Consideration Flashcards

1
Q

Needed for contract

A

Offer
Acceptance
ITCLR
consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Defined in

A

Currie V misa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Defined as

A

Right interest or benefit accruing To 1 party with loss detriment or responsibility to the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

6 rule

A

Must be sufficient need not be adequate

Past consideration is not consideration

Instalments are consideration

Performance of existing duty is not

Extra or new duty is

Must move from promisee to promsior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sufficient not adequate case

A

Thomas V Thomas - not be adequate as court will not interfere with bad bargain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is sufficient

A

Chappell V nestle - sufficient as had economic value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Past consideration

A

No consideration under

Mac ardle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exception to past consideration

A

Lampliegh V braithwaite

When payment can be implied into request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consideration must move from promisee to promisor

A

Tweddle V airkenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Instalments

A

A promise to accept part payment instead of entire existing dept is not consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Instalment case

A

Pinnel

Can claim remainder of dept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Part payment of debt and intesst

A

Foakes V beer
Interest can be added

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Performance of existing duty

A

Not consideration

Merely doing one’s job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Performance of existing duty case

A

Stilk V myrick - merely doing one’s job

Collins V Godfrey- public duty as police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

New or extra duty

A

Consideration is given

Hartley V poisenby - as role was made more dangerous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is a benefit existing or extra duty

A

Extra

Consideration is given

Williams V roffery - as given benefit

17
Q

Move from promisee to promisor

A

Tweddle V atikinson

18
Q

What is sufficient

A

Chappell V nestle

Tangible
Economic value - chocolate wrapper