jurisdiction over a conspirator who enters the conspiracy abroad and never comes to New Zealand.

17
Q

Conspiracy to commit an offence overseas

A

it is an offence to conspire to commit an offence to do or omit anything in any part of the world that would be an offence in New Zealand.

Defence: able to prove the act is not an offence under the law of the place where it was to be committed

18
Q

Conspiracy: specific offences

A

Specific provisions exist for:
-treason
-piracy
-making false accusations
-defeating jsutice
-murder