Consideration Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

An expression of willingness of a contract on certain terms and wholehearted acceptance of an offer that the offeree knows is being made

A

Allied Marine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Currie v Misa Consideration definition

A

Either a benefit to a person receiving, or detriment to other, or both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 P’s from Pollock (Consideration)

A

The price you pay for another’s promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consideration need not be adequate, but must be sufficient

A

Chappell v Nestle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consideration must have some economic value

A

Thomas v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Forebearance (promise not do something) is not good consideration, due to public policy issues (floodgate rule)

A

White v Bluett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Possible exception to Forebearance rule if it involves giving up one’s legal rights

A

Hamer v Sidwar

US Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Past consideration is not good consideration (general rule)

A

Roscorla v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Possible exception to ‘past consideration is good consideration’ rule if:
The act was carried out at the promisor’s request

A

Lampleigh v Brathwait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Possible exception to ‘past consideration is good consideration’ rule if:
The parties understood from the beginning that the act was to be rewarded in some way

A

Re Casey’s Patents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Performance of existing contractual obligation is not good consideration for a promise to pay more

A

Stilk v Myrick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Possible exception to Stilk v Myrick:

If A exceeds duties or confers extra benefit to B

A

Hartley v Ponsonby

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Williams v Roffey

Criteria for possible exception to Stilk v Myrick

A
  • contract for goods/services in return for payment;
  • B doubts whether A will complete his obligations;
  • B promises additional payment if A completes obligations on time;
  • As a result, B obtains a practical benefit or obviates a disbenefit
  • Promise not given as a result of economic duress or fraud
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A promise to do something can amount to consideration even if the promisor is already bound to perform obligation by another party

A

Scotson v Pegg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Part payment of undisputed debts is NOT good consideration for a promise by creditor to forgo balance

A

Foakes v Beer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exception to Foakes v Beer:

Pinnel’s Case

A

Part payment is good consideration if debtor gives something different or pays early

17
Q

Exception to Foakes v Beer:

Promissory Estoppel

A
Promise
Reliance
Inequitable
Defence
Effect
18
Q

Promissory estoppel

Promise - Must be a promise to waive a legal right, which must be intended to be acted upon by other party

A

Hughes v Metropolitan Rail

19
Q

Promissory estoppel

Reliance - promisee must act upon promise, altering their position

A

Alan v El Nasr

20
Q

Promissory estoppel

Inequitable - Must be inequitable for promisor to go back on promise

A

D&C Builders v Rees

21
Q

Promissory estoppel

Defence - Shield not a sword, so will not give rise to cause of action

A

Combe v Combe

22
Q

Promissory estoppel
Effect - Effect of PE is to extinguish or suspend legal rights.
Can recommence on reasonable notice

A

High Trees

23
Q

Promissory estoppel
In cases were promisee cannot resume original position, promissory estoppel may operate to permanently extinguish the promisor’s legal rights

A

Ajayi v RT Briscoe

24
Q

Performance of one’s public/legal duties is NOT good consideration

A

Collins v Godefroy

25
Q

Exception to Collins v Godefroy:

If not contrary to public policy

A

Williams v Williams

26
Q

Exception to Collins v Godefroy:

If public duty is exceeded

A

Glassbrook Bros v Glamorgan